MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Empty Suit Beaten By Empty Chair, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #290 |@MDWorld

September 3, 2012 Mike Gold 0 Comments

Now that the Republicans have had their party, I sure hope they’re dancing in the streets enjoying whatever post-convention bump they got. Unless something amazing happens – remember Gerry Ford telling Jimmy Carter “There is no Soviet dominance of Eastern Europe” back in 1976? – there are no more votes to turn.

All the Democrats have to do is hold their line on women’s issues, particularly college women who are real thrilled about their Paul Ryan Medicare denial of service alert. The black vote will organize against Jim Crow, which may very well be the most significant event to hit the black political community since Strom Thurmond led the Dixiecrats out of the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party has to get all old-timey about making sure their everybody who needs to has their photo IDs; as of this writing, the courts in Florida and Texas are nullifying those disenfranchising laws.

Romney’s commercials showing us how it is the sweat and blood of the Trust Babies who really built this country without help from the government are not going to inspire even those few white male workers who still have their pensions and health insurance. They’ll continue to vote for Mitt against the HNIC, but their wives will not. Their wives pay the bills. They see the medical bills. They see their aging parents’ medical bills and they know what life would be like without Medicare. And they do not like the GOP’s hands up their girl-parts, whatever their personal views on abortion. White guys are dumb; we vote our football fantasies. Women have spent their entire lives looking at white guys act out their football fantasies and they will vote.

Condi Rice did a nice job at the convention, delivering the only speech worth listening to. But she is not going to make up that 10 point spread on the women’s vote. Condi is not going to make up that 100 point spread on the black vote. The black vote has a lot on the line: they’re fighting Jim Crow, they’re holding on to their turf, they’re dealing for their kids’ future. Both groups, as well as Latinos, seniors and homosexuals, know these Trust Babies are their enemy and they will not tolerate removal of suffrage rights. In a fair count – always an issue when it comes to the modern Republicans – it’s hard to win when you’re behind with all of those groups of Americans.

It’s hard to see how Clint Eastwood’s wacky chair stunt helps the cause. When it comes to turning votes, Clint appeals to… whom? Clint’s airtime was at the expense of Mario Rubio (so much for pimping the Latino vote) and of the candidate. And… for what? So we can see Dirty Harry do battle with an empty chair? Aside from the fact that Astaire did it better, in the real debates Empty Suit Mitt will be taking on a chair with a Harvard Law School grad sitting in it.

The day after the convention ended, who did you see on teevee the most – Mario Rubio, Mitt Romney, or Clint Eastwood? Clint’s weird half-time show won’t get them a single new vote and, at best, he replaces the yawns generated by Jon Voight’s paranoid babble of lies. Now the Republicans have a harder time running against the Hollywood liberals. They’ve got their own Hollywood stars. Big names like Clint Eastwood. And Jon Voight. And Jon Lovitz, Cheryl Ladd, Tom Selleck, Bill Engvall, Stephen Baldwin, Heather Locklear, James Caan, Victoria Jackson and Jeff Foxworthy.

Wow.

Unless Obama screws up, bankers start leaping off of buildings or the current SEAL Swiftboating clicks, we just saw Mitt’s best days in the campaign. The equally-useless Democratic Convention will happen, Barack Obama will get his bump, and the debates will happen. Mitt won’t push for more than the minimum number of debates because he can’t be held accountable for being the architect of Obamacare and he doesn’t want to talk about his taxes or his massive exporting of American jobs or his party’s taking a massive diarrheic dump on women, or for his lack of commitment to anything other than getting elected. Nobody cares about the Republican Platform or the Democratic Platform; nobody’s mind is going to change, and once again the swing vote won’t show up.

If the black vote and the old people go out and get their IDs, if women come out to vote – particularly college-age women who well understand exactly what they have on the line – Obama will win by the usual two points in the popular vote and at least a fart in the electoral college.

Mitt simply doesn’t have the noses… if he can’t steal it, he won’t win it.

A tip of the Gold-dome to John Ostrander for access to the graphic.

Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com , every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week (check the website above for times) and available On Demand at the same place. He also joins Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Martha Thomases
    September 3, 2012 - 12:10 pm

    I only hope the Dems vet everything through fact-checkers. I don’t want to hear that inane “But both sides do it” meme again.

  2. Mike Gold
    September 3, 2012 - 2:32 pm

    What, lie their asses off? The big difference between the Democrats and the Republicans — and not just the current elephant usurpers — is that the Democrats tend to understand how video tape works. Republicans are still working on understanding supermarket scanners.

    Speaking of memes, I like the idea of Betty White introing Obama this Thursday. Particularly if she notes Barack never tied his doggie to the roof of his “family” car to drive from Massachusetts to Canada.

    Or she could just hit on him. Either way, I’m cool.

  3. Pennie
    September 3, 2012 - 3:57 pm

    Mike, it might be my current state of mind, but we were there my friend. I’m talking about Grant Park. Chicago. Mayor Daley. HHH. Yeah, that one. I’m just nostalgic and yes, the beatings did continue and the morale and trials that followed…well, maybe you had to be there then.
    Will we have another Florida appropriated result?
    Will Obama stand up and roar?
    Hell, I remember when Jon Voight was a Midnight Cowboy, not a Twilight Token.
    Off tackle left, somebody!

  4. Mike Gold
    September 3, 2012 - 8:32 pm

    Pennie, this will fuck you up seriously. I met Jon Voight only once — in the offices of the Chicago Conspiracy Trial! Voight and Dustin Hoffman were in Chicago promoting Midnight Cowboy and dropped by for a visit.

    Amazing, given Voight’s paranoid ultra-right wing babblings of the past couple decades. Ted Nugent without the bow. He’s no Clint Eastwood. Kelsey Grammer would have done a lot better than Voight, and people know him. People might not have Larry Miller’s name on the tip of their tongues, but he’s smart and funny and not a paranoid nut job… which is why Voight had the gig last week and not Miller or Grammer.

    Ah, for the days of John Ford — guys who were on the right, who were classic Republicans who stood for something other than mindless jingoism and maintained their humanity. On the right and from the right, Ford was one of the very few with the guts to end the Hollywood blacklist.

  5. Reg
    September 3, 2012 - 8:49 pm

  6. Neil C.
    September 3, 2012 - 9:16 pm

    How bad is it when your presidential candidate gets upstaged by an empty chair?

  7. Mike Gold
    September 3, 2012 - 9:45 pm

    It’s not likely to turn any votes — it just robbed the GOP of an opportunity to sell their candidate. The takeaway was Clint, not Mitt.

    Obama’s fanboy response was perfect and right on the money.

    I still want Betty White on Thursday. Maybe she can tie a chair to the roof of her car and drive to Toronto.

    With the turn signal blinking all the way.

    Sorry. I couldn’t help myself.

  8. Reg
    September 3, 2012 - 10:04 pm

    Mike,

    I find it interesting that AMC ran a Eastwood film marathon today.

    And I found that…like Mel Gibson and Michael Richards…I can no longer not see the heart of the real man behind the characters. Thus, I have become…a former fan. Another one bites the dust.

    Mores the pity.

  9. Mike Gold
    September 3, 2012 - 10:29 pm

    Richards, I think, just had a screw loose. It was inconsistent with his overall behavior. Nonetheless, he chose to put himself in the public eye, and that’s an eye that doesn’t blink. He’s vapor.

    Mel is also vapor, but it’s clear from his overall bahavior that his behavior is consistent with his beliefs. For that public behavior we know that he has more than a screw loose: he is a deeply disturbed and dangerous man.

    It’s a shame — in both cases. But that’s the price of celebrity.

    Clint… Well, his work speaks for itself. He is not personally dangerous. I wouldn’t vote for him (he did hold political position at one time), but I won’t have a problem watching his work. He’s entitled to voice his opinion.

    As opposed to that rat bastard Elia Kazan. And even in his case, I continue to listen to the pilot episode of Orson Welles’ Shadow, and I continue to watch A Face In The Crowd… The latter is THAT great. But I spit when Kazan’s credit comes up.

  10. George Haberberger
    September 4, 2012 - 5:13 am

    Mike, I think the election will be closer than either party will be comfortable with. If you only listen to partisans, Romney will win is a landslide or Obama has nothing to worry about.

    I don’t think Eastwood’s speech/comedy routine cut into Rubio’s time. I was following along with the text of his speech that had been released and he didn’t leave anything out. The convention just ran that much longer.

    What do you make of the success of Dinesh D’Souza’s movie 2016? When my wife and I saw it on August 25th, the theater was very crowded. We saw it the first weekend because frankly I thought that would be the only time it would be showing. But it was still in theaters this weekend and by all measures has been doing great for a documentary. And even if it is only preaching to the choir, that choir seems pretty energized. Surely that must give Obama pause.

  11. Neil C.
    September 4, 2012 - 6:05 am

    D’Souza got eviscerated by Bill Maher on his show Friday. Not that I would ever see it, but it seems like a movie made by a spurned lover. It doesn’t seem to have any basis except “Obama is bad!” It seems it’s made to convince those who wouldn’t vote for Obama in the first place to not vote for him.

  12. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 7:50 am

    Haven’t seen 2016 yet, George — or anything else lately. I’m in the run-up for the Baltimore ComicCon this weekend and I’ve got double the columns, plus my other deadlines (including this puppy) and all sorts of stuff. Bitch, bitch. Moan, moan.

    The Republicans are already positioning for 2016. That doesn’t show a lot of confidence. If Obama survives this Friday’s employment numbers, and unless there’s wholesale theft or disenfranchisement, he’ll win. It will be close, but it’s always close in the popular count — usually within a couple points. The electoral collage will also be close, certainly far closer than in 2008, but he’ll get Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, probably Wisconsin and Virginia, probably not North Carolina or Missouri. We’ll see. Everything can change in a heartbeat, although this time I think the lines are pretty well set.

  13. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 8:19 am

    Neil, I think the whole campaign has shaped up that way. Everybody’s trying to make sure their core gets out, everybody seems have given up fighting over the undecideds. We’re poor for that.

    I wonder what D’Souza’s DVD sales will be like. If it comes out soon, the Republicans will buy it up by the cartload and give it out as contribution incentives the way they do with right-wing books… and then brag about all their big sales.

    It’s a very effective fundraising stunt. If you’re ever looking to make a lot of money relatively fast, you can’t go wrong pandering to the right.

  14. Reg
    September 4, 2012 - 10:27 am

    Mike,

    With regard to Clint and his entitled opinion…of course that’s true. I have no problems on that front at all. My burn is with the way that he pandered to the lowest denominators. If ANYONE understands the power of messaging via imagery, it’s Clint.

    I would have had less of a problem with his ‘act of theater’ if he’d chosen to sit while having his dialogue with the Chair. That would have served to at least reflect a modicum of respect for both the man and the office. But instead, he chose with purpose of intent, to give the strongest possible image of ‘massa putting that nigra in his place’.

    This speaks to both his internal heart and mindset. And to me at least, with the power and influence that he wields both in front and behind the scenes, makes him less than benign.

  15. Rick Oliver
    September 4, 2012 - 10:28 am

    Reason Magazine, the unofficial voice of the Libertarian party, eviscerated the film. My favorite quote:

    Odder still is D’Souza’s claim that Obama wanted to close Gitmo because “he sees [jihadis] as freedom fighters.” If so, you have to wonder why Obama keeps killing his “freedom fighters” with remote-controlled robot assassins.

    Full review here:

    http://reason.com/archives/2012/09/04/dinesh-dsouza-is-the-rights-michael-moor?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reason%2FArticles+%28Reason+Online+-+All+Articles+%28except+Hit+%26+Run+blog%29%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

  16. George Haberberger
    September 4, 2012 - 11:02 am

    “But instead, he chose with purpose of intent, to give the strongest possible image of ‘massa putting that nigra in his place’.”

    Yeah I guess no one told Eastwood that any criticism of the president is de facto racism.

    I’m always surprised that people feel no shame in implying that.

    I didn’t vore for Obama in 2008 and I won’t be voting for him in 2012. Am I a racist? Does it matter what my reasons are? Probably not. I was not among the throng of people who wanted to be counted as someone who helped elect the first black president. I wish I could have been. I can understand the feeling of helping to assuage racial tensions.

    For what it is worth, I didn’t and won’t vote for Obama because of his strong Pro-Choice position. But since abortion disproportionately affects the black population, it might be kind of hard to lay that racist charge on me. If abortion was not so prevalent and accepted, (and Planned Parenthood having many more clinics in black neighborhoods certainly helps that opinion), the percentage of the population that is black would be significantly greater.

  17. Rick Oliver
    September 4, 2012 - 11:06 am

    I remain mystified as to what compelled Eastwood to speak at all. He may not like Obama, but he’s hardly representative of what the current Republican Party officially represents. And to the extent that his rambling had any theme at all it was that Obama failed to keep his promises, which is something of a point of pride for the Republicans, since they like to take all the credit for blocking Obama’s insidious secret socialist agenda.

  18. Rick Oliver
    September 4, 2012 - 11:19 am

    George: I hope you recognize that voting based on that single issue will largely constitute a symbolic vote, since federal funding for abortion is already largely (if not entirely) gone and a Republican administration is not likely to be able to make any additional changes regarding the legal status of abortion. They could, of course, waste our tax dollars on a constitutional amendment that they know will fail…along with their constitutional amendment defining marriage — both of which, incidentally, Eastwood opposes.

  19. Reg
    September 4, 2012 - 11:53 am

    George,

    We agree on many points…I think I’ve provided sufficient evidence of my positions in both conservative and liberal strata..but please reread my post. I clearly stated that I had absolutely no problems with Clint voicing his dissatisfaction with President Obama (from a point of policy and performance.) I have a few of my own…Trust.

    But it is Eastwood’s blatant use of disparaging and demeaning imagery and tone with which I take issue. It was purposeful and it absolutely had racist over(and under)tones attached.

    With respect to the President’s public stance on the matter of abortion…I feel you. I am a fervent supporter of LIFE.

    But I’m always challenged by the deafening silence that emanates from those who LIVE on the Right side of the fulcrum when it comes to economic disparity, social disenfranchisement, and racism…all just as important factors for every living human being. For are they not expressions of LIFE as well?

  20. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 11:58 am

    It appears that any criticism of any criticism of Obama made by a white guy is answered with “oh, yeah, sure, any criticism of the president is de facto racism, huh, huh?” That’s cheap, that’s easy, that’s stupid, that’s ridiculously defensive, and that’s totally incorrect.

    But, just to prove we’re not racists, let’s pass a constitutional amendment requiring ALL people in America to carry their raised-seal birth certificates at ALL times, to be inspected at whim by any and all local, county, state and federal officials. Then we won’t have anything to point to, right?

  21. Rick Oliver
    September 4, 2012 - 12:38 pm

    How 20th century of you, Mike. I thought we were all going to get implanted microchips. It’s part of Obama’s secret agenda to identify those who disagree with him so that they can be rounded up and thrown in the secret FEMA detention camps that will be run by U.N. forces. But not to worry, soon after that Jesus will return to lift the chosen bodily to heaven.

  22. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 1:46 pm

    There’s a new sun
    Risin’ up angry in the sky
    And there’s a new voice
    Sayin’ we’re not afraid to die
    Let the old world make believe
    It’s blind and deaf and dumb
    But nothing can change the shape of things to come

  23. Neil C.
    September 4, 2012 - 2:14 pm

    Another thing I don’t get, the right-wing bleating that Obama has become a ‘dictator.’? How? And do they ever remember how Bush expanded executive power (I know, I know, don’t bring up the past, except Jimmy Carter) and what their side proposes? The GOP is more authoritarian than any liberal would ever dream of!

  24. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 2:43 pm

    You know, Jimmy Carter will be speechafying at the DNC — via satellite. Bush was the 600 pound gorilla who WASNT at the RNC.

    However, Obama is a dictator because he’s FORCING people not to die. That Kenyan bastard.

  25. Reg
    September 4, 2012 - 3:12 pm

    Ummm…Mike…I think you meant to say…’That Black Kenyan (for double emphasis) Half-Breed’…

    yeah I know…illogical and contradictory, but whatcha gonna do?

  26. George Haberberger
    September 4, 2012 - 3:55 pm

    Rick: “I hope you recognize that voting based on that single issue will largely constitute a symbolic vote, …”

    Yes but every vote is symbolic of something. And of course whoever is president has the opportunity to nominate Supreme Court judges.

    Reg: I just thought Eastwood stood at the podium because that is where every other speaker stood. And he had an empty chair because… well he needed something to represent Obama. I guess another podium could have been brought out or as a friend of mine suggested, a teleprompter. I really do not think there was any racial implication to the empty chair. And it is nice to know there is another Pro-Life participant on these boards. There are so few I really should know the ones that are.

    MIke: Really? Cheap, easy and stupid? That sounds like a personal ad.
    I do not apologize for the comment. Critics of president HAVE been called racist in an attempt to stifle that criticism.

  27. Whitney
    September 4, 2012 - 6:30 pm

    Golden Boy –

    Need to confess that I still need more time in the oven (or crucible): I just saw “Face in the Crowd” for the first time. I can’t wait to watch it ten more times to unpeel the layers and learn something.

    I’m even thinking of learning guitar at the expense of my L.A. manicure. Andy Griffith was anointed, even as a bad guy.

  28. Reg
    September 4, 2012 - 7:33 pm

    George,

    Yes, I’ve been in a couple of minor dust ups in these here parts with respect to that most volatile of topics, but the far greater portions have been mutually respectful of the other’s opinions. Especially as I fully acknowledge that I was not gifted with the necessary plumbing, while also striving to always give attention to the absolute beauty and treasure that is human life…in it’s most pure and innocent state.

    As far as Eastwood’s slippin’ into darkness, one must always remember that in Hollywood..”Image(ry) is everything.” Either the use of a podium (with a faux seal) or teleprompter (both easily obtainable) would have at least implied that interviewer and target of rebuke were on the same level of discourse. Having the first African American President of the United States being talked down to by AN ACTOR…was absolutely done with great purpose.

  29. Reg
    September 4, 2012 - 7:41 pm

    Also, as my earlier question asked…Isn’t (or shouldn’t)the heartbeat of being Pro-Life encompass more than the tragedy of aborting human fetuses?

  30. Reg
    September 4, 2012 - 8:19 pm

    Slightly off topic…Just listened to Michelle Obama’s speech…

    To quote the 5 Guys guy…”OH MY DAYUM.”

  31. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 8:28 pm

    George — Yes, “Cheap, easy and stupid” was a cut-and-paste from my most recent personal ad. That has nothing to do with my argument. It’s just that Fred Willard has made it so damn difficult to go to the movies…

  32. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 8:38 pm

    Reg, funny thing. I was in an email conversation with our friend and frequent commenter Pennie and, while I won’t burden everybody with a trillion words of (exciting) backstory, our dialog caused me to consider this point:

    Using a defibrillator actually stops the heart. It literally kills the patient in the hope that the heart might restart. The doctor or EMS worker or, now, informed citizen is actually killing the person having a heart attack.

    If one is pro-life, shouldn’t one be anti-defibrillation? Acknowledging the possibility of extenuating circumstances is a slippery slope. For those who allow no exceptions when it comes to abortion (such as rape, incest, or the life of the woman), wouldn’t it be consistent to be similarly opposed to defibrillation? You’re killing a living organism; in this case, one that was indisputably “born.”

    After all, it doesn’t always work. It certainly didn’t help my late wife any.

  33. Mike Gold
    September 4, 2012 - 8:41 pm

    Whitney, Andy Griffith was an actor of amazing talent and his performance in “Face In The Crowd” is nothing short of breathtaking. There were other truly amazing movies around that time — “Sweet Smell of Success” is right up there — but “Face In The Crowd” is on my VERY short list. The one with Casablanca on top.

  34. Pennie
    September 5, 2012 - 3:45 pm

    Mike, you had me eons ago. You know that. Okay, hopeless romantic me cant help myself. There’s Casablanca and all else. I’m aware of Kane and the case for it. But, nothing does it like the best. Casablanca.

  35. Mike Gold
    September 5, 2012 - 7:32 pm

    I agree with you about Citizen Kane. It’s actually every bit as good as its reputation. But Casablanca has just a touch more magic.

    Batman movie producer Mike Uslan, who’s a good guy, once said Casablanca is as close to a perfect movie as it comes. Truer words were never spoken.

  36. Pennie
    September 5, 2012 - 8:31 pm

    When people talk movies at the highest level, and the drift goes to, ” Gee, I never saw that…I probably should, ” the conversation for me is over.

  37. Reg
    September 6, 2012 - 11:12 am

    Sorry Mike…just getting the bandwidth to address your post.

    With respect to your question…my opinion is that if one’s sanctioned actions are ultimately intended to sustain, protect, or encourage life…it falls in the pro category.

    But as far as the other… No words can suffice, brother…other than to state…I remain deeply sorry.

  38. Reg
    September 6, 2012 - 11:21 am

    With regards to the differences between the two conventions, nothing could reflect a clearer delineation than the last two nights.

    From the sheer diversity reflected in the crowds, to the tone and resonant electricity that came from the speakers…

    Julian Castro – Caliente

    Michelle Obama – Habanero!

    Liz Warren – Deep

    Emanuel Cleaver – Took folks to CHUURCH!

    Still Bill – Brought the napalm.

  39. Mike Gold
    September 6, 2012 - 12:03 pm

    Both conventions preach to the choir. Unless we go back to the days of the smoke-filled rooms (for which I’m nostalgic, but only from an aesthetic point of view) it’s been decades since we’ve had a convention that was anything more than an infomercial. And one that’s just as easy to avoid.

    Nice speeches, particularly from Michelle and Bill (damn, that guy’s really our first rock-n-roll president), but it’s mostly Macbeth’s sound and fury signifying nothing.

    Hey, at least I dropped the “tale told by an idiot” prefix.

  40. Reg
    September 6, 2012 - 3:06 pm

    Oh it’s definitely nothing but Bread and Circuses…with the emphasis on the circus acts. Hollywood has assumed the reins…Now if only we could get a hand on some good sunglasses.

    Now if you moviephiles get that reference, a ‘No Prize’ will be winging its way to you post-haste.

Comments are closed.