Master Debater, by Arthur Tebbel – Pop Art #199 | @MDWorld
Dear Art,
With the first debates of the Presidential election coming up this week I’ve been preparing around the clock. I wish my camp could keep a closer lid on some of our prep. A story came out this week that said my team “has concluded that debates are about creating moments and has equipped him with a series of zingers that he has memorized and has been practicing on aides since August” and now I don’t know how effective that strategy can be. It’s one thing to try and lure a person in to a trap; it’s a completely different thing to tell them the trap is coming. Should this story leaking change my strategy?
-Mitt Romney, former governor of Massachusetts and cartoon rich person
Mitt,
I hate to admit this but your strategy people might be geniuses. How are most people going to get information on this debate? By watching it live? Of course not, they’ll watch the news later that night or the next day. The news won’t be showing long quotes on policy they’ll show quick clips. If you could get the president with a couple good zingers you could dominate the coverage after and create the illusion that you won the debate regardless of how the rest of that debate went. You could act like the world’s worst boxer and get hit by hundreds of jabs while you wind up for an out-of-control haymaker; if you connect you’ll win the fight.
As someone who fancies himself as a bit of a comedian I have to warn you that you aren’t going to get anywhere with memorized zingers that you’ve been practicing for two months. Comedy, especially the kind where you respond directly to something someone says before you, has to appear spontaneous. If you’re going out there with some memorized line and the president says something just a little different than what you expected then you’ll look incredibly awkward. You know what incredibly awkward feels like and, I assure you, it looks awful on film. When I see you at sporting events I’m surprised you aren’t running to take over the Dunder Mifflin office in Scranton.
I don’t think you have any other choice for this debate. You have basically no chance of coming off as more prepared or informed than Barack Obama. He’s a sharp guy and, more importantly, has cultivated one hell of a reputation as a speaker and a debater. I can’t even remember if it’s deserved. The only moment I remember from the 2008 debates is John McCain making that terribly confused face when he couldn’t find his mark or something. If you go for slow boring policy talk you’re basically playing for a tie. Try your zingers try to make the president look foolish as that is your only chance to make a real dent in this race on Wednesday. It seems desperate but, then again, your campaign looks a little desperate right now. I’d wish you luck but I sort of think this attitude is counter to the resurgence of serious discourse in American politics. Just don’t talk about raincoats again.

![[Facebook]](http://mdwp.malibulist.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[MySpace]](http://mdwp.malibulist.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Twitter]](http://mdwp.malibulist.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://mdwp.malibulist.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)

October 3rd, 2012 at 8:55 am
Or trees.
October 3rd, 2012 at 3:56 pm
Here’s where the Republicans’ comparative lack of support within the entertainment industry hurts them. Obama can avail himself of all sorts of first-class gag writers. Al Franken has been supplying gags to Clinton long, long before he became senator of the Bachmann state. The GOP simply doesn’t have anybody of that caliber. Their idea of funny is Rush Limbaugh.
Well, to be fair, Rush is MY idea of funny as well.
October 4th, 2012 at 6:01 am
“You have basically no chance of coming off as more prepared or informed than Barack Obama. He’s a sharp guy and, more importantly, has cultivated one hell of a reputation as a speaker and a debater.”
You were talking about a Barack Obama who did not show up last night. What the heck just happened? You know the guy did badly when Andrew Sullivan, Chris Matthews, James Carville, Michael Moore, Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow don’t even TRY to pretend he won.
October 4th, 2012 at 6:11 am
Right, it was good to see Mitt Romney taking my advice and being able to score some points against the president. Happy to help really. I don’t think he got there by underestimating his opponent coming into the debate.
October 4th, 2012 at 6:56 am
Nope. But telling Big Bird he’s going to send him to Chick-fil-a was a mistake. The majority of voters were raised by the Bird, and they’ve got THIER kids planted in front of the guy. Or gal. I could never tell which; I wasn’t raised on the show. Hell, I’m still having trouble figuring out the gender of Tweety Bird.
Who’s one ugly bastard.
October 4th, 2012 at 7:25 am
Tweety Bird is male.
You’re welcome.
October 4th, 2012 at 8:43 am
George — I suspected as much, but never knew for sure. Thanks!
October 4th, 2012 at 8:57 am
I watched the debate, but since I was doing laundry during the same time frame, I missed some of the middle portions of it. So afterwards, I clicked around to MSNBC, CNN and Fox to see if my overall assessment was correct.
It was.
I don’t know what happened, but Obama was ill at ease through most of it, and either not well-prepared, or he only has a superficial understanding of certain economic issues.
Honestly, I think it’s the latter, because, as I said in a different thread, in many respects, he’s the most laissez faire president I’ve seen in my lifetime. He does not meet with his cabinet members on a regular basis, and he apparently regularly waves off reading briefings I would never pass up on if I were the guy in the Oval Office.
The result? As anyone who went to college knows, if you don’t fundamentally understand a subject going into a mid-term or final exam, all the last-minute cramming in the world won’t help you — even if it’s an open-book test!
October 4th, 2012 at 1:13 pm
George… I believe you, honest, but… how do you know?
When Obama flew to Denver, he left his balls in Air Force One. I stand behind my oft-made comment over in B.O.B. that there’s little if any viable uncommitted vote, and Wilfred’s attacking Big Bird by name was a mistake (kill PBS, fine; kill Big Bird and you’re desecrating most voters’ childhoods). But the only two REAL losers were Jim Lehrer, whose mostly retired anyway, and Al Gore, who blamed Obama’s lame performance on his not being acclimatized to Denver’s thin air. Al, baby… just… go talk to Big Bird.
October 4th, 2012 at 1:50 pm
Mike wrote: “…and Al Gore, who blamed Obama’s lame performance on his not being acclimatized to Denver’s thin air.”
???
Holy cow! I thought you were kidding until I Googled it!
The guy was 500 votes from the presidency, and now he’s Mr. Irrelevant, channeling Jesse Ventura. Oh my, how the mighty have fallen!