MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

You Make Me Sick, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld

October 26, 2014 Martha Thomases 11 Comments

ebola-cartoon-resizedLast winter, what with the heavy snow and the darkness and my particular brain chemistry, I turned into something of a hermit.  If I didn’t have to leave the house, I didn’t want to.  It was me and the cat and Judge Judy.  I was oddly content, not lonely but convinced I had all the answers.

It’s not healthy.  Maybe it was what I needed to do, the second year of my grieving, but it’s not a lifestyle I recommend for anyone looking to enjoy oneself to the fullest.  I think of it as a mental juice fast.

We seem to be going through the same thing as a nation.  And we should be just as cautious about getting stuck in the bathroom.

Are you worried about ebola?  I’m not.  Apparently, lots of people are. If you watch the network news, we’re all about to die.  The cable news is even worse.

In point of fact, it’s actually quite difficult to catch the ebola virus.  You pretty much have to be up to your elbows in vomit, urine, blood or shit, which is why the Americans who have tested positive all work in medical professions.

More people die every year from the flu, from not wearing seatbelt, and from gun accidents.  None of these is a topic of hysteria on the news.

Ebola is, however, and it’s worth discussing why.

I think, like so many problems we face in the United States, this has it’s roots in racism.  Ebola is a gruesome killer brought in from Africa, the Dark Continent.  It’s only in a few places in Africa, but that hasn’t prevented us from acting like complete lunatics.  The more hysterical among our politicians, Republican and Democrat, call for an end to flights to the affected areas, as if this will somehow prevent the disease from getting in.  Clearly, they aren’t watching The Strain, a very entertaining demonstration about why quarantines don’t work on a global scale.  Sure, maybe an infected person can’t fly from Liberia to the United States, but nothing stops that person from going to Spain, perhaps, infecting someone, and then that person, with no Liberia on his passport, could come and go as he pleases.

We don’t want to be isolationists who shun the rest of the world, sitting in our metaphorical apartments in our metaphorical bathrobes.  We want to put on metaphorical pants and be part of the world.  We might even be able to help.

You know what would be effective against ebola?  A vaccine.  There is one that might work, one that has been ready for testing for several years now.  It hasn’t been made available because the final round of tests was determined to be too expensive for the drug companies involved.  A medicine that would only be useful to poor Africans would not be the money-maker demanded by our for-profit health-care system.

So a few thousand Africans die needlessly.  At least the shareholders didn’t lose their dividends.

I don’t know why this isn’t an international scandal.  I don’t know why there aren’t criminal charges being brought against these corporations.  I don’t know why the so-called “pro-life” movement isn’t picketing them with the same fervor they demonstrate outside my doctor’s offices.

You’d almost think that the tiny fraction of the richest people and corporations in the country was trying to distract us by pitting us against each other.  You’d think they want us to forget what’s important until at least after the mid-term elections.

Don’t forget to vote.  And get your flu shot.

Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, spends too much of her life avoiding vomit, shit, blood and saliva.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Neil C.
    October 26, 2014 - 7:20 am

    Here’s what amazes me: Ebola scares the shit out of us. ISIS will all come over here and behead us or what not. Another shooting in a school: Meh, it’s the price of freedom.

  2. Ed Sedarbaum
    October 26, 2014 - 9:59 am

    I did enjoy seeing Cuomo play second fiddle to DeBlasio at their press conference. But then Cuomo got back at DeBlasio by declaring his own quarantine with Christie. Now there’s a pair for you: Cuomo and Christie.

  3. George Haberberger
    October 26, 2014 - 12:24 pm

    “I don’t know why there aren’t criminal charges being brought against these corporations.”
    What should they be charged with?

  4. R. Maheras
    October 26, 2014 - 12:33 pm

    The fact that there was no readily available Ebola vaccine is the racist U.S.’s for-profit medical system.

    Boy, do I call bullshit on THIS nonsensical liberal meme.

    Let’s analyze this charge for a few seconds. How many times during the Obamacare debate did liberals point to the inherent “superiority” of mostly socialist-style healthcare systems around the world? Countless millions, I’d hazard to guess.

    And now, when a relatively new disease pops up, the reason the world didn’t have a vaccine stockpile available is the fault of the racist U.S. for-profit healthcare system?

    The frickin’ mind boggles!

    Why didn’t Norway’s much-vaunted socialist healthcare system have a vaccine in the hopper? Or England’s, Sweden’s, France’s or Germany’s? Or Saudi Arabia’s? Or India’s? Or China’s? Or any system in Africa? Or South America?

    Why is the U.S. healthcare system at fault? A system, by the way, which liberals abhor, and trying their damnedest to dismantle and make like all of the medical systems mentioned above.

    Un-frickin’-real.

    And who’s currently poised to field one of the most promising Ebola vaccines? a for-profit company, GlaxoSmithKline, that’s who.

    The fact is, of all the diseases out there that kill people, Ebola was way, way down the list. Meaning limited resources were focusing on much more imminent and dangerous disease threats. And even though Ebola was first identified relatively recently as diseases go (1976), there HAS been vaccines being developed for many years — some quite promising, and just requiring FDA approval for use in humans.

    But since everything is about race according to many in the liberal community, if anyone had dared during previous outbreaks to suggest fast-tracking the vaccine usage in West Africa without the much slower standard clinical trials on humans, cries of racism and using the poor as Guinea pigs would have been the immediate outcry — as if letting West Africans die is somehow a more acceptable option.

    Damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

  5. George Haberberger
    October 26, 2014 - 2:06 pm

    Wow Russ. And I thought “What should they be charged with?” was a stinging riposte.

  6. Susan Kent Cakars
    October 28, 2014 - 10:53 am

    I’d agree that drug company policies are motivated by financial rather and racist considerations. And I know they develop drugs and vaccines for diseases that occur only or mostly in Africa, even when not profitable. However, I suspect that racism is one of the roots of the panic we are seeing these days. This seems particularly so in cases of people from African countries with no ebola outbreak being harassed, fired, or even beaten up as two 11- and 13-year-old boys recently were–a particularly stupid response if you are worried about a disease that can be transmitted through blood but not through the air. Mean-spiritedness and xenophobia–and Americans’ infamous ignorance of geography–can of course exist without racism, but in the USA it is never far from the surface.

  7. Rene
    October 28, 2014 - 12:13 pm

    There is in Africa a sort of damned if you do damned if you don’t thing, like Russ said. Unlike Russ, I don’t think the ugly intersection between capitalism and medical care is blameless. Free market does many things well, health care is not one of them.

    But I don’t think there is an easy solution there. There IS a sort of general disinterest in Africa, by everybody, conservatives or liberals, except in moments of catastrophe. Conservatives usually don’t care about those that are different from themselves, and Liberals usually don’t care about those who aren’t being actively victimized by people who are like themselves. One is motivated by selfishness, the other by guilt.

    In other words, if it’s just dark-skinned Africans making other dark-skinned Africans miserable, or just dark-skinned Africans in general being miserable, people in the West don’t give a damn, usually.

    It there were some white(r) guys there actively victimizing them, like what happens in Israel then yeah, you could have seen a lot of support by Liberals, and a lot of support by Conservatives (for the white and/or whiter guys).

  8. Mindy Newell
    October 29, 2014 - 10:06 am

    You hit everything on the nose, Martha! And I’m saying this as a health professional who has been inundated with meetings and workshops about Ebola.

  9. Mindy Newell
    October 29, 2014 - 10:10 am

    @ Russ: Martha is right about the financial interests of Big Pharm. I am telling you this as a health professional.

    There is also major concern in the health field (at least by us “front-liners”) that Big Pharm is NOT DOING ANY R & D FOR NEW ANTIBIOTICS because their god-damned stockholders and Boards of Directors refuse to make anything in which there is not direct and mucho profit.

    There is an excellent documentary about this on FRONTLINE (PBS) which you can watch if you care to….

    The resistance to current antibiotics is MUCH MORE DANGEROUS to the world than Ebola.

  10. R, Maheras
    October 29, 2014 - 11:12 am

    Mindy — I know Big Pharm is profit-driven and may not have the same priorities as the real world. But the fact is, they are pretty good at what they do, and socialized medicine is the tail trying to wag the dog. And the simple reason is that socialized medicine rarely appears to have the money to invest in the large scale R & D necessary to tackle some illnesses. They focus primarily on universal care provided to a certain government-established standard, and simply do not have the resources, expertise and personnel to do the type of things Big Pharm does.

    I think that’s why there are still for-profit drug companies even in places where socialized medicine is prevalent — such as the UK. Socialized medicine didn’t make them go away, and if they did, there’d probably be nothing to fill the void.

    And you are absolutely right about the problem of resistance to antibiotics. But I disagree that Big Pharm is not doing anything about creating new ones because their shareholders won’t let them. After all, creating new antibiotics that would be effective against current drug-resistant strains would be like printing money — something shareholders would welcome. I think there are simply too many technological and scientific hurdles to do so. If there weren’t, some of the smaller research labs would have cracked the code on them.

  11. George Haberberger
    October 29, 2014 - 11:51 am

    Gee Rene, you make such an even handed observation that liberals and conservatives believe much the same thing but liberals arrive there because of guilt and conservatives because of selfishness. Really! I reject that theory in its entirety.
    As I believe I had posted on this site before, I would not accept the Capulet’s opinion about the Montegues, Javert’s opinion about Jean Valjean or Lex Luthor’s opinion about Superman.

  12. Rene
    October 29, 2014 - 12:45 pm

    George –

    Our “enemies” sometimes have the ability to see us more clearly, because they’re not blinded by our own self-aggrandizing fantasies and rationalizations. Actually, that is maybe why they’re perceived as enemies. No one likes that guy that pokes holes in your fantasy (i.e. Luthor may have something interesting to say about Superman).

    But I don’t believe I said liberal and conservatives believe the same thing. Only that they both don’t really care about Africa. It’s not as “sexy” as other international hotsposts for the connoisseurs of political controversy.

    In any case, clear political positions more and more look to me like psychological defense mechanisms for the middle class people with too many time on their hands.

    The conservative mind needs to believe the world is basically fair, and needs to be “conserved”. The libertarian subclass believes free markets are fair and they’re affluent because they deserve to be (libertarians who are dirty poor are very few). “I live a comfortable life and I deserve it, damnit.” It’s what lies behind all their theories.

    The progressive mind is more or less the same, only they need to believe the world is basically unfair, and needs to be “progressed”. The defense mechanism goes more like this. “I live a comfortable life and I don’t deserve it, but at least I know I don’t deserve it and lucked out, I’m nice like that.”

    And conservatives and progressives don’t like each other much because they’re always puncturing each other’s defense mechanisms.

    But the world is too complicated to be termed as fair or unfair, to be labelled in need of outright conservation or progress. To really understand a lot of those issues you need a lot of study, a lot of time, and a lot of dedication, instead of just sitting in our homes, writting stuff on the Internet.

    Our maybe I just woke in a foul mood.

  13. Martha Thomases
    October 29, 2014 - 12:50 pm

    Rene, you’re a lovely human being, but I reject your analysis. I’m a liberal/progressive/leftist because I believe that people are basically good and can be redeemed if they make mistakes. I know of none of my fellow who believe what we believe out of guilt. That includes the Jewish ones.

  14. George Haberberger
    October 29, 2014 - 1:22 pm

    Rene:
    My father was a conservative and he did not live a “comfortable life”. As a farmer, he rarely made enough money in a year to brag about, being subject to the whims of weather and commodities prices.

    And your theory about progressives: “I live a comfortable life and I don’t deserve it, but at least I know I don’t deserve it and lucked out, I’m nice like that.” makes them sound absolutely neurotic. You might be on to something there.

    Martha:
    “That includes the Jewish ones.”
    And the Catholic ones.

  15. Mindy Newell
    October 29, 2014 - 3:49 pm

    Russ, please, please, please watch that FRONTLINE documentary. Then let’s discuss, ‘kay?

    Meant in all good will!!!!!

  16. Mindy Newell
    October 29, 2014 - 3:50 pm

    @ Renee: Actually, U.S. foreign policy is very concerned with Africa because China is making vast economic inroads into the various countries that make up the continent.

  17. Mindy Newell
    October 29, 2014 - 3:54 pm

    At everybody:

    Ebola, and other infectious diseases, including MERSA, TB, VERSA, and all the other lovely and deadly “plagues” caused by viruses and bacteria, doesn’t give a damn if you’re a Democrat, a Republican, a Libertarian, a liberal, a conservative, non-committed, Jewish, Catholic, Mormon, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist or any other religion, nor atheist.

    Get over it!

Comments are closed.