Stop Dragging My Heart Around, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise
April 10, 2010 Martha Thomases 8 Comments
According to my network television news, there is an epidemic of bullying in this country. It’s new, sexy bullying because the Internet is involved. Kids not only taunt each other at school, but on Facebook and other social networking sites.
The most horrific story led to a student committing suicide. With this story out in the open, there were soon more reports of suicide in children, some as young as nine years old. There is now talk about criminalizing bullying.
I don’t think that is going to work.
As a progressive, I’m frequently in favor of getting the government involved in all sorts of things: healthcare, emergency rescue services, fire fighting, hate crime fighting, roads and mass transportation, even the occasional parade. However, I don’t think there’s a single person who can be accused of a criminal activity in these cases.
As a child, I wasn’t bullied, so maybe I have no authority to speak on this subject. I was hazed a bit, and sometimes felt excluded from groups I wanted to include me, but, for the most part, I was too inconsequential to elicit such strong feelings in others. Neither was I knowingly a bully, although I did push my little sister around because that’s what older sisters do. So maybe I don’t have any credibility on this issue.
However, I did have suicidal thoughts as a kid, and I read Lord of the Flies and recognized in it people I knew. And, as a mother, I saw how kids behave on playgrounds, for good and for ill.
Bullying doesn’t happen in a vacuum. To mix metaphors, it’s a soup with an infinitely variable recipe. Start with a kid who feels helpless and ignored. Add another kid who appears to be weak. Season with adults who don’t care, and add a dash of peer pressure. Voila! Bully!
Sometimes the bully is him or herself bullied by a parent, and learns the behavior at home. Sometimes the parents’ prejudices feed the bullying, so that members of minority groups get pummeled. Sometimes adults in authority believe that kids need to work these disputes out for themselves.
I confess that I sometimes think kids need to work things out themselves. One of the most important elements in any kind of children’s play is arguing about the rules. However, I formed this opinion in a simpler time, when kids played together with few electronic aids. You can argue about the rules for a game on the playground. It’s more difficult to argue about rules for a video game.
We didn’t let our son play with video games in our home when he was in elementary school. We knew he was playing at his friends’ homes, but we had our own rules. I didn’t like the rigidity of the games at the time (late 1980s to mid-1990s). I thought they were violent and dehumanizing. That can be entertaining, I know, but its the kind of entertainment I thought should be reserved for those old enough to understand how reality worked.
Instead, especially before kindergarten, we played things that taught empathy. We fed the squirrels. We played restaurant and made up silly dishes to put on the menu.
Super hero comic books are great for teaching empathy. So many characters are secretly dweebs.
So, who should go to jail when someone is a bully? I’m all for the bully suffering consequences for his or her actions, but I don’t think jail is the right punishment. Instead, something that teaches empathy would be better. Community service of some kind, maybe. Role playing to see what it feels like, all the way around.
In the meantime, let’s broaden our definition of bullying. For example, this case, for some reason, didn’t get included in the hysterical news stories to which I referred earlier. It seems to me to be precisely that, however. The kids who set it up are bullies, and so are their parents, who clearly helped them to do so. Maybe in their communities, it’s not bullying if it’s gays and lesbians.
It’s all fun and games until someone loses a life.
Media Goddess Martha Thomases used all her will power not to title this column, Wooly Bully.
John Tebbel
April 10, 2010 - 12:40 pm
Anything that leads to grown ups paying more attention to what children are saying and doing is good with me.
What would Fred Rogers do?
Howard Cruse
April 10, 2010 - 2:29 pm
I don’t know where jail fits into the picture, but a harsh glaring spotlight should be thrown on teachers or administrators who let bullying go on in front of them without some form of intervention. I was bullied in junior high and didn’t feel safe in school, and that shouldn’t have happened. Feeling scared works against a productive educational environment.
Cyber-bullying and after-school bullying complicate the “teachers-as-protectors” paradigm. It still calls for intervention if it comes to light, though. I like your “community service and empathy training” approach more than throwing kids into the slammer, though.
Mike Gold
April 10, 2010 - 5:29 pm
I know my attitude tends to annoy the politically correct, but there’s a very conservative philosophy that is 100% right-on: you stand up to bullies, period. Bullies exist, bullies always existed, and today for some stupid reason we blame and persecute their victims.
Every child should learn martial arts, for a whole lot of reasons: respect for others, self-discipline, and self-defense. If every six year old started martial arts, boys and girls and men and women would be victimized less. It’s just that simple. Mutual Armed Defense works.
John Tebbel
April 11, 2010 - 6:48 am
First, “politically correct” is a Newt-speak insult designed to marginalize an idea by incorrectly linking it to the Mao-ist tyrant-language used to ram Communism down China’s throat.
Politically correct, in our beloved English language, means something that most people believe and will support. Therefore, each and every thing referred to with the Newt-speak insult “politically correct” is, indeed, the opposite, a necessary idea that runs counter to a popularly supported, dead end shibboleth. E.g. Tolerant behavior is insulted as politically correct but intolerance is clearly our American religion.
So in this case, the attitude termed “politically correct” is actually a minority opinion running counter to the violence-based suppositions that have gotten us in the hole we grovel in. “Fight back to that bully” is as treasured an American fairy tale as Cinderella and just as useless and just as cruel, ready to destroy our society one innocent at a time.
I don’t think Fred Rogers ever learned self-defense or needed to. But I forgot. He’s a joke. Can you say, “I work for peace?” Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
Mike Gold
April 11, 2010 - 12:06 pm
With all due respect, John, I don’t care who created the term “politically correct.” However, the term well predates Newt: it was in general use by both the New Left and the Weather Underground by 1969, and my buddy Bobby London (who’s also Martha’s buddy, if not indeed yours as well) used it dramatically in his Merton of the Movement comix. From those platforms it grew into a life of its own as our language tends to do, and I refuse to surrender it to Newt Gingrich or to anybody on the right or left just because they find it useful. We share a common language, one that is fraught with wonderful irony.
Minority opinions are not only protected by the Bill of Rights, but by logic and fair play. Moreover, we do not know what the majority opinion may be in the self-defense issue. Just because parents let the schools get away with their mindless zero tolerance policies where honor students get thrown out of school because their parents packed an apple-corer with their lunch, that doesn’t mean the majority of people in this nation are pacifists.
Fred Rogers was not a joke, although, honestly, his sweater was. And for all I know, he was every bit the martial arts enthusiast that Denny O’Neil, Denys Cowan, Mike Baron and many other non-violent funny book folks are.
We do not live in a fantasy world where the pure of heart do not get physically molested. We live in a world where the weak are preyed upon by the noxious.
Most important, working for peace does not mean laying down and dying. I am anti-war; I am NOT and have never been a pacifist. By studying martial arts we’re not destroying innocents, we’re teaching them respect for others, self-discipline and self-defense.
Today’s children, raised by OUR generation of parents, are sadly lacking in respect for others and self-discipline. All too many can see no further than their sense of entitlement.
John Tebbel
April 12, 2010 - 8:17 am
I can’t get my reply under 50,000 words.
Mike Gold
April 12, 2010 - 9:02 am
There’s a 50,000 word limit?
Damn!
Whitney
April 14, 2010 - 2:19 pm
Mike Gold and Martha –
Physical training in schools, perhaps martial arts particularly, could help solve a Fistful of Furious Problems. Physical fitness is a crying crisis in our youth right now. The sense of accomplishment and relative control that can come from mastering a physical discipline could be a magic pill for the both the victims and the perpetrators.
Plus, physical training deters violence. Our biggest and most fit guys at the club tend to be the ones that have the least incidents. The smaller the security guard, the more complicated the night…