MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Welcome to the Working Week, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise

January 10, 2009 Martha Thomases 16 Comments

d1325will-work-for-money-posters.jpgToday is the last day of the first full week of 2009.  It’s been revelatory.

Before the New Year, I wasn’t trying very hard to find a new job.  My resume needed work, and I didn’t think anyone would be hiring until after the holidays.  Starting Monday, January 5, I had no excuse.  I had to get serious.

This is so discouraging.

The unemployment rate is the highest it’s been since the early 1940s, when we fought a World War to lower it.  Now, we’ve got two wars going, and unemployment is still going up. We’re going to need a better way to bring it down.

Obama is, in my opinion, saying a lot of the right things.  We need to invest in this country, both to provide jobs and to improve the quality of American lives for the next century.  We need our roads and bridges rebuilt.  We need more schools for students of all ages.  We need renewable energy sources.

This is all well and good, but what’s in it for me?

Here’s the thing.  When I was a girl, I wanted to be a poet, or a cowgirl.  Neither of those career paths was appropriate, either because I lived in the wrong century or lacked the relevant talents, or both.  For a while, I wanted to be crusading leftist attorney, like Zalman King in The Young Lawyers, but then I found out that the law was not just arguing about important political issues but rather a lot of boring, thankless work like writing contracts, and I didn’t want to do that anymore.

My next ambition was to be a writer.  I wanted to put words together in new and exciting ways that revealed new insights into the human soul.  That’s the one that stuck.

For more than 30 years, I’ve been a professional writer.  Luckily, it’s something in demand by all kinds of professions, and gets more valuable as school standards get lower.  I tell stories.  I make people laugh.  Sometimes, I persuade them to see a different point of view.  That’s why they pay me the big bucks.

money.jpgMy resume is full of good things I’ve done, things that entertained the world (writing for magazines like the National Lampoon and Spy) and things that made people think (promoting the Get Set Club with the Ms. Foundation for Women) and things that made people a lot of money (publicizing the death of Superman and his subsequent marriage).  I should be a hot property.

Where is the love?

It’s tough to put yourself on the line, looking for a job.  You have to put on professional clothes that usually involve at least one element that’s uncomfortable (a necktie, for example, or pantyhose).  You have to put a smile on your face and act confident.  You have to pretend you don’t really need the job, but you’re so interested that you’ll make changes to your life to accommodate the needs of your prospective employer.  You have to wave away the suggestion that you might want your nights and weekends for your family or your friends, because you’ll be so wrapped up in your new job that you won’t want to do anything with them anymore.

Unemployment is high, so employers can lowball their offers.  They can hire two people to each work a 60 hour week (no overtime because you’re salaried, and no comp time because that would show you weren’t dedicated to the company) instead of three people to work the more humane (and legal) 40 hours.

Don’t get me wrong.  I want a job.  I want the routine to structure my days.  I want the satisfaction that comes from accomplishing something by working with motivated people.  I want health insurance.

Mostly, I want to be part of this team that Obama’s putting together to make things better.  They don’t seem to want an entertainment publicist, but I could totally make their case to congress.  Who needs lobbyists when you can have the Spin Queen?

Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, will happily send her resume to any prospective employers who might be reading this.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. pennie
    January 10, 2009 - 8:00 am

    Darlin’ you know we’re in the same place, i.e. for the moment, stuck and subject to turbulent and sometimes unsettling forces way beyond our control. While that may be true most of the time, right now it is starkly frightening in its scope and breadth. We could do sooooo much for those folks in DC (the location, not the company–although they could use us as well!). They just don’t know it.

    You’re in PR. I am a PR. Right now that stands for Poor Relation. Is it any comfort there are more than 15 million of us souls w/o work–or work so pitiful it is demeaning and shouldn’t count. This ain’t even close to over…

    Is it sufficient that we are loved, appreciated, and not on the street corner–at least for now? I’m relying on that and Obama to kick ass. And trying desperately to keep my sense of humor. What can a poor girl do, but sing in a RnR band…

    You are just a wonderful woman who is appreciated by so many. Like Rosie and the Romantics sang, “Our Day Will Come.”
    pennie

  2. Liz
    January 10, 2009 - 10:12 am

    Obama should be so lucky!

  3. Russ Rogers
    January 10, 2009 - 11:36 am

    You did publicity for the Death and Marriage of Superman! Your dream job is to be part of the team that Obama’s putting together to save the nation (save the world). I’ve seen pictures of Obama pulling off his jacket and shirt to reveal the blue tights with a red “O” on his chest. Other people have made the Obama/Superman comparison. Obama himself has said he’s from the planet Krypton! There IS a connection here. Let’s face it, Obama needs your skills.

    Hey, Howard Dean just gave up being head of the DNC. I can only imagine that means he’s planning on running for office again. Maybe the Senate soon? Does Dean need a PR guru? YEARRRGH! He sure does! What do you think of Vermont? I here there’s nice moonlight there.

  4. pennie
    January 10, 2009 - 2:20 pm

    Sorry, must have been dreaming about Rosie the Riveter. Duh, it’s Ruby and the Romantics. I hate it when that happens…}’;>)

  5. Martha Thomases
    January 10, 2009 - 3:14 pm

    @Russ — Vermont is probably very nice. All I know about it is what my friends who there on communces 30 years ago.

  6. Rachel Kadushin
    January 10, 2009 - 9:03 pm

    Keep reinventing yourself. I can’t answer what to do about health insurance in the meanwhile, but don’t be surprised if you find more project work than perm.

  7. Kai
    January 11, 2009 - 12:25 pm

    your resume shows your kick ass experience!

  8. Pat Gaik
    January 11, 2009 - 3:35 pm

    Any organization would be lucky to have you! Here’s a tip: Go into an interview with your knitting, and while you’re talking, whip out a quick pair of socks to present to your interviewer when you’re done! Then promise that “there’s more where those came from!”

  9. Better Dead Than Red
    January 12, 2009 - 12:50 pm

    Martha Wrote…”We need our roads and bridges rebuilt”

    I am sorry, to completely disagree with you on this, but, I must. Obama is already on the wrong path with this “plan” of his (which, btw still has no pricetag). The model for what he wants to do, has already been attempted and proved to be a waste.

    For a recent reference I have http://mises.org/story/1099 linked here. Just read and absorb what Japan attempted to do, when they collapsed in the mid-to late 80’s (and pay special attention to the sections on Keynesian Theory). They used almost this exact blueprint, and wasted everyone’s money, work, and time.

    I want better for this country, and I pray that President Elect Obama, wakes up, and fast, before he spirals our country into even more dire straits.

  10. John Tebbel
    January 12, 2009 - 1:44 pm

    Fascinating link. Would take plenty guts to apply laissez faire approach that “has not been tried” in a world with a twenty-four hour news cycle and pictures of Hoovervilles a click away.

    Back to roads and bridges, I would suggest an intelligent government plan an intelligent system, like the Interstate Highways when they were ahead of capacity. Not sure what that might be. Probably a mix of different solutions. Something fuzzy.

  11. Martha Thomases
    January 12, 2009 - 1:55 pm

    @ Better Dead Than Red: I’m not an economist, nor do Ii play one on TV. However, your cited source mentions Paul Krugman to support his argument. In today’s New York Times, Krugman says something quite different (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/opinion/12krugman.html?_r=1&ref=opinion).

    More to the point, I think, is the success of the New Deal in this country. I know that many conservatives don’t like it (not to put words in your mouth), but I think most Americans were glad to have it.

  12. Better Dead Than Red
    January 12, 2009 - 2:56 pm

    Martha Wrote…”More to the point, I think, is the success of the New Deal in this country. I know that many conservatives don’t like it (not to put words in your mouth), but I think most Americans were glad to have it.”

    Americans were glad to have anything in that period of time. ‘ol FDR’s New Deal wound up costing us more in years and money than a more simple capitalist approach, as for some more fun with links… http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx?RelNum=5409 is a good one regarding Roosevelt.

    Without that “New Deal” we would not have the massive bleeding cyst, that is Social Security and other unnecessary social “experiments” that were/are a constant drain on our economy. As for a final word on Social Security…it was to be a “temporary” fix for the problems of the depression, and was never intended to be the end “solution” it has become…Which is a crutch and burden on this and future generations.

  13. Martha Thomases
    January 12, 2009 - 7:32 pm

    @Better Dead Than Read: I don’t know. I live in Manhattan and own my apartment. It’s not only a quality of life issue for me that I not step over freezing and starving homeless old people — I also think their absence protects my property values.

    A laissez-faire attitude allowed corporations (and sometimes unions) to rape and pillage people’s pension funds. It seems to me that Social Security is especially needed if we are going to trust market forces.

  14. Alan Coil
    January 12, 2009 - 9:39 pm

    The market is self-correcting. The problem is that it is self-correcting AFTER it fails. It doesn’t correct itself during the crisis period, but after many people have lost their money. Laissez-faire leads to more situations like Madoff.

  15. R. Maheras
    January 13, 2009 - 7:48 am

    Best of luck with the employment search. I’m in PR as well, but I have no magic bullets to offer about getting hired, except the usual common sense stuff.

    Since retiring from the military in 1998, I’ve been job-hunting four times — three times because I had to. My military retirement is modest, so it’s not like my wife and I can live off of it unless, as I often joke using Chris Farley’s famous quote, “we live in a van down by the river.”

    One particular time I had to look for work was just a few weeks after 9/11 — a time when no one seemed to be hiring, or even advertising positions. In the space of a couple of weeks, the “Chicago Tribune” want ads went from three thick sections of the newspaper to a mere four to eight pages – most of which were medical or commissioned sales positions. I was let go, along with lots of other folks, when my company was bought by a bigger company. I didn’t think I’d ever find work, but finally lucked into something a little more than three months later.

    This job market, however, is obviously different than the post-9/11 job market. It seems to be deeper, and more long-term than the latter, which was due primarily to collective, country-wide, post-traumatic shock. In 2001, the global economy was still roaring, which helped yank the U.S. out of its terrorist-spawned funk. There is no such external stimulus now.

    Again, best of luck with the job search!

  16. Dwight Williams
    January 13, 2009 - 8:54 am

    Despite the would-be laissez-faire inflictors currently holding seats in my home country’s House of Commons, I still believe in the value of a decent infrastructure and safety net myself. If it weren’t for these things, Canada wouldn’t have a hope of being a nation fit to live in for as many of us as it is even now.

    And we STILL have people falling through the holes in that safety net who shouldn’t be doing so. Not planning on giving up on making it a better system, though.

    You shouldn’t either.

Comments are closed.