MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Yackety Yak, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise

August 15, 2009 Martha Thomases 13 Comments

The news this week – print, Internet, broadcast and cable – has been obsessed with the town hall meetings that members of Congress hold with their constituents during the summer break.  The topic this year is most frequently health care, specifically the Obama plan for reform, and it’s a subject of real interest to many in our country.

As with so many issues, this interest extends beyond the individual citizen (with or without health insurance) to many groups who feel they have a stake in the campaign.  I understand this.  I understand why unions, small business owners, insurance companies, health care professionals, and the pharmaceutical industry want to contribute to the national conversation.  Even when I don’t agree with their points of view, or their conclusions about the facts as they see them, I agree with their right (in fact, insist upon) to make their voices heard.

I have less sympathy with those who use their highly paid skills as lobbyists and marketers to masquerade as a grassroots movement.  Free speech means they have the right to mislead us, but there is no honor in it, and they deserve to be humiliated when they are caught.

As Mark Twain once said, “As an active privilege, it (freedom of speech) ranks with the privilege of committing murder; we may exercise it if we are willing to take the consequences.”

The First Amendment is one of my favorites, right up there with freeing the slaves and giving women the vote.  It says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”  

You’ll note that people have the right to assemble “peaceably.”  This becomes especially important when we consider the Second Amendment:  “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

As a pacifist, I’m not a big fan of the Second Amendment, but I acknowledge that it’s an important element of the law of the land.  However, I think that the Founders, when they were drafting the Constitution and, then, the Bill of Rights, knew how they felt about guns (they liked them!) and knew what they were doing when they used the word, “peaceably” in the First Amendment.

I’ve been part of a lot of demonstrations.  I’ve been on a lot of marches.  I’ve had fun chanting (really, try it:  1,2,3,4/We don’t want your fucking war!) and I’ve felt creepy chanting (my friend, Howard Cruse, said it made him feel like he was in Animal Farm, where they changed, “Four legs good/Two legs better.”).  I’ve booed speakers, hissed at speakers, and walked out on speakers.  Mostly, I hate speeches at demonstrations because they are rarely any good, and my feet hurt when I stand a lot.

But I’ve never shouted anyone down.  I’ve never seized a microphone.  I’ve never prevented another person from speaking.

I don’t think the Founders were in favor of that.

I also don’t think they’d be in favor of people bringing weapons to these town hall meetings.  Perhaps, because the country was more rural and more dangerous in the Eighteenth Century, they would have understood bringing a gun, just in case there were wolves in the woods, but I have to believe they’d have some kind of coat-check situation for their guns once the meetings started.

If, like me, you’re disgusted by our level of discourse, do something about it.  When someone presents a lie as a fact, object.  When someone uses a vague antecedent (e.g. “Some Democrats/Republicans have said that _____”), ask who it was.  Remember, there’s a big difference between a statement from someone with a blog on the Internet, someone with a job in the media and an elected official.  All are citizens, but one represents the Government, one is probably making a lot of money, and one is a person with a blog.

Remember, freedom of speech works best if you study first.

Media Goddess Martha Thomases probably can’t be on a Death Panel because of the pacifism thing, but just in case, she’s making a list.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. John Tebbel
    August 15, 2009 - 6:00 am

    There’s so much money at stake here, and money can buy so much speech and so many guns, that the cause of naked, un-monetized truth is the little match girl of today’s American democracy.

    On the other hand, noted swine Dick Armey, exterminator, lawmaker, lobbyist, is temporarily without stool as his big Pharma clients switched sides faster than he could. Once a stranger coming into your home to put dangerous poisons near your children and pets . . .

  2. Howard Cruse
    August 15, 2009 - 7:30 am

    I’m glad you’re still on this topic, Martha, because I wanted to leave a comment last week and I was just too steamed to put any words together. The fact that the U.S. can’t get it together to have a single-payer National Health System really pushes my buttons, and the fact that even Obama’s reasonably intelligent if admittedly disappointing public-option half-measure may be successfully swift-boated into oblivion by rich corporate interests is driving me crazy.

    Aside from the comics folks you mentioned last week who are in need of financial help due to the kind of medical catastrophes that can befall any of us, the underground comix pioneer S. Clay Wilson is in dire straits. Like many others in the comics field, I have received requests for donations to contribute money and to offer artwork for benefit auctions in his behalf (as I have for John Ostrander). Problem is, I can’t afford to contribute much money and my original art, for whatever reason, doesn’t attract substantial enough bids at auction to be of much benefit to anyone.

    And what’s infuriating is that NONE of us should need to be called on to help individually in situations like this because it should be a given that ill or injured people will be cared for by whatever doctors are needed with the cost being paid by the government. And if the pool of insured persons were EVERYBODY in the U.S., sick or healthy, and if we could abandon our present system of paying exorbitant insurance premiums to profit-making private insurers and instead use that premium money to pay the taxes required for a single insurer that ISN’T trying to line its pockets with profits, then Ostrander and Wilson and any of us could simply get treated by our doctors of choice when we need to without being billed into bankruptcyfor a particular procedure.

    Sorry for the soapbox talk. I know that my preferred system hasn’t got a chance in hell of being enacted in the U.S. anytime soon, but it really steams me that slick television campaigns of lies and mob-produced chaos in town meetings may defeat even the mild improvement proposed by Obama, keep the status quo in place, and leave me continuing to feel helpless when, as one non-affluent individual, I’m unable to do much to help people who deserve help and who shouldn’t have to turn to me or any other individuals to get it.

  3. linda gold
    August 15, 2009 - 8:45 am

    Howard, thanks for articulating all the things that have been stewing in my head and guts this week. I am ashamed of my country. It seems to me the people who are screaming loudest about this are the very ones who already benefit from government healthcare. You know the brilliant “keep the government out of my Medicare” folks. Sometimes I despair for us all. I also wonder when we became a country of “I’ve got mine, screw my neighbor”. And yet I bet these people sit down each year to watch “It’s a Wonderful Life” and get all misty eyed at the end never realizing that in real life they’d be saying “Well George, you’ve made some bad decisions so don’t come looking for help from me. I take care of myself and my family and you should do the same. Guess you’ll just have to go to jail due to your poor planning”
    When did America turn into Pottersville?

  4. Martha Thomases
    August 15, 2009 - 9:10 am

    Actually, I think IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE is one of those films that everyone thinks agrees with their politics. I suspect that conservatives think it shows how people will band together to help each other, without government interference.

    Similarly, I think POLLYANNA can be used the same way (although not as much fun).

  5. pennie
    August 15, 2009 - 11:35 am

    Martha, you (and your faithful reader/posters) just make so much sense. My shame and outrage is overshadowed by so much rampant hypocrisy masquerading as protest.
    In my salad days, it never made sense to me that the quality of one’s health was directly proportionate to one’s financial–not artistic portfolio. It still makes no sense.

    So one gets to live longer, survive dread infections and get high quality medicine and prolonged care if one can pay for it. Not so much for the rest of us.

    If Obama’s election slogan and political objective has represented change, all of this anti-heath-care-hoo-ha,the birthers, those against Sotomayor and all those votes and howls against ANYTHING in Obama’s agenda are nothing more or less than a bitter reaction against change–all change. That a good-sized majority of the voters supported change less than a year ago would lead one to think there was clear support.
    It’s just so disheartening to see these shout-downs of a system most would agree is broke and requires fixing. When a plausible alternative is offered, instead, the fix come in under the guide of healthy dialogue. Hard to have a dialogue when when one side dominates with screams and little else in the way of articulated and reasonable discourse.

  6. linda gold
    August 15, 2009 - 2:35 pm

    I might agree Martha except the conservatives I have been hearing don’t want to help out people without goevernment interfrenece, they just don’t want to help people out at all. “Stand on your own two feet and get a job you lazy bum.”

  7. linda gold
    August 15, 2009 - 2:37 pm

    Pennie,
    someone last night (I think it was Jon Stewart) said it’s really hard to have a dialouge when your side offers up a proposal and the other side says “I like turtles”.

  8. Mike Gold
    August 15, 2009 - 3:19 pm

    “The Founders” sounds like a rock group, albeit a really old one.

    Sometimes the politically correct thing is not only inferentially revisionist, but outright silly. At the time of its founding, our nation did not permit women to vote or to own property (which means, back then, they couldn’t vote), to serve on juries, sign contracts, or join the armed forces. Yep, and the White House was built by slaves. Deal with it. It’s our history. We’ve improved on that somewhat, but let’s not change history by implication. What was, was. Let’s explain why that was bad before the next overprotected generation loses sight of the struggle.

  9. pennie
    August 15, 2009 - 3:21 pm

    Linda,
    You made me smile and laugh–good medicine!

  10. pennie
    August 15, 2009 - 4:35 pm

    Mike,
    Founding Mothers? Not even referential to earliest Zappa.
    Never heard that term for the reasons you cited–there weren’t any.
    Purposeful exclusion.

    If those guys who convened to give our country a healthy kick start had seen fit to include us, THAT would have entered the realm of truly remarkable, unprecedented in modern political and social Western historical scope and just plain cosmic.

    Thankfully, as a country we have expanded the original boundaries to include many who were not permitted to participate back in that day. You’re so right–we just need to keep moving on but not let fantasy, ignorance or revisionism to supplant the past.

  11. Mike Gold
    August 16, 2009 - 7:08 am

    You know, Pennie, it’s been a couple decades since some of the original Mothers regrouped as the Grandmothers.

    I’m still trying to figure out why the term “motherfucker” is an insult. Must have been coined by people of limited range, I suppose.

  12. pennie
    August 16, 2009 - 11:54 am

    That first MOI album was released at a particularly auspicious time in my life–along with Blonde on Blonde it rarely strayed far from the turntable. Zappa’s original collective could roar. The summer of 1968 (I think it was but could be off–go figure)they cooked every night in a club in the Village. I was there a lot for the nightly festivities Frank accessorized with dolls. vibrators, and other assorted on-stage paraphernalia. That the original Little Feat–among others–sprang from this melange was no surprise. “Who are the Brain Police” and “Call Any Vegetable,” indeed!

    Martha always had a good take on some of the more popular inflammatory curses. She can relate that part.
    From Celtic and Germanic origins forward to the MC5 among others, that small term of endearment certainly raises the ante in most situations. Not sure why as at some point, with so many of us having borne children, many of us have eagerly participated in the role and consummation.

  13. Mike Gold
    August 16, 2009 - 6:45 pm

    Dylan, Zappa, George, MC5… sounds like you’ve been tapping into my Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind playlists, Pennie. My respect for Wayne Kramer has grown enormously in the past decade or so; MC5 was a seminal group and it’s nice to see Wayne’s still at it.

Comments are closed.