Heartache by Numbers, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise
December 11, 2010 Martha Thomases 12 Comments
Is our children learning? Not enough. According to a recent news story, the United States continues to do a rotten job of education our children. We can argue about who to blame (teachers? parents? violdent video games?), but there is most likely no single cause, but rather a combination of factors.
We don’t like problems without simple answers. We avoid them. And maybe that’s why this problem won’t go away.
Over the weekend, I talked with an old friend, a retired New York city detective. He told me about a job he’d been given to research ways to improve security at the Newark public elementary schools. He said the kids there test way above average until fourth grade, when their scores plummet.
This, he told me, is typical of inner-city schools around the country. “Peer pressure” was his diagnosis.
If I understood him correctly, he was saying that, once kids hit the age of 10 or so, it isn’t cool to be smart. There is very little in this life more annoying than someone’s mom telling you that learning is cool, but, if we’re going to survive as a nation, somebody has to do it.
When I was that age, and nobody could tell me anything, I thought the coolest thing to be was a poet (preferably a tragic poet) or a beatnick, like Carolyn Jones in A Hole in the Head. After that, I wanted to be a crusading lawyer. As I got a bit older, I wanted to be funny and incisive like Dorothy Parker or Nora Ephron. To do these things, I needed to read – a lot – and that was fine, because I liked reading.
In other words, whatever glamor was attached to any of the adult lives to which I aspired, at the core was something that gave me pleasure. I got some immediate gratification to go with my ambitions.
Reading was not the only thing I enjoyed. I really liked math. I loved the feeling I got when, suddenly, a complicated theorem made sense and I could do the proof. I used to do quadratic equations for the buzz. I liked science, too, but was less good at it. I’m not great at memorization, and could not retain the periodic tables no matter how hard I tried. Still, the parts that were like math were big fun.
In college, I took a course in Chinese Literature in Translation, and got goosebumps listening to the professor read poems in the original Mandarin. Didn’t understand a word of it, but the rhythms were amazing.
We need school to show kids how learning can get them high. We need to encourage teachers to offer the first hits for free, so kids will beg to come back for more.
Teachers can’t do this on their own. We need the whole country to join in.
Ten years ago, I had a client who produced a line of dolls that were designed to inspire girls. Unlike Barbie, they were reasonably proportioned and could actually stand on their own feet. Each came with enough accessories so that girls could play at real professions, with instructions on how to make more, and back-story on real women who were successful in those fields. We even ran one for president.
Learning history and economics was fun.
Recently, Stephen Colbert showed how much fun contemporary art can be. In a segment on his show this week , he demonstrated several themes important to understanding the past 50 years of art history in a way that was insightful, complex – and hilarious.
We, as a nation, will have to agree that our children our worthy of our time and resources. We’d have to acknowledge that children – even other people’s children – have an effect on our lives and it is in our best interests to help them. We might have to think of them as people, and not just a market.
We might have to encourage them to have fun.
Media Goddess Martha Thomases is grateful for this week of no gift-giving holidays.
MOTU
December 11, 2010 - 1:52 pm
Wow, you and Whitney must have been smoking the same joint!
Mike Gold
December 11, 2010 - 2:06 pm
Martha, you’re funnier than Nora Ephron and smarter than Dorothy Parker.
Peer group pressure is not an inevitable force in real life. It’s just another excuse for bad parenting or, worse, lazy parenting. Yeah, yeah, kids just want to fit in, be part of the pack, be cool. Absolutely. But their value are defined by their parents — stress individualism and personal achievement for the sake of achievement and kick ’em in the ass to get them moving and away from focusing all their attention on one or two things, be they video games, computers, cell phones, the guitar, sex and fashion (which I link together, and parents — good luck with that) or whathaveyou. And maybe they’ll learn not to write run-on sentences.
Do not surrender your child to the church, the school, the wolf pack, video games, computers, cell phones, the guitar, and/or sex and fashion; they are YOUR responsibility and they were since the moment daddy came. Pay attention to your kids and treat them with respect like they are human beings that are adults-in-training and encourage them in what they want to do with their lives and you won’t have problems in school. If you actually allow them to fail when they try and suffer some of life’s pains, you won’t have self-esteem problems. Stop medicating them for every little thing.
Very few kids wind up in the metaphorical ditch and those that do are usually there because of the actions of family members. Worse case scenario, they’ll drop out of school and start cooking meth and have more job security than their parents ever dreamed of.
Reg
December 11, 2010 - 3:14 pm
Synchronicity!!!
Too cool.
Howard Cruse
December 11, 2010 - 3:24 pm
My brother was part of an experiment in teaching algebra to third graders. Solving simultaneous equations was presented as a game, with competing teams each given an equation and the winning team being the one that could figure out which point on a big graph would satisfy the requirements of both teams’ equations. The kids loved it.
Sometime around fifth grade kids begin learning from someone (their peers? nearby grownups?) that math is hard and no fun. Before that, with creative teaching they can roll right along.
pennie
December 11, 2010 - 3:50 pm
I agree with Mike: Martha you are funnier than Nora Ephron and smarter than Dorothy Parker.
Make learning important and relevant–it can be fun as you illustrated. Hell, I struggled with math until I learned how important it was to understanding odds and counting cards. Then–I embraced it and have since. Combined poetry, strategic thinking, philosophy and math…what’s not to love?
Whitney
December 12, 2010 - 7:34 am
Amazing Martha –
Negative B plus or minus radical B squared minus 4 A C all over 2 A.
Yep. It’s offical. We’re twins.
John Tebbel
December 13, 2010 - 6:31 am
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/guest-bloggers/what-international-test-scores.html?hpid=sec-education
Marc Alan Fishman
December 13, 2010 - 7:37 am
I grew up in a very well-to-do middle class suburb, where my parents specifically decided to live strongly based on the school system. I attended blue ribbon winning public schools throughout my entire childhood into high school. I took advanced classes and honors courses… was considered “gifted” in elementary school… and graduated 67th in a class of 700+ kids. 66 of those kids ahead of me are probly all now off curing cancer and flying rockets to the moon.
In my life, short lived as it’s been thus far, being smart wasn’t ever considered cool or uncool. You just “were” or “are”… or you’re not. I agree though, totally with the points Martha and Mike have made: It’s a combination of environment, parents, etc. that help mold a child. “It Takes A Village” is the truth in my mind. And when your village has a liquor store on the corner, sells drugs in the alleyways, and your own parents are too busy to instill in their kids the desire to embrace education… we end up with a generation of dullards, to busy with everything else to care about being smart.
I know soon I’ll be thinking about bringing a child into this world… but mark my words: In my house, smarts counts.
Martha Thomases
December 13, 2010 - 8:14 am
I agree that peer pressure is a lazy excuse for bad behavior. However, it seems to work. For example, in my lifetime, blowjobs have gone from something only sluts (i.e. not “good girls”) do to something girls everywhere do, to the extent that it’s a plot point on LAW & ORDER: SVU. And, most shockingly, there seems to be no requirement for reciprocity.
And yet, thanks to science and history, we know the distinction between sluts and good girls is bullshit, that reciprocity is a great idea, and you don’t have to risk pregnancy to have a good time.
If we value our kids and value their lives, we will offer them a whole menu of pleasurable activities, from sports to arts to science and math. And, along the way, we’ll instill in them the awareness that having a body is fun. And knowing things makes it more fun.
Marc Alan Fishman
December 13, 2010 - 9:49 am
I think I’m reading this wrong Martha… Are you implying I should get a hummer next time I watch Mythbusters?
Martha Thomases
December 13, 2010 - 9:53 am
@Marc: It wouldn’t hurt.
Shane Kelly
December 13, 2010 - 1:25 pm
Marc Wrote: “I think I’m reading this wrong Martha… Are you implying I should get a hummer next time I watch Mythbusters?”
to which, Martha wrote: “@Marc: It wouldn’t hurt.”
Not so fast there..that would depend on whether or not there are teeth involved and utilized properly.
🙂