American Doll, by Russ Rogers – Musings On a Song #1
January 6, 2011 Russ Rogers 0 Comments
The Repeal of the Military Policy, “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” just passed. Hooray! It was more than I thought this last lame duck Congress could get done. The policy that forced members of our armed services to lie and hide who they are was outdated even before it was implemented 17 years ago. It’s about time our Military began operating on a more honest and rational level.
For social conservatives the question of “Where are the Gays going to shower?” seems very important. OK. I understand. The thought of homosexuality makes some uneasy, a little squeamish even. It’s an attraction that they don’t understand, so it has to be wrong. Get over it. As Barney Frank told a conservative reporter from CNS News, “To accept the principle that homosexuals can’t shower with other people is a degree of discrimination that goes far beyond [‘don’t ask, don’t tell’]. We don’t get ourselves dry cleaned.”
“American Doll” written and recorded by Jason Morris. Jason Morris was the runner up in the Masters of Song Fu 2 Songwriting Contest. He spends time locked away in his studio, writing and recording songs. It doesn’t pay the bills, but he has a good time doing it. You can download Jason’s song, “American Doll,” and pay what you want!
“American Doll,” by Jason Morris is a great song. It’s sweaty, gritty, nasty ROCK and ROLL! It’s also about a fascination with a Love Doll. And that’s a sexual attraction that I just don’t understand.
I don’t think that Love Dolls are even particularly healthy things. It literally objectifies women. (Or men, I guess there are also male sex dolls.) It’s takes the idea of a “sex toy” to what is an uncomfortable anthropomorphic extreme. Beyond that, for me the thought of a Silicone Love Doll is just oogy. It makes me feel all squeamish inside.
Now, I haven’t seen the movie, “Lars and the Real Girl,” (2007) starring Ryan Gosling. But it got good reviews and I would like to. It’s not a porn movie. It’s a heart-warming, character-study of a social invalid who finds an odd way of coming out of his shell.
OK, I get it. A life-sized Love Doll offers unconditional pseudo-companionship, with no questions and no reservations. I can understand the appeal … in theory. But, like many modern conveniences, I can see how these things might be used as a substitute for real relationships. And that’s sad. That said, I have more respect for someone who treats their Love Doll like a Real Woman, than the guy who treats their Girlfriend or Wife like a Love Doll.
Now, Rule #34 states that whatever can be imagined, there is porn of it. And I’m not such a moral relativist as to say, “Whatever turns you on is OK by me.” Some things some people find sexy are just icky to me. But life is too short to try to legislate against everything that makes us squeamish. So, if you’re not hurting anybody, I won’t ask. And seriously, you don’t have to tell.
Russ Rogers is a songwriter, comedian and children’s entertainer. He has a Childrens Show called Rusty’s Rocking Jamboree and has recently recorded an albums worth of more grown up songs in the duo Godz Poodlz. “Musing on a Song” will feature a different Creative Commons Copyright song each week. Hopefully this will introduce you to songs and artists with which you’ve been completely unfamiliar. I might take the time to talk directly about the song or the artist. Maybe even do an interview. But sometimes the song will just be a jumping off point or another way to illustrate the column. So, if you know of some Creative Commons Artist that deserves more attention, let me know in the comments. One more thing, I’m not in love with the title, “Musing on a Song.” If you’e got suggestions for a better title, please leave them in the comments.
Mike Gold
January 6, 2011 - 8:24 pm
Cool. Glad you joined us on starting gate side. I really look forward to reading your stuff… and probably engaging in a music debate or two! You’re spreading the word on the new talent front and doing it without the bastards who run the labels. Good for you!
MOTU
January 6, 2011 - 8:53 pm
Welcome Russ! Nice job! Here’s my suggestion for a title:
Mr. Rogers Neighborhood.
Get it!?
No?
Whitney
January 6, 2011 - 9:00 pm
Welcome, Russ!
Variations on a Theme…with props to Don Levine and the GI Joe circle:
When I’m in a snotty mood, my smart-ass comeback is, “No. I’m not a doll. I’m an action figure.”
McCarthy
January 6, 2011 - 9:19 pm
Russ, I think our beloved MOTU can add a little insight into the love of dolls.
It reminds me of the old joke where the little girl asks a shopping mall Santa Claus for a Barbie and a G.I. Joe. Confused, Santa asks the little girl “Doesn’t Barbie come with Ken?”
And the little girl tells Santa that, no, Barbie comes with G.I. Joe . . . she only fakes it with Ken.
Marc Fishman
January 6, 2011 - 10:03 pm
Russ! Glad to see your ramblings, musings, and whatnot here on MDW. Of course I should note my sincere jealousy, given how often I comment here. Apparently I’m not cool enough yet. So in the mean time, I’ll continue to read and comment on articles here on MDW. Kudos on article no. 1. My thoughts: I like the genuine rocky-ness of the track. It’s akin to a Jonathan Coulton, maybe 10-20% less nerdy. I like the vocals here most of all. The guitar and bass work is solid and keeps things driving. The drums don’t sound live. It could be the mixing of it though. Lyrically… I’m not sure I’m “there” as a fan to it. It’s not quite satirical or funny like a Coulton or TMBG track… nor is it all that melodramatic or tongue in cheek like a barenaked lady track either. A bit too much in the middle. But overall? There’s a real talent here that I think would benefit with more live players. I dig it.
Looking forward to your next find Russ. In the mean time, I’m gonna go cry in a corner and wonder why MOTU is keeping me out of the compound.
Tom Giarrosso
January 6, 2011 - 10:30 pm
Russ –
Nice job on your first stab at this reviewing thing. I’d like to see more of Jason’s stuff out there.
his song ‘All I Know’ still is one of the best ‘happy stalker’ songs I’ve heard. The video is worth a look as well. How many ways can you visualize ‘to’ and ‘be’? A lot more than I could some up with.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EBjyb4iuQk
MOTU
January 6, 2011 - 11:17 pm
Marc,
What do you have in mind? Really.
Whitney
January 7, 2011 - 1:59 am
@ McCarthy…
We just finished our show at the club with Drivin’ N Cryin’, and I told them your joke so they can take it on the road!
McCarthy
January 7, 2011 - 2:20 am
I hope it cheers them up.
Martha Thomases
January 7, 2011 - 5:53 am
Welcome!
As someone with a New York apartment (and therefore not enough storage space), I’m not going to get a Love Doll. But, since I have other equipment that hides more easily, I’m also not going to pretend I don’t get it.
Russ Rogers
January 7, 2011 - 8:03 am
@Mike,thanks for the welcome. I’m looking forward to hearing what you think of the music and my columns. I’m excited about featuring lesser known artists, but not all artists using Creative Commons Licensing are unknown or without a label. They’ll be time to explore in the coming weeks.
@MOTU, I’m very excited about having a column here. I actually considered that title, many times. Fred Rogers and I aren’t related. But my mother once had dinner with his mother. Seriously. My mothers uncle was Fred’s neighbor and minister as a kid. Her cousins went to school with him. In all seriousness, I’m a HUGE Mr. Rogers fan!
@Whitney, thanks for the welcome. That’s a brilliant comeback line. I’m just sorry I won’t get more opportunities to use it.
@McCarthy. Funny joke. I will probably repeat it without giving you any attribution. Just warning you.
@Marc, I’m as surprised and jealous of me as you are! It’s how I’ve felt about your streams of brilliant articles over at ComicMix.com. Seriously, I don’t think I’d be here (I don’t think I would have asked the MOTU for a column) without your inspiration.
@Tom Giarrosso, I agree. Jason is a great writer. He ought to have more of his stuff available at bandcamp. I hope this article can generate some interest, downloads and even sales for Jason, and encourage him to do that. There will probably several other artists that get featured before I get back around to Jason Morris again. “All I Know” is a delicious song. It deserves hundreds of thousands on views on YouTube, not just hundreds. http://www.youtube.com/user/JasonMorrisMusic
@Martha, Thanks! I have nothing against toys of most any kind. But, you know people who call there dogs and cats their “babies”? How that’s cute, but it’s also kind of awkward and strange for anybody outside of their immediate family. Then there are the people who name their stuffed animals, “This is Mr. Bumpkins,” and have to have them arranged just so. Love Dolls just take that kind of anthropomorphism on into a fetish level that makes me go, “Really?” My point (if I have one) is that just because it’s something I don’t understand, and makes me a bit uncomfortable, that doesn’t automatically elevate it to something that deserves legislative attention. I’m prejudiced. I get that. I’ll just have to live with myself and get over it.
JoAnn in VA
January 7, 2011 - 8:48 am
I know I have this song from when I was listening to all the song fu stuff, but didn’t really notice it until now. I ought to go through and give everything from the fu’s another listen and decide what to keep and toss. Meanwhile, hubby leaned over while I was listening and asked where this was from, he said it sounded really professional, and I agreed. I also had fun explaining to him that the challenge was to write about an inanimate object…and watch his face change as he realized what I (and the song) was saying. heh heh heh.
As to the opening political commentary- I thought this was mostly a music blog? Here is my take on that subject.
I used to go to a womans only health club called Spa Lady. This is because if I am going to get all hot and sweatly and funky while wearing exercise gear that reveals every bump I am trying to get rid of, I would prefer to do it in the company of only other sweaty pitiful looking women, thank you. I did NOT want to join a co-ed gym, I just wanted to try and get some shape back after have kids. And yes, I know that “round” is a shape. Things went well until this guy decided to sue Spa Lady for discrimation against men, and they were forced to let him join and work out with us. I let my membership run out. Spa Lady went backrupt in 3 more years. No, he wasn’t allowed in the locker room with us, but I didn’t feel comfortable having him there; this had been my area of exercise and relaxation, and his presence changed that. I would no more want to share a shower with him than many straight men want to share a shower with someone who might be homosexual. If you are into exhibition and like being ogled, and all participants are in agreement-go for it. No one, however, should be forced to participate in another’s sexuality in such an intimate manner. In the US military you can’t just opt out of group shower settings, especially in the field/combat situations. I would be akin to forceing the male and female troops to shower in the same open tent at the same time. Unless your life is in danger and you need to do a mass decontamination effort of an exposed unit, this would not be fair to the majority of the female soldiers, and probably not to a lot of the males as well.
How many years did you serve in the military, by the way? I wore that dang ugly outfit for 15 years. Should have gone Air Force- I always look better in blue. OD green is NOT my color.
Marc Alan Fishman
January 7, 2011 - 9:04 am
@MOTU, no need to bathe Russ’s board with my pitches. I’ll e-mail you this weekend.
Russ Rogers
January 7, 2011 - 12:17 pm
@JoAnn, I’m not in favor of uni-sex bathrooms. And I can understand if some people are squeamish about showering with someone who is homosexual. But eliminating “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” will actually make it easier for service members who are squeamish to avoid that situation. Because service members are already showering with gay people, they just might not know it. Squeamish Service Members will have opportunitiese to say, “Oh, I guess I can wait ten minutes to shower.”
But as a matter of National Security, I don’t think it’s right that the Armed Forces lose talented, trained, patriotic service members just because some people can’t get past their own squeamishness.
I don’t think it’s fair that some guy sued Spa Lady to get a membership. But my guess is that you have showered with many gay women in your lifetime, probably even several at Spa Lady. And because you were not aware of it, they were probably very discreet with their ogling.
Seriously, gay people have a lot more on their minds when they shower than “Who am I going to get a peek at this time!” Things like, “Does my shampoo really smell that THAT?” and “I wonder what’s for dinner?” And any gay guys who have peeked at me, well, they really didn’t get to see very much.
JoAnn, I respect and honor your 15 years of service. I haven’t worn a uniform to protect and serve since being a 6th Grade Crossing Guard. But just because I haven’t been in the military, I don’t think that devalues my opinion, even on issues like Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.
Riker
January 7, 2011 - 1:16 pm
Bravo, Russ!
When I first saw the link to this article I was expecting more of an analysis of the song and nothing else… you know, like all song review articles generally trend. Upon reading it, however, I was pleasantly surprised to discover that this was, in fact, ‘musing on a song’; you let the song stand as a jumping-off point from which your thoughts and ponderings took their own path.
This was a case of the article revealing as much about the author as it did about the song, but without disregarding or disrespecting it. That’s something I find to be very entertaining and refreshing.
I’ll be eagerly awaiting the next installment!
Stephan
January 7, 2011 - 1:49 pm
I agree with Riker out of whole heart. I like an article that introduces me to new music, and makes me think about more than just the song.
Where is the line between thing and person, when we start transferring feelings for people onto things? And then transfer those same feelings back onto people again?
Once we have affordable pleasure bots, all the issues you raise will be ratcheted up a notch. Of course, science fiction writers have been thinking about this for a long time…
Russ Rogers
January 7, 2011 - 3:53 pm
@Riker, I can’t promise that won’t occasionally write just an analysis of the song or just present an interview with the songwriter. But my hope is that my weekly column on MDW will be refreshingly different from other blogs about songs or songwriting. That’s my hope. Thanks for “getting it.”
@Stephan, I hadn’t even considered the Science-Fiction aspects of this. But yes, if we have Love Dolls now, can Love Bots be far behind? And your questions about the line between thing and person reminded me of a story:
Many years ago, my sister worked for “Self Help,” an organization that delivers social services to victims of Nazi persecution. She told me of a client who had cut out the mouth on a photograph of her brother, who had starved to death in the Nazi Death Camps. My sister’s client would feed the photo through the hole. It’s been decades since I thought of that story. And it still makes me weep. The question is, was the photograph a symptom of the old woman’s illness, or was it a therapy, a way for her to physically deal and manage with a trauma from decades before? Probably some of both.