MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Taking Care of Business, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise

January 8, 2011 Martha Thomases 10 Comments

With the new calendar year comes new terms in political office all around the country.  And, since the Republicans picked up more wins this round, many are talking about running the government ‘”like a business.”

What does this mean?

The purpose of a business is to create a product or service and sell it for a profit.  The purpose of a government is to provide for the welfare of its people, including a secure environment conducive to the running of businesses.  It’s possible that the skills necessary to do the former can adapt to the purposes of the latter, but it’s not a sure thing.

Want an example?  Let’s consider what happened in the Northeast last month,  There was a tremendous snowfall.  Combined with hurricane-level winds in excess of 60 miles an hour, and you have a mess under any circumstances.  In this case, add in the Christmas and New Year’s holidays, when many people like to take vacations with their families, and it’s a disaster.

Most people would agree, I think, that one function of a workable government in a situation like this is to make sure that the streets are cleared of snow.  This not only helps the community (kids can get to school, sick people can get to the hospital in an emergency), but also helps business, because workers can get to work and customers can buy products.  This is work that must be done.

However, in many cases, it wasn’t.

New York City tends to panic when it snows, and I think this is because we have relatively little, especially compared to the areas  immediately surrounding us.  The  warm currents from the ocean keep the city just enough warmer that most snow hits to the north and to the west.  The last few years have been especially mild.  If I were running a business, and looking for places to cut costs (and therefore increase profits), I’d want to slash my snow-removal budget.

And then, this would happen.

Our mayor, a successful businessman, also just decided that business expertise is among the skills needed for the school system.  Our new chancellor has no experience in education.  She managed large companies, sold ads, and made profits. Good things, but not the same as turning children into educated, employable adult  citizens.

At its worst, running  government like a business unites the worst aspects of both worlds.  The newly elected governor of Florida wants to guide his state in that direction, and his business seems to have been ripping off Medicare.

And, really, do you want your elected officials to act like this?  There was no way to turn a profit when cleaning up the Gulf.

It’s not my intention here to say that business is always bad and government is always good.  My father was a very successful real estate developer (who just told my son that he wasn’t very good at evaluating resumes because “we only hired relatives, which I’m willing to bet is a way that no one wants government to work).

And sometimes, the two work well together, much better than either would do alone.

Fewer slogans and more actual thinking would make this next election cycle a lot more enjoyable.  And the results would be a lot more effective.

Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, thanks everyone for their concern and good wishes for her father.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Mike Gold
    January 8, 2011 - 7:42 am

    Governments can’t hire relatives any longer, but voters regularly vote ’em in. All the time. Reference your new governor.

    I haven’t seen any positive relationship between having been a teacher and being a good administrator. What most school systems need right now is a person who knows how to reduce expenses to the maximum while reducing real education to the minimum, while working with the unions and the self-appointed community “representatives.” That sounds like the résumé of an administrator, not a teacher.

    I’m not certain NYC’s new chancellor has those qualifications. Were I living there, I’d prefer seeing a successful turn-around businessperson in that role. The concept of hiring a successful and intelligent administrator for an administrative position is not a bad one. The teachers’ union is afraid that a person with a business background is more experienced at resisting union demands and that a teach would be far more pro-teachers’ union. I’m not making a judgment here, just pointing out a reality.

  2. Howard Cruse
    January 8, 2011 - 8:05 am

    I think that considering an administrator’s professional history tells you something about values and their priorities. For a leader never to have devoted their adult energy to the mission of educating kids doesn’t make him or her a bad person, but it does make it unlikely that they’ve pondered with any depth the nature and possibilities of education as it applies children to be thoughtful, skeptical, and fully prepared citizens.

    Maybe someone who has concentrated only on business issues can hit the ground running and quickly modify the values and priorities they arrive with so that the complexities of molding and empowering new citizens take the lead. But I’m skeptical about that.

  3. Martha Thomases
    January 8, 2011 - 8:21 am

    The problem for Ms. Black, as I see it, is that the bottom line of a successful school system is an educated, productive population. This is a result that can’t be seen quarterly. Today’s businesses are judged by their results in terms of money, not quality of life. And while that can be appropriate for, say, Macy’s, it doesn’t work with kids.

  4. Mike Gold
    January 8, 2011 - 1:22 pm

    The fact that Ms. Black’s background is in the for-profit industries does not mitigate against her well appreciating the fact that the bottom line in her new job is, indeed, an educated productive population. I’ve been an executive with a Fortune 500 company — actually, a Fortune 82 company — and I get it.

    Having said that, no one, be it a teacher, a publisher, or a candlestick maker, can pull money out of her ass. She’s not going to get additional money from the city, not from the state, and certainly not from Congress, assuming there’s anybody left in Congress still alive. You need somebody who knows how to get the most out of a reduced budget.

    I fully expect this to be more-or-less irrelevant. The sanctimonious have emboldened the union and the teachers now feel there jobs are in jeopardy — as if their jobs and everybody else’s weren’t before.

    Extreme speech has its consequences, and in this case I fully expect the union to find cause to call a strike. Since there’s no money, if there’s a strike it could be a long one.

    Which might be a good thing. Last time the NYC teachers went out on a long strike, reading scores went up.

  5. pennie
    January 8, 2011 - 4:03 pm

    Martha, my take on this is just a tad warped by my chosen vocation and industry but I believe there are some viable analogies to be made.

    There was a time that (legal) casinos flourished because the owner/operators, i.e., mob guys, understood the inherent draw was gambling with a generous helping of sex and substance abuse. In the wake of Howard Hughes’ mid-1960’s monopolization of Vegas casinos that failed due to the federal government’s enforcement of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, curiously enough, Nevada relaxed it’s state Gaming Commission ordinances concerning corporate casino ownership with the result that multi-nationals replaced the various local mobs from NY, Chicago, KC and Detroit.
    Some would ask, what’s the diff?

    Here’s the rub. The old mob guys knew their margins and customers. The shows, restaurants, salon and spas–they were there as ancillary amenities.

    These new mobs tweaked everything into roaring profit centers. No part of a casino was permitted to go under budget. Spa offered as a comp? No mas. Now we get to charge even more than street prices because we can.

    The days of Benny Binion walking around the Horseshoe handing out hundred-dollar bills, “walkin’ money,” to those unfortunate souls who had gambled away their bus fares home–those days are long gone. Can you just see Steve Wynn dispensing Benjamins strolling around Wynn Resort (with the seeing eye dog leading)?
    Not so much.

    The old operators understood that the bottom line flowed from establishing human relationships–NOT milking every last drop. I think Mr. Gold could elaborate on the same sort of thing in Chicago politics. Same with Tammany Hall. Government and business worked differently back in the day. Not that they were entirely separate before–the “What’s good for GM is good for America,” thing…or even before with the railroad and oil barons.

    Now that they have combined forces in a different way we get what we pay for–a polarized, less efficient, more convoluted, less altruistic government that has strayed from its roots–the Tea Baggers notwithstanding.

  6. MOTU
    January 8, 2011 - 6:32 pm

    ” New York City tends to panic when it snows..”

    OH YOU HAVE NOT SEEN PANIC! In LA a light mist in the air is the lead story on every news station.

    STORM WACTH 2011.

    ‘Hi, I’m a frustrated actor reporting the news who had a choice between anchorman or porn. I chose anchorman because I have a small dick and did not want to follow mom into the family business. Today’s top story, MIST in the air! Here with more is a hot asian reporter who SHOULD be doing porn.

    ‘Hi, I’m a hot asian reporter who SHOULD be doing porn but I’d rather report the news because my dad owns a slew of Adult stores and he’s sure to give me crap during Christmas dinner. Our top story MIST in the air!”

    Cut to interviews with people on the street:

    Hot Asian reporter: SIR, what are you doing outside with mist the air?

    Person dressed like he’s going to the frozen tundra: I’m heading to Home Depot to get some 2 by 4’s. I suffered a great deal of damage during the Mist of 2009 but this time I’m going to be ready. I’m boarding up the windows and…

    Hot Asian reporter:Sorry sir, we have breaking news, back to the studio!

    Cut to the studio

    Anchorman: This just in, (Taking off glasses rubbing his eyes) the flash… apparently official, RAIN is falling in L.A. I don’t know how long we can stay on the air but we will try and…

    New York City tends to panic when it snows???

  7. Arthur Tebbel
    January 8, 2011 - 8:06 pm

    Oh my god! Is it going to rain? I only have four days worth of food.

    I don’t want it to end like this!

  8. MOTU
    January 9, 2011 - 2:31 am

    Art,

    I TOLD you to attend the ‘Rain Ready’ Seminars!

  9. Mike Gold
    January 9, 2011 - 8:54 am

    Art, MOTU — OK, I love snow. But I also enjoy the period before the snow gets heavy. When the weatherpeople (that’s a small W, Martha) are screaming apocalypse, I jump in the car and drive to the nearest, biggest supermarket I can find. I love watching really old ladies fight each other to the death over the last gallon of milk “for my baby.”

    Pennie, I don’t have the gamboling gene so everything I’ve learned comes from a historical perspective. I mean, each time I’ve been in a casino (maybe five times or so) I’ve walked away with enough profit for dinner for myself and my friends. That’s because I quit the minute I’ve earned enough profit for dinner for myself and my friends.

    So it is with no little amazement that I’ve learned that historically speaking gamboling was more important and more lucrative — and a lot more safe — than prostitution and substance sales combined. In fact, until prohibition prostitution and substance sales were more of ancillary services sold to encourage gamblers.

    And politics. The long-lasting political machines were forged by big gamboling entrepreneurs. In the 1880s a man named Mike McDonald ran a four story gamboling palace (and hotel) in downtown Chicago. Under attack by the local Republicans, McDonald used the political structure to take over the police departments and, ultimately, city hall and the county. He became as involved in “civic affairs” as much as he was in gamboling and prostitution. It wasn’t until the turn of the century, when Mike was getting old and transportation made the city the hub of the nation and loose money flowed freely, that the politicians and the “criminal element” decided to separate, with the former initially keeping their thumbs on the latter — a situation that reversed a decade or so later when the Republicans changed their attitude towards vice and took office, opening the city up wide. That lasted until the Democrats took back the mayor’s office in 1931 (there hasn’t been a Republican administration ever since… and there won’t be this year) and prohibition ended a couple years later. That drove the bars above-ground, the gamboling into the back-rooms, and prostitution onto the streets.

    All of which proves Nietzsche was correct.

  10. Ed
    January 12, 2011 - 3:31 pm

    It’s been snowing for 29 1/2 hours here in the Berkshires, still going strong, with 32 inches predicted. And yet I know that eventually I’ll see irises and crocuses and daylilies out the very same window through which I just watched Howard and Lulu frolic. Youse guys is crybabies.

Comments are closed.