The Best of Times, The Worst of Times, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #243
October 3, 2011 Mike Gold 6 Comments
It appears the Republicans – renamed the Tea Party – are in a jam. They are giving voters a field of candidates and then revealing them to be idiots in a series of nationally broadcast “debates” held approximately every couple days.
The TeaPubs have boxed themselves in. You’d think that with Obama’s approval rating dropping (granted, he’s still well above the bottoms reached by Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II), finding an electable candidate among those who identify with the party would be a no-brainer. But with each passing “debate,” the TeaPubs have shown themselves to be a rabble of fools out to devour their own young. They’ve managed to kick out or severely undermine the candidacies of every contender except Rick Perry and Mitt Romney, and now those two are in a duel to the death. Two TeaPubs enter, one leaves.
All the while, Barack Obama appears to have done the unlikely, if not impossible. Barack Obama appears to have grown a pair, just in the nick of time.
The TeaPubs won’t support Mitt. Old-time and now-devalued Republicans won’t support Perry. Neither looks good to the independents. But now the TeaPubs are doing something far worse for their party: they are destroying their own brand.
We see and hear the TeaPubs cheering a 30-year old man dying from lack of insurance. We see and hear even more TeaPubs cheering Rick Perry’s murder of 235 prison inmates (and counting). We see and hear the TeaPubs booing – actually booing – an American soldier on active duty in an Iraqi war zone, risking his life for their very freedom, solely because he is gay.
It’s not that these TeaPubs were ranting like drunken monsters at a WWE pay-per-view. That’s almost beside the point. Their problem is, not a single one of these pandering postulant pinheads running for the TeaPub crown stood up at those debates to say this is wrong. To say that supporting preventable death is wrong. To say that killing 235 prisoners – that’s almost two deaths each and every month since Perry took office – is not justice, it’s simply bloodthirsty vengeance that does nothing to right any wrong. To say that booing a soldier who is honorably serving his country in a war zone halfway across the world is not just wrong but really, really stupid.
You know, from what we saw in 2008 the last Republican candidate, John McCain, wouldn’t have stood still for this childish nonsense. And McCain lost to a black man.
So if these poseurs lack the stuff to attract a sufficient number of independents, who can they look to in order to have a chance of winning the White House?
They have to feed the pro-death anti-freedom red meat TeaPubers. They have to suck up to the Koch Brothers, Rupert “La Chiffre” Murdoch and their ilk. They need an inspirational leader, one who can capture the media’s attention and motivate new voters, a white Christian heterosexual person who is every bit as bloodthirsty as their base.
Chris Christy? Don’t make me laugh. There is only one person who can rouse the rabble, who can create such a fuss that the TeaPub agenda will appear as the only effective solution to the problems real white Christian heterosexual Americans face every day.
Yes, I hereby nominate the only person likely to do the TeaPub job right.
I nominate the next President of the United States of America, Madame Thérèse Defarge.
So, help us, god.
—-
Red Cat Mike Gold kicks rock’n’blues ass each week on Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind streaming four times a week on www.getthepointradio.com and available at that same venue on demand for those who have weak bladders He also joins MDWers Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com, where he pontificates on matters four-color.
R. Maheras
October 3, 2011 - 7:27 am
I don’t know, Mike… I just can’t get all that indignant about the current Republican electoral process. I see no more back-stabbing partisanship than I’ve in past Democratic (and Republican) presidential races. And while the Tea Party does have strong influence in the Republican Party, is it really any different than nameless bloc of ultra-liberals who “hijacked” the Democratic Party over the past 20-30 years?
And I wouldn’t count out Herman Cain as a possible president or VP candidate. Independents like him, and we all know it’s independents who will decide the next presidential election. Personally (and as I said before), I like his 9-9-9 plan. The current tax system is a disaster, and Cain’s plan would go a long way to simplifing the whole tax process. And it would close most, if not all, the current loopholes in the process. I also like the fact that he has 40 years of executive experience. And while Cain freely admits he’s weak in the area of foreign policy, he said he’s willing to learn. And if America was able to give a free foreign policy pass to Obama, there’s no reason they can’t give one to Cain as well.
Rick Oliver
October 3, 2011 - 8:55 am
Russ:
Who, exactly, are these “ultra-liberals” who have hijacked the Democratic party? Or even more generally, what are some examples of their “ultra-liberal” policies that more otherwise mainstream Democratic candidates have felt compelled to embrace in order to appease the new “ultra-liberal” base?
Bill Mulligan
October 3, 2011 - 9:09 am
I think Cain hurt himself a bit over his indignation toward Perry over the Wash Post “rockgate” nonsense. In fact, I think Perry probably leaked the story himself. Cain seems like a good guy and might even make a good leader but the problem with non-politicians is that they don’t know how to do politics and without that you won’t get the chance to be a political leader.
John Tebbel
October 3, 2011 - 10:53 am
Waiting for Russ to answer Rick.
R. Maheras
October 3, 2011 - 10:58 am
Rick — Who? Liberal intellectuals, that’s who. They pay lip service to the desires and needs of the traditional Democratic base (Catholics and other traditionally Democratic religious organizations; blue-collar workers; minorities, etc.) while wasting an inordinate amount of time and energy on pet ideological issues.
For example, the concerns of Catholics, Baptists and other traditionally Democratic-supportive religions were (and still are) almost totally ignored by the liberal elite during the entire Roe v. Wade abortion debate.
In another example, the ranks of blue-collar workers in this country has been decimated during the past 30 years or so. Part of the problem was due to business leaders looking for cheaper labor elsewhere (Perot’s warning about NAFTA’s “giant sucking sound” of jobs going abroad was prescient), but part of it was also due to inordinately expensive and restrictive environmental policies pushed by ultra liberals.
All that this “not in my backyard” approach has done is helped move millions of middle class jobs overseas, but ultra liberals don’t care one whit because they place “saving the environment” over any blue-collar worker’s needs. An example? There are an estimated 30,000 people out of work in California because irrigation water was shut off from 300,000 acres of (former) farmland in San Joaquin Valley to protect the habitat of an endangered smelt. I drove through that man-made drought area on my way to Reno a few months back and it looks like a frickin’ desert now.
The exportation of industry overseas has been especially devastating to minorities, because in many cases, it was their only middle class, entry-level opportunity. The unemployment level in Democratic bastions like Chicago is a national disgrace, yet community leaders get no love from Washington except, “stop complaining.”
When I graduated from high school in the early 1970s, there were factories galore in the Chicago area and decent paying middle class jobs everywhere. Almost all those factories are now gone, along with all of the smaller firms that provided their tooling, supplies and other services. During a span of six years, I worked four different blue-collar jobs in four totally unrelated industries — all on a high school diploma.
That world is gone now.
In the subsequent decades since, ultra liberals didn’t seem to care that the blue collar folks were losing jobs by the boatload — especially since they could still count on those folks to vote Democratic.
R. Maheras
October 3, 2011 - 11:21 am
I guess, in a nutshell, what mystifies me most about liberal leadership is why their number one priority is not doing everything possible to aid businesses in job creation.
Because the bottom line is that without jobs, none of the other stuff matters.
Bill Mulligan
October 3, 2011 - 11:46 am
I don’t think it’s any more fair to say that ultra-liberals have hijacked the Democratic party than to say that ultra right wingers have hijacked the republicans. Both are examples of trying to demonize the opposition, rather than take on their ideas. And just as there are republicans in high positions who don’t tow the party line on certain issues, the same can be said of the democrats. Reid is anti-abortion. Bill Clinton enacted welfare reform that had some liberals screaming. Al Sharpton is a race baiting police informant. It may not be the biggest tent but there is room in the party for diverse views, at least if you’re the right color.
Rick Oliver
October 3, 2011 - 12:53 pm
Environmental and other regulatory issues played a small role in the exodus of jobs from this country. The real issue is wages. You could remove all those work place safety and environmental regulations tomorrow, and you still wouldn’t bring those jobs back here until American workers are willing to work for poverty-level wages. That’s what we’re competing against.
There is no historical evidence to indicate that excessive government regulation is responsible for our economic woes. The economy hummed along pretty well for decades with plenty of government regulation until we decided it would be a swell idea to take advantage of incredibly cheap labor in (unregulated) third world countries for all our manufacturing needs. This major shift took collusion between both parties and the business community — and has a lot more to do with China’s most favored nation status, NAFTA, and CAFTA than it does with EPA and OSHA.
R. Maheras
October 3, 2011 - 2:01 pm
I don’t agree that environmental and other regulations play only a small role in industries moving away. U.S. industries that must comply with these regulations are at a big disadvantage when competing with competitive industries in other countries that have more relaxed standards.
But, as you point out, that was just one part of the problem anyway.
In the case of NAFTA, which Clinton pushed for and many Democrats supported, including Senators Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Joe Biden. NAFTA was insidious in that it sucked many of the decent-paying manufacturing jobs out of the U.S. and replaced them with lower-paying service-oriented positions. Those manufacturing jobs that left were the exact types of jobs once plentiful to the typical high school graduate. Why an allegedly worker friendly politician would have supported NAFTA is beyond me.
Rick Oliver
October 3, 2011 - 2:42 pm
Yes, Democrats were equally complicit in NAFTA and CAFTA and banking deregulation too.
Rene
October 5, 2011 - 7:42 am
Wow, it’s incredible how different people can interpret reality in insanely different ways.
The American Democrats have been moving steadly to the RIGHT for the past 20-30 years. Both Parties have been somewhat “hijacked” by Conservatives.
Bill Clinton was the last great President, but he was also a Centrist in economic matters that deregulated banking and supported NAFTA, the North-American FREE TRADE Agreement. Clinton choose FREE TRADE over Labour. That is something the REAL ultra-liberals, the kind that riots in WTO conferences, hates.
Both Parties have moved to the Right, but the Democrats have moves a hundred feet, while the Republicans have moved a hundred miles. So there is an optical illusion that the Dems have moved to the Left, simply because they didn’t run to the Right far enough for your Conservative tastes.
America as a whole has moved to the Right in the last 20-30 years, except in a very few areas, such as Gay Rights.
R. Maheras
October 5, 2011 - 11:31 am
Frankly, I don’t care about ideological stuff one whit these days. I think that any politician whose number one priority is not creating jobs and fixing/building the economy should be kicked out of office.
This is Maslow 101, folks. If you don’t have a job, you don’t eat. It doesn’t get any simpler than that.
All of the other stuff, in my opinion, is extraneous window dressing.
I’m now just as frustrated with Obama as I was with Bush the Elder in 1992, and if Obama and certain members of Congress continue to “not get it,” I’ll not shed a single tear when they get voted out of office.
Whitney
October 5, 2011 - 1:43 pm
R. Maheras and All –
Since you said “whit”, I’ll take that as an opportunity to chime in…
Perry said that he would support sending our military troops into Mexico to fight the drug war.
If accurately reported, I’ve not yet heard a more disasterous proposition coming from the mouth of any modern candidate in recent memory.
Rick Oliver
October 6, 2011 - 11:42 am
Everyone cheerfully agrees that we need to create jobs. Hooray. Problem solved. Everyone agrees. Just create some jobs and many of our problems will become less severe. Republicans offer a faith-based solution (political, not religious, faith), devoid of any actual factual evidence to support it. They just like the sound of it. Democrats offer…not much of anything other than temporary infrastructure repair work. Both parties assiduously avoid the real cause of the problem because both parties actively participated in the dismantling of our manufacturing base.
Our manufacturing base is GONE, and it’s not coming back until things get a whole lot worse than they already are. We’re not willing to work for a dollar a day…yet. We’re not ready to live in cardboard boxes…yet. We’re not willing to work in a a toxic environment…yet.
But get rid of the EPA, OSHA, minimum wage laws, child labor laws, and all those other pesky regulations that are preventing our inherent greatness from blossoming, and we’ll soon see a brave new era in which we will all be free to live like illegal aliens — only worse!