Rutgers Closes On Saturday Night, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #271 | @MDWorld
April 16, 2012 Mike Gold 3 Comments
I presume Rutgers University has a program that instructs students in the Vulcan Mind Meld.
The New Jersey school of higher education publishes a weekly satirical newspaper called The Daily Medium, sort of like The Onion but even more amateurish. Two weeks ago they ran an editorial titled “What about the good things Hitler did?” Whether the piece was funny is, of course, in the mind of the beholder; such is the nature of humor. “Bad taste” is also in the mind of the beholder and we, as humans, have no right to protection from what we consider to be in bad taste. That’s how free speech works. You might get offended, but free speech isn’t there to protect anybody’s point of view, so get over it.
As is often the case with many of these types of publications, these jibes usually carry a bullshit by-line attributed to a known individual – sort of like Steve Allen’s ancient letters to the editor routine on the original Tonight Show. That would date the bit at least back to the 1950s.
This Hitler satire was by-lined to Aaron Marcus, a Jewish student and columnist for the independent student paper The Daily Targum. Mr. Marcus says he was highly offended by the piece because he lost family in the Holocaust. Well, so did I, Mr. Marcus, so we both own condos on that moral high ground. But we don’t own the same opinion.
The operative phrase here is “satirical.” The Daily Medium is well-known to be a satirical publication. That means what’s in it is not factual and, if you’re the one with the petard sticking out of your gut, you just might be offended. Get over it.
He believes the choice to use his name is an example of Anti-Semitism. Mr. Marcus, look up the word “irony.” If you think that is Anti-Semitism, you haven’t gotten out much. It’s a satirical newspaper, and as a by-lined columnist, you are a celebrity in your community. Give me a call when they burn a cross on your front lawn, as the Klan did to my grandfather.
So now the President of Rutgers University has condemned the publication and the school is conducting an investigation. I don’t understand what they’re investigating, but of course the phrase “hate crime” has been bandied about quite a bit. It would take a Vulcan Mind Meld to make this claim work, but I postulate that if hatred were in the hearts of the editors and advisors of The Daily Medium they would have chosen a medium different from satire.
Mr. Marcus told a local paper “Rutgers has perpetually done nothing to protect Jewish students … If these types of things happened to other students on campus they would be taken care of immediately, but when they happen to Jewish students and particularly pro-Israeli students, they are ignored.”
Aaron, I would not challenge your statement. Odds are strong that there’s at least some degree of accuracy therein. I went to school in the southwestern portion of the Ohio River Valley, a region that at the time was particularly hostile towards Jews. And to blacks. And particularly to Jews who thought shooting blacks was a bad idea, and there was a lot of that going on in nearby Cairo Illinois at the time. So I’ve had more than just a taste of this sort of behavior in the halls of academe, and I sympathize.
But attacking a satirical piece in a defined satirical publication, even if your celebrity was taken in vain, belittles the true horror of bigotry. You are only showing off your own pettiness and lack of perspective. Anti-Semitism is not about what is or is not funny, and it’s certainly not about you.
Get over it.
—
Cult-Leader-For-Hire Mike Gold performs the Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind rock’n’blues show, which streams four times a week on www.getthepointradio.com and is also available at that same venue On Demand. He also joins Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com.
Rick Oliver
April 16, 2012 - 8:09 am
Remember your idea to publish a magazine called “Lies”?
Jeremiah Avery
April 16, 2012 - 10:50 am
People’s feelings aren’t protected under the Constitution. As you said, Mike, this was in a satirical publication and not someone legitimately trying to sing the praises of a hate monger.
People need to look at context.
Rick Oliver
April 16, 2012 - 12:25 pm
Under the new Arizona law, I can sue you if you hurt my feelings online. So if the magazine is available online, Marcus can sue in the state of Arizona.
Martha Thomases
April 16, 2012 - 1:17 pm
It’s not a hate crime because it’s not a crime. It might be hateful, but that isn’t a crime either. As evidence, I point out that Donald Trump is walking free.
David Quinn
April 16, 2012 - 4:11 pm
Not enough banjo for me, sorry. 5 string or 4, it’s got that fresh, expansive open tuning… and when you’re playing a banjo, it’s hard to hate.
David Oakes
April 16, 2012 - 4:41 pm
It wasn’t a hate crime because it wasn’t hateful. It was a cheap shot, like Photoshopping a cheese burger into a photo of Ghandi on a hunger strike.
But it was a crime, because they used his name without permission. Yes, it’s “Satire” and even a “Well Known Joke”. But in the end it is no different than me writing comics under the by-line “Mike Gold”. Not Libel, but Copyright Infringement.
On the Internet, all we have is our name. And that is hard enough to keep in the face of Sock Puppets and Hacked Twitter Accounts. You wouldn’t defend those as “Free Speech”, and there is no reason to defend this nonsense either. You can defend Hitler all you want. But credit where credit is due, please.
R. Maheras
April 17, 2012 - 12:22 am
Mark my words, in 20 years the stand-up comedy bits of Don Rickles, Lenny Bruce and Richard Pryor will be banned, as will all of the Dean Martin Roasts.
Mike Gold
April 17, 2012 - 6:38 pm
20 years? I say three. Some group will slam cable companies hard to drop “immoral programs” … “for the sake of the children.”
Better double-bag those George Carlin DVDs.
Rene
April 17, 2012 - 6:51 pm
Isn’t this closer to libel? Praising Hitler in a public forum is a sure way to become anathema. For instance, if I say Russ Maheras is a Hitler supporter, publishing a lot of articles in Russ’s name, I can say all I want that it’s a joke, but people just glancing at the articles may think Russ is a true neo-nazi. And that can cause all sorts of embarassment to Russ.
.
It’s not as if this Aaron Marcus is famous. I never heard of the guy before, or of the Rutgers paper. Just glancing at this headline, I would just assume he is a neo-nazi.
Doug Abramson
April 17, 2012 - 8:16 pm
Rene,
If you were publishing those articles in a forum that is known for serious news and or opinion, it probably would be libel. In this case though, it appears that the article was published in a paper that is well known in the community for publishing satire and the name placed on the article as the author is equally well known (thus a public figure) in the community as being pro-Israeli and thus unlikely to be pro-Nazi. Since a reasonable person should be able to see satirical paper + unlikely author and come up with the realization that the article was a prank. Its borderline bad taste and totally unnecessary, but I don’t think that it rises to libel.
R. Maheras
April 18, 2012 - 10:26 am
Mike — George Carlin? Geez! He’s probably the equivalent of a Politically Correct Anti-Christ.
Mike Gold
April 18, 2012 - 11:13 am
Russ, that was brilliant. And I’m stealing it.
dr. bernhard rosenberg
April 26, 2012 - 5:23 pm
Subject: anti-SEMITISM AT RUTGERS
to the editor
After countless, phone calls, messages, emails, and letters, to deans, heads of departments, and the president of Rutgers himself, many concerned students and myself remain left in the dark and our questions unanswered. Our beloved Professor Dr. Rosenberg, has been a victim of the anti-semetic environment that has been created and allowed to grow at Rutgers University. Dr. Rosenberg has been facing many instances of harassment by department heads, deans, and leaders for no reason. He has made many formal complaints and reports to numerous departments over a span of many weeks, and the only response he and us students receive are very rude responses that simply say “thanks” and that this is a personnel matter. This is not the way that a prestigious university, the state university of New Jersey should be handling the serious concerns that its staff and students have regarding harassment, more specifically, anti-semitism. It was not until one of the Rutgers university daily newspapers, The Medium, published an article entitled “What About the Good Things Hitler Did?” In this article, the Medium praised Hitler and said he wasn’t such a bad guy, The medium used an active Jewish students name, and picture as the author of the article, when he in fact had no relation to the article. This is one instance that was made known due to the severity and availability of the evidence since it was published in a newspaper allowed by Rutgers to be circulated throughout campus. Unfortunately for Dr. Rosenberg, the anti-semtism he faces from the department is not published in newspapers, and therefore is not as easily seen by others. however this does not mean that this serious issue can be ignored. Dr. Rosenberg is one of the only professor here at Rutgers that willingly and proudly wears a “skullcap” every day, clearly revealing his Jewish religion. Also a clergyman, he often speaks publicly about his religious views as well as others. He respects all religions and simply wished that people would do the same for his. Now Dr. Rosenberg has lost his opportunity to teach his public speaking course which he does every summer for over 10 years. He is not getting a response as to whether or not he will be teaching in the fall, and the harassment continues. The fact of the matter is that Rutgers University has created an anti-semitic atmosphere and has let it thrive to the point where students feel comfortable publishing anti-semetic articles in a well known school newspaper. Rutgers University allows this paper to circulate throughout campus just like they allow their main newspaper “The Daily Targum” which refuses to address this issue after numerous requests. Overall, something must be done about the anti-semitic injustices Dr. Rosenberg has and still is facing here at Rutgers University.
As we are in the midst of concluding the Spring Semester, we the students of Doctor Rosenberg want you to know that this has been on of the most enjoyable non pressure, insightful, and exciting courses we have ever taken at Rutgers. Unlike other teachers, through his dynamic teaching abilities and intuitive nature, he instills within his students the desire to constantly improve. He does this not through pressure, numerous papers, constant criticism, but through a magic that he possesses to convey his belief in his students abilities to perform. In short he makes public speaking fun. While we have followed the syllabus he has done so with great humor, intelligence, creativity, and sensitivity. We have heard from other students how unhappy they are in other public speaking classes. How even though they deserve an A, the grades have been severely lessened because of their written work on first drafts. Dr. Rosenberg has made this a true public speaking class. He has corrected out outlines and given us tests but from both we have learned much without stress and pressure. It is beyond our understanding why our teacher should be harassed when he in fact deserves the teacher of the year award at Rutgers.
Sincerely the Concerned Students of Dr. Rosenberg’s class,
Nicole Honey
Jackson Udelsman
Leonora Slatnick
Lucas Blebelberg
Rob Beringer
Ruslana Trytas
Megan Caylor
Justic Brown
Rebecca Sampayo
Prahlad Annamraju
Karina Veliz
Loren Williams
Meagan Robinson
Felicia O’Donnell
Allison Payenski
Camille Handy
Shama Jhaveri
Hyeri Ahn
dr. bernhard rosenberg
July 13, 2012 - 2:42 pm
Posted: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:00 am
Contracts disatisfy part-time lecturersBy Matthew Matilsky / Staff WriterDailyTargum.com | 1 comment
A part-time lecturer accused the University of being unfair toward part-time employees in a YouTube video, which was eventually shared on Twitter by former University football team players, Ray Rice and Khaseem Greene.
His business card reads “Rabbi Dr. Bernhard H. Rosenberg,” professor at Yeshiva University and part-time lecturer in the Department of Communication at the University. Rosenberg recently learned he would not be teaching public speaking at the University this summer, a course he has taught for 23 years.
He thinks he lost his job over trivial arguments because his relationships within the department are unsteady.
Karen Novick, associate dean of the Department of Communication, said Rosenberg’s case is a “personnel issue” and did not indicate whether enrollment levels were the exact issue.
“Within the department as a whole I believe enrollments were down a little,” Novick said.
But Rosenberg’s dissatisfaction with the University is shared among part-time lecturers across departments.
dr. bernhard rosenberg
July 15, 2012 - 6:16 pm
DR. ROSENBERG SPEAKS OUT. THE TEACHER WHO CARES. THE ROSENBERG REVOLTION SHARE WITH OTHERS. REGARDING RUTGERS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlhvPRkS9a8&feature=youtu.be