Food Fight! by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #278 | @MDWorld
June 11, 2012 Mike Gold 16 Comments
Last Saturday I had the great pleasure of joining my fellow columnist Martha Thomases and two wonderful Detroit friends for brunch at a Manhattan restaurant. Nothing can be finer than good banter in a diner… in the morning.
This particular place was as unique as most other surviving Lower East Side institutions: a two-sided color photocopied menu with all sorts of concoctions ranging from the seemingly healthy to the obscenely dangerous. Despite the fact that three of the four of us are skinny as hell (ahem) and obviously work hard to stay that way, we had a meal with a combined calorie count that could feed Haiti for a month. Mine was possibly, and preposterously, the healthiest and I had homemade barbecue brisket (of course) with sweet pickles, some sort of strange purply-green vegetable, and a homemade raspberry foamy beverage.
Therefore it could come as no surprise that the prevailing conversation among this witty, intelligent, fast and very political group was about New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s recent proclamation that New York will banish all sales of soda in containers larger than 16 ounces. Not a single thing on our table would be banned except, arguably, my raspberry beverage. We had enough congealing grease on those plates to oil the entire Manhattan subway fleet, but Mayor Mike wasn’t going after that. It was the 17+ounce soda that had to be stopped.
Hello? Compared to what? The mystery meat sold from carts on nearly every New York corner? The Nathan’s hot dog? Everything else on each and every fast-food menu in town… as well as most of the restaurants, both hoity and toity?
The Born Again Koch-Sucking Tea Baggers have been employing a very useful phrase, “nanny state,” and whose meaning they have since twisted into a pustular perversion, just as they did to the word “family.” This action is representative of the nanny state. We as adults have the right to make our own decisions regarding stuff that doesn’t affect others – most certainly, which evils we choose to consume. Are some of these decisions stupid and self-destructive? Certainly. I’ve jumped out of airplanes, gone bungee-jumping, taken ill-defined recreational drugs, and had sex with at least a few women who were obviously from other planets. And I eat barbecue as though it’s next on Bloomberg’s list.
Now if you’re going to respond with an argument about the health costs of ill-advised eating, you are going to lose. You do not want to go there. If you do, to be fair you’d have to ban alcohol, aspirin, many of not most pharmaceuticals, automobiles, jet engines, air conditioners, headphones, electricity production plants, factories, cows, insects, corn, lettuce, plastics, arms manufacturers, college fraternities and sororities, military organizations, and religion. It’s a really, really stupid and self-righteous argument.
To their credit, it appears most food fascists refuse to support the Bloomberg ban, including the most eloquent of their lot, Mets co-owner Bill (“but I kid food fascists”) Maher. The government should be advising us about such issues – the present First Lady’s health campaign, the previous First Lady’s literacy campaign – and I’m certainly in favor of ingredient listings and calorie counts: information that will allow us to make our own decisions. Food inspections and labor safety regulations are good things, as while I’m willing to chow down a Vienna hot dog, I’m not interested in an imbedded thumb.
Unfortunately, Michael Bloomberg doesn’t need anybody’s consent to push his initiative through. But the citizens of the city of New York are going to spend a fortune enforcing it and defending it in court.
Talk about out-of-control health costs…
—-
Mike Gold, whose blues name really is Barbecue Bones Jones, performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com, every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, replayed three times during the week (check the website above for times) and available On Demand at the same place, so listen to it already! He also joins Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com, where he pontificates on matters of four-color.
Jeremiah Avery
June 11, 2012 - 10:18 am
This is also the same guy who praised the Nathan’s hot-dog eating challenge as well as celebrated “National Donut Day”. When Matt Lauer (of all people) called Bloomberg out on it, Bloomberg said how anything in moderation is okay. Hello, hypocrite! Plus, certain places are exempt. It’s asinine.
Mike Gold
June 11, 2012 - 10:39 am
I am SO pissed. I TOTALLY missed National Donut Day.
But even I think the Nathan’s contest is gross. But, hey, if that’s what you want to do, well, there’s no such thing as a second-hand hot dog pig out and you’re not compelled to watch.
I wonder. Do they test contestants for THC content in the blood? Hell, I’d have to smoke half of Columbia in order to just get up to that stage.
Rick Oliver
June 11, 2012 - 1:40 pm
Look for insurance companies to start retroactively denying coverage due to your eating and drinking habits.
Vinnie Bartilucci
June 11, 2012 - 2:39 pm
Bloomberg, like Guiliani before him, thinks he’s solved all the other problems of NYC, and has nothing to do, so he makes little projects for himself. Rudy went after painting of the Madonna made from poop, and Mike goes after Big Gulps.
Jon Stewart got it perfect – “This combines the invasion into personal lives democrats love, with the lack of results they expect”.
Me, I’d start a new promotion at my restaurant: “Free empty 32-oz cup with purchase of two 16-oz sodas”.
Mike Gold
June 11, 2012 - 2:44 pm
Rick, I’m amazed insurance companies haven’t just come out and said it: “We deny coverage to anybody who might actually need it. Die, fuckers!”
Mike Gold
June 11, 2012 - 3:01 pm
As much as I loathe Mayor NineEleven, I can understand why he might have felt a little hinky about a painting of one of his big religious icons made from shit. Banning it, no, that’s wrong and unconstitutional; being pissed, sure. Wasn’t that the point?
Next convention, I’m gonna buy me one of those big-ass Ghostbusters ghost-sucker pacs and take it to Manhattan and tell ’em to fill it with soda.
Pennie
June 11, 2012 - 4:37 pm
Mike wrote:
Rick, I’m amazed insurance companies haven’t just come out and said it: “We deny coverage to anybody who might actually need it. Die, fuckers!”
Please, don’t get me too wound up. Just had a CT scan. When I pro-activbely called my insurance company to find out coverage boundaries and prices, I was informed that CT scans for preventative measures were completely covered but disgnostic CT scans were fully billable. Had to consider this. Who walks into a Dr.’s office and requests a CT scan on a whim just to check things out? They had to admit there has never been a CT scan coded to this novel approach.
Insurance scammers….
Jeremiah Avery
June 11, 2012 - 4:39 pm
Mike, re: the hot dog eating contest – there was some controversy regarding one frequent “champion”. There was speculation he had surgery that suppressed his body’s indicators that signaled when one was full. Crazy stuff and I really can’t call those competitors “athletes”.
The ban is absurd and this will sound petty but I’ll proudly support banning anything supporters of this nonsense enjoy.
Mike Gold
June 11, 2012 - 7:11 pm
If food eaters are athletes, then I’m Michael Jordan.
Mike Gold
June 11, 2012 - 7:19 pm
Pennie, you’re absolutely right. But in this case, that CT scan was worth it.
Fuck cancer, indeed. But the insurance ghouls don’t even deserve sloppy seconds. Fuck the insurance industry. Fuck them very much.
Jeremiah Avery
June 11, 2012 - 9:09 pm
Not to stray too far off topic but the problems with the insurance industry is one reason why I’m against the individual mandate. Just because you would have insurance that you’re paying for, does not mean you’ll actually have coverage. Far too many get tests and treatments delayed due to the insurance companies refusing to pay for them. It’s great to not have people denied based upon pre-existing conditions but there are way too many loopholes that politicians refuse to close which cause harm to others.
Doug Abramson
June 12, 2012 - 1:22 am
Mike, you have too much pigmentation to be Michael Jackson.
Mike Gold
June 12, 2012 - 2:01 am
Yep. And I have my own nose, too.
And I’m too short to be Michael Jordan. And I can’t fly.
Rick Oliver
June 12, 2012 - 10:08 am
A CT scan doesn’t “prevent” anything. It’s a diagnostic tool. So in this case it sounds like the insurance company simply won’t cover any standard use of a CT scan. The next time the insurance company denies a claim, don’t be surprised if they ask, “How’s the naked lady?”
Mike Gold
June 12, 2012 - 11:03 am
To a cynic — and, of course that’s not me — a CT scan can prevent needless worry and even needless medical procedures. Worry isn’t the concern of the insurance company, unless it’s the needless generation of worry. But one would think preventing needless medical procedures would be.
One would think. Which is more than I can say about those assholes.
Which is why I’m not particularly welcome in Hartford CT.
Whitney
June 16, 2012 - 12:28 am
Wouldn’t the vendors end up making more money on this, due to people buying two drinks rather than one, or a smaller one which have a higher margin?
I’d be curious to see what lobbying money went into this…