MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Let Him Kill Himself, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #280 | @MDWorld

June 25, 2012 Mike Gold 20 Comments

The commonwealth of Pennsylvania has put convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky on “suicide watch.” I’m not exactly certain what that entails – do they have a guard staring at him 24/7? – but there is one mammoth, overwhelming question rattling around my brainpan.

Why bother?

For the purpose of conversation, let us assume the “risk” of suicide here is legitimate. We only have the commonwealth’s word on this, and personally I have a hard time presuming the disgusting piece of filth they’re watching has anywhere near the class or the conscience to do the right thing.

Be that as it may, as of this writing Pennsylvania is nearing $135 billion in debt. That’s over ten grand for every man, woman and child living within its borders. If, as Republicans insist, we cut what they define as unnecessary expenses, it’s pretty hard to define keeping a convicted child molester alive against his own will as necessary.

Then again, I’m not a football fan.

Sandusky has yet to be sentenced, but the death penalty isn’t in the cards. He can be sentenced to some 400 years in the hoosegow, but if so he’s unlikely to serve the full term. Even if he makes it to 80 twelve years from now, that means the citizenry is likely to spend in excess of one half of one million dollars keeping this piece of morally postulant detritus breathing (allegedly) against his own will. I’m including medical expenses here; being a septuagenarian ain’t no walk in the park – particularly if your park is made of barbed wire and metal bars.

We have this ridiculous hang-up about suicide. I acknowledge, to my disgust, that this comes from people’s perception of the desires of their hoary thunderer. That is no excuse in a so-called free society. A person can be suffering from an absolutely fatal disease and be in constant horrific pain and agony, but we will not allow him or her to voluntarily move up that unknowable sell-by date.

Worse still, we do this in the name of “morality.” We contrive all sorts of nonsensical reasons to disallow the practice – let alone make it as painless as possible – but, in fact, we are sentencing hundreds of thousands of people to a continued life of agony and hopelessness. Even people who are not filthy child molesters.

Who is to decide? A family that professes love but will not end the suffering and agony? Some sanctimonious flotsam of hypocritical, hate-fostering “morality?” You? It’s not your decision to make. It’s not your will to impose. Not even on a serial child rapist like Sandusky.

Morality? Give me a break. People who are anti-suicide are pro-torture. If we’re the merciful society we claim to be, let people decide to end their agony if they so desire. Once again, I recall that most conservative of true conservative values: mind your own business.

Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com , every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week (check the website above for times) and available On Demand at the same place, so listen to it already! He also joins Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Doug Abramson
    June 25, 2012 - 11:27 am

    While I won’t shed a tear when this jerk finally bites it, the state can’t afford to let him commit suicide, at least in the near term. Since various Federal courts, including the conservative ones, have established that the states are responsible for prisoners’ welfare; letting the dirtball kill himself after someone decided that it was a reasonable possibility, would make the state negligent and open to a multi-million dollar lawsuit. The suicide watch is cheap by comparison. Hopefully, he’ll off himself after whatever the reasonable time frame is for a suicide watch. If he does it when its not expected, no successful lawsuit. Same thing if someone is planning on shanking him. If they leave him alone a few months, the state wouldn’t have a reasonable responsibility to give him extra protection. If everyone is patient, the universe should hopefully even things out with this creep.

  2. Rick Oliver
    June 25, 2012 - 11:51 am

    If he’s such a suicide risk, why wasn’t this a concern prior to the conviction? One might conclude that it’s not his crimes that have caused him to be suicidal, but the thought of serving a 400 year sentence for those crimes — in which case, justice might best be served by making sure he serves as much of that sentence as possible. And, hey, maybe the Pennsylvania prison system will get a profitable football program out of it.

  3. Mike Gold
    June 25, 2012 - 12:04 pm

    Doug, we’d have to change the law. The self-condemned would have to sign off on all liabilities, making this act completely of free will and not at any insistence from the prison, inmates, or the government at large, and maybe a six-month waiting period — he could change his mind, once, at any point up to 24 hours before the suicide. And whatever means is deemed acceptable should be entirely deployed by the self-condemned without any assistance other than a nice room (or balcony) and an escort to same. After all, I am opposed to the death penalty.

    Not that I’ve thought this one out.

  4. Mike Gold
    June 25, 2012 - 12:11 pm

    Rick, a couple years ago they did a remake of The Longest Yard, and I just don’t see Adam Sandler taking the part of Jerry Sandusky for a sequel. Although I guess Burt Reynolds might.

    Now, if they made it as a “reality-based” teevee show (in the sense that LSD is “reality-based”), it could run for years with the same cast. And Pennsylvania can maximize its revenues.

    The Geico tie-in spot would be fantastic.

  5. Bill Mulligan
    June 25, 2012 - 12:28 pm

    Mike, while I would sleep an untroubled sleep should Sandusky figure out some way to off himself, I can’t go along with this.

    Maybe it’s my conservative nature–since it’s now conservatives who have taken up the once liberal mantle of “don’t trust the government!”–but I see a lot of danger in that. In a prison we have a situation where we have a small group with near absolute authority over a larger group with near absolute subjugation. We have, as you point out, a very big financial incentive to want to see these people die. They have less political power and influence than just about any group in the country. The people who would defend them are only slightly less despised than they are. And you want to encourage or at least openly tolerate suicide among them?

    Not only do I see a real potential for abuse there, I almost can’t see any other outcome. You don;t have to be Ray Bradbury to imagine not only an awful lot of suicides happening but policies being enacted to make that possibility even more likely.

    It costs more money to make prisons less of a hellhole than it would to make them a place where prisoners give themselves a death penalty we refuse to dole out because of a perceived sense of humanity. We’re too good for that! But allow prisons to be so inhuman that suicide becomes a pretty reasonable choice…hey, shit happens.

    If he really really wants to do it I’m sure he can figure out a way, as can most terminal patients–sometimes it seems like the only people who say they can’t get access to drugs are the terminally ill–but we had better think long and hard before we encourage suicide. Yeah, there are abuses on the other side as well (although there are also maybe better solutions–some places are awfully stingy with the pain medications, making suicide the only way to stop agony. I’d like to see some action that would allow terminally ill patients to get as much medication as they deem fit. Of course, it would have to come with protection for the doctors who might be sued by family members if their uncle dies from an OD on Thursday rather than on Saturday when the cancer would have hit his brain.)

    But with prisons I think we have to bite the bullet and do what it takes to ensure the men and women incarcerated are treated with a level of humanity and decency that may well be better than they deserve. Only then would it be ethical to allow or encourage them to take their own lives. We can’t have prisons as godawful as they are now and pretend that prison suicides are the prisoner’s own choice with no responsibility falling on us.

    This would all be much more affordable if prisons were mostly full of people who needed to be there to protect the rest of us and not because they chose to pollute their own bodies with whatever chemicals they need to make their dull existence bearable. End the war on drugs.

  6. Martha Thomses
    June 25, 2012 - 12:28 pm

    But the Pope wouldn’t like it!

  7. Rick Oliver
    June 25, 2012 - 12:33 pm

    My comment was partly inspired by “Death Race”, the recent remake of “Death Race 2000”. I never saw Corman’s original, but I think the remake would have been better as a Bruce Campbell film.

  8. Rick Oliver
    June 25, 2012 - 12:37 pm

    Bill: As we steadily privatize prisons, the real money for the folks running the prisons is in keeping the head count high; so keeping them alive has a financial incentive. They’d probably make you pay a penalty fee for “opting out”.

    “I’m sorry, but you haven’t earned enough corporate credits to commit suicide.”

  9. Mike Gold
    June 25, 2012 - 12:45 pm

    Bill: Of course, we’re in complete agreement about the so-called war on so-called drugs. So let’s go for a happy medium: give the self-condemned heroin. Pure uncut heroin. In the locked room: guards put the syringe on the table with some rubber tubing and, I dunno, some rubbing alcohol because we want to maintain our sense of humor. Maybe a cot with a pillow. Escort the self-condemned into the room and lock the door behind him. It’s his choice. Perhaps his estate could be charged for the smack. Sell the video rights to MSNBC for their post-Rachel Friday night lock-up show. Give the money to the victims.

  10. Mike Gold
    June 25, 2012 - 12:47 pm

    Martha: Hey, still another good reason!

  11. Jonathan (the other one)
    June 25, 2012 - 1:02 pm

    I’m weird; personally, I consider the death penalty more merciful than locking someone into an 8×11 cage for the rest of his life.

    On the other hand, I’m not sure Sandusky merits the mercy of death…

  12. David Oakes
    June 25, 2012 - 1:26 pm

    Society letting people kill themselves rather than face prison is as sick and cowardly as letting a person kill themselves because their seratonin levels are a bit off. Even more so, because (usually) a chemical imbalance is not due to an act of the People. (We are a Democracy. Don’t try and hide behind “The Goverment” here.)

  13. Mike Gold
    June 25, 2012 - 3:44 pm

    Jonathan, I completely agree with both paragraphs of your comment.

  14. Mike Gold
    June 25, 2012 - 3:50 pm

    David: well, no we’re not a democracy. We’re a republic. And that other republic, the one where they conquered most of Europe and had orgies and stuff, thought suicide was okay. They offered suicide as an option to many bigwigs who fell out of favor. “Falling on your sword” was the thing to do, under certain circumstances. Many eastern cultures have a similar heritage.

    Nonetheless, as offensive as suicide is to some — not my concern — it is the ultimate, and perhaps the only truly unalienable right.

    And, as always, I’m limiting my argument to consenting adults. Or in Rick Santorum’s case, consenting adult humans.

  15. Mike Gold
    June 25, 2012 - 3:52 pm

    Rick: The privatization of prisons is the main and overwhelming reason I despair for the legalization of drugs. Too much money to be made from locking people up. In America, it’s our biggest growth industry.

    However, the idea of “Buy American!” campaigns aimed by marijuana growers is somewhat pleasing.

  16. Rick Oliver
    June 26, 2012 - 8:47 am

    “Too much money to be made from locking people up.”

    I don’t really understand the economic model for privatizing prisons. I guess the theory is that the private sector can do it cheaper, but it’s still our tax dollars paying for it — so, eventually the profit incentive will make private prisons more expensive in terms of total cost to the taxpayer, although the cost per inmate will theoretically be lower. So, in the long run we’ll have higher total costs and higher prison populations. Sounds like a lose-lose for most of us.

  17. Mike Gold
    June 26, 2012 - 11:57 am

    Well, let’s see. You live in the Greater Chicagoland area (out east, I tell people “Chicagoland” is the part of Disneyland where everybody wears pin-striped suits and carries a machine gun). So you know what happened when they privatized the street parking meters. The cost went up, like, four-fold? Mom’n’pop shops folded because nobody could afford to park near ’em? Have you driven on the Chicago Skyway since it was privatized? Chase has a lending office on each side of the bridge.

    So, no, privatizing doesn’t make things cheaper. It just makes rich businessmen all the more rich. It’s a lose-lose for everybody but these rich thieves.

  18. Jeremiah Avery
    June 29, 2012 - 8:07 am

    It’s also disturbing that he gets to keep his $59K a year pension because Pennsylvania doesn’t consider sex crimes heinous enough to strip someone of their state pension. Yet those college officials charged with perjury will lose it, go figure.

    I say don’t give him all 400+ years, take some of that jail time and give it to those who knew what happened and did nothing about it.

    It may sound harsh but in cases like this, I’m all for some “prison justice” being meted out.

  19. Whitney
    June 29, 2012 - 11:00 am

    Golden Boy –

    I’ve never been able to find a prohibition against suicide in the Bible. “Thou shalt not murder” is a more accurate translation, and this means killing in violation of law.

    Just finished watching my TiVO of “I, Claudius”. His conniving wife was offered the knife to take herself out like a good Roman or face beheading. When I first saw this as a kid, that scene terrified me. Now, I see it through different eyes and…I dunno…seems like a good idea.

  20. Mike Gold
    June 29, 2012 - 1:20 pm

    Well, it’s a noble idea.

    I don’t understand the biblical interpretation that signifies opposition to suicide, other than suicide is, by definition, murder and maybe that’s sufficient for these folks. However, I’ve known and heard from quite a few religionists who feel strongly about suicide, going past appalled into apoplectic. Historically, I usually put this in the same file as George Carlin’s “doing eternity for a beef jerky.” Just stuff I don’t understand and believers can’t explain.

Comments are closed.