MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

The Campaign Is Over, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #286 | @MDWorld

August 6, 2012 Mike Gold 6 Comments

It’s now just a game of Red Rover. On one side, there’s the hardcore right, the “we’ve got to get rid of that Muslim Commie Obama” crowd. On the other side, there’s the hardcore left, the “The Tea Party’s Coming! The Tea Party’s Coming!” crowd.

Except nobody’s breaking through the lines. Get used to it. The hardcores are so hardcore they’re X-rated.

What’s left are the so-called independents, the ones who find neither Obama nor Romney appealing. Perhaps they’re scared by the people behind the candidates. Perhaps they consider Obama a nice guy but ineffective and Romney a panderer who will take any position to get elected. Perhaps they’re put off by Obama’s race and/or perceived religion, and they’re equally put off by Romney’s actual religion and his hidden tax returns.

Let’s face it. Some see Barack as Nipsey Russell and Mitt as Chatsworth Osborne Junior. These are people we call “morons.” And these morons are going to do what morons always do every four years: they either don’t show up, or they cancel each other’s vote.

So the only real game in town is called “getting out the vote.” To win this game, you’ve got to get your hardcore to come out 100% while hoping yours is bigger than the other guy’s. In politics, size counts.

Make no mistake about it. Romney’s infuriating performance in England, Poland and Israel got his core to stand up and cheer. “Screw the A-rabs! Screw the Brits! This is white Christian America and god loves us!”

No politician ever went wrong pissing on the Brits during an election. My favorite story involves (of course) former Chicago mayor Big Bill Thompson, best known for being the last Republican ever elected mayor – he lost the seat in 1931 – and for selling Al Capone the keys to the city. Big Bill once stood before the City Council and stated King George V of England was the greatest threat to the United States and that, if George V were to visit Chicago (there were no plans) Thompson would “bust him on the snoot.”

The ravings of a childishly stupid politician? Hell, no. Chicago had – and has – a preposterously huge Irish population. Add to that the hardcore right’s view that the Queen of England, the Jews (particularly the Rothschild family) and the other dynastic families run the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and most of the global intelligence agencies, and you’re rallying the troops.

As for Romney’s insulting the Arabs, well, if you don’t think that’s been a matter of great sport here in the freedom-loving United States of America ever since Giuliani Day, I suggest you try and open up a Muslim cultural center.

Obama is playing to his base of blacks, women, Hispanics (hand-delivered to him by the Republicans), liberals, Muslims, socialists, and just about everybody who isn’t either a Christian zealot, a white middle-class male, and/or stupidly wealthy. And even that latter group is split. His supporters wish he got to that point years ago, but clearly losing his Pollyanna glow has bolstered his hardcore.

What’s going to affect the outcome? As I said, the size of the hardcore turnout and, to a lesser extent, the whim of the so-called undecided independents – many of which, history tells us, won’t make up their minds until it’s too late for them to show up in the polling.

There are three other important factors that will affect the outcome. First, the tsunami of Jim Crow laws being passed by the Republicans all across the nation, targeted to disenfranchise blacks, the poor, and others more likely to vote Democratic. Second, individual precincts’ abilities to steal the vote – a factor in any national election – by such tactics as lying about polling places, times, and even dates.

Finally, there are the local elections. A good solid race on the municipal, county or state level will mobilize some voters. You might not care about Obama or Romney, but you just might care about your Senate race or the Gubernatorial campaign or gay marriage. And as long as you’re there anyway and you made it through the new voter voir dire, you might as well select between the incompetent jerks on top. “It doesn’t matter anyway; they’re all the same.”

Yeah. Say that to the next Supreme Court justices.

—-
A man who loves voting so much he shows up for school board elections and votes Libertarian, Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com , every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week (check the website above for times) and available On Demand at the same place. He also joins Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Vinnie Bartilucci
    August 6, 2012 - 11:16 am

    Never before in recorded history has there been an election where a viable third party candidate was more needed.

    Both represent the extreme views of both parties, when it’s clear to me (at least) that in almost every case, the problems the country need a solution closer to the middle, perhaps leaning to one side or the other, case by case. And I think no matter what happens in November, we’ll see one or the other party fold its arms and stonewall anything the other side does, no matter how helpful it might actually be. In other words, more of the same.

    I keep hoping (ok, dreaming) that Mitt does something so colossally addlepated before the election that the party at least considers replacing him. I know it won’t happen, but I gotta say, for the last few Presidential elections, I’ve found myself asking “Really? This is the best we have?”

    I honestly believe it’s arrogance. Both parties have been guilty of it – being so sure they’ll win, they put up a crap candidate as a handicap, the electoral equivalent of putting one hand behind their back.

  2. Martha Thomases
    August 6, 2012 - 11:33 am

    Vinnie is a hard-core centrist. I only wish he were the lefty that the right paints him to be.

    Just ask the folks in Guantanamo.

  3. Mike Gold
    August 6, 2012 - 11:35 am

    VIABLE third party candidate? Have we ever had one?

    I don’t think Obama represents any extreme at all. In fact, overall he’s right of center, a nice-guy version of Nixon and just as competitive. He’s hardly Eugene Debs. No real socialist would lift his head out of his own puke to call Barack a liberal.

    We have no political parties. Just large nut groups that can deliver voters in a vacuum. The Republicans had a number of people who would have served us well, but the fools chased them all out of the party. Dig up John Anderson, clamp jumper cables to his neck, hook ’em up to an Escalade and step on the gas. He just might win this time.

  4. Mike Gold
    August 6, 2012 - 11:49 am

    Okay, Guantanamo. Here’s a plug, courtesy of our pal Timothy Truman. Ry Cooder released a short album (nine tracks) called Election Special. Usual killer guitar and banjo work; as a musician Ry’s astonishing. As a singing agent provocateur, he’s goddamned great — and his track Guantanamo is wonderful.

    If I get my voice back before Sunday, I’ll be playing his “Take Your Hands Off It” on Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind on The Point starting this Sunday night.

    And you thought I was plugging Cooder…

  5. Neil C.
    August 6, 2012 - 12:35 pm

    Obama is an extremist candidates only to the insane right.

  6. Mike Gold
    August 6, 2012 - 1:27 pm

    Well, Neil, after all, putting maybe 20 million people on the health insurance roles while, at the same time, making the insurance industry a massive fortune IS pretty extreme.

  7. Pennie
    August 6, 2012 - 4:26 pm

    Ry rocks. Always has. Always will. Into the Purple Valley we go. Wheeeeeee!

  8. Pennie
    August 6, 2012 - 4:32 pm

    If Obama wanted deep penetration, he’d send Ry and Lindley out to stir the vote. Who is Mittens gonna summon? Donnie and Marie?

  9. Mike Gold
    August 6, 2012 - 6:12 pm

    Well, Clint Eastwood came out for Romney.

    But Ron Jeremy came out for Obama.

    And Romney wanted the Jewish vote…

  10. Rick Oliver
    August 7, 2012 - 9:02 am

    At this point, I hope one party wins the white house, the house and a super majority in the senate (at this point I’m almost beyond caring which one). And I hope they maintain their majorities through the mid-terms. Then they have four years to put up or shut up. Of course, the only problem with this scenario is there’s almost no way there will be any significant improvement in the economy even if whatever plan they put in place makes some kind of sense, which it won’t, because neither party is talking about the basic problem, which is that we don’t have much of an economy left to improve. Neither party is talking about the negative effect of all those free trade agreements. The latest round, cheerfully promoted by the white house, overwhelming passed both houses of congress. The only dissenters were Democrats (and Olympia Snowe), but there were damn few of them.

  11. R. Maheras
    August 7, 2012 - 10:03 am

    Yeah, verily. Sir Vinnie doth speaketh with great wisdom.

    Surrounded are we with pretenders, charlatans and fools!

    A hero is sorely needed, yet nary a one is in the offing.

    Woe unto us. Woe unto us…

  12. Mike Gold
    August 7, 2012 - 10:19 am

    What we Americans can’t get through our xenophobic little brains is that we live in a global economy. There’s nothing new about that. And here’s the funny part: our economy is doing a hell of a lot better than most of the rest of the world. The problem is, we gotta sell shit to them. Lots of shit. All kinds of shit. And right now and for the foreseeable future, they ain’t buying our shit.

    Add to this all the government jobs we’ve lost due to rampant Reaganism and even if Milton Friedman and Peter Drucker rise up from the grave to take over, we’re fucked for a long time to come.

    And giving the stupidly rich tons and tons of additional welfare ain’t gonna improve anything except ecstasy sales at the more trendy clubs.

  13. Rick Oliver
    August 7, 2012 - 11:27 am

    They ain’t buying our shit because we aren’t making any shit they need. All the shit we used to sell is now made someplace else. Free trade agreements theoretically work both ways, but in reality goods flow into the U.S. and money flows out. We only live in a global economy because we keep buying what the politicians are selling. In the very long term, free trade may benefit everyone (I have my doubts), but anyone who thinks that free trade will result in anything other than a drastic reduction in the standard of living for us for an extended period of time is delusional.

    You can compete against one dollar-per-hour wages two ways: Pay your employees one dollar an hour or replace them with machines. This is a lose-lose proposition for American workers.

    We don’t even have high-tech jobs that we can retrain them for because we outsourced all those jobs too. Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital success story is largely the story of buying and restructuring businesses that don’t actually make anything. Most of them are in the service (e.g., Burger King, Domino’s Pizza) and retail sectors (e.g., Burlington Coat Factory). Good luck rebuilding the economy on fast food and clothes made in the Phillippines.

  14. Rick Oliver
    August 7, 2012 - 11:31 am

    Of course, there is another way to compete against dollar-an-hour wages: Get rid of the free trade agreements (including NAFTA and CAFTA), and reinstate trade tariffs, and use what’s left of our buying power to influence labor practices in the countries that make all the shit we buy.

  15. Mike Gold
    August 7, 2012 - 12:12 pm

    We build IDEAS.

    The problem is, they build ideas too. And since they outscore us in math and science, they’re eating our lunch.

    Maybe Nero had the right idea after all.

  16. George Haberberger
    August 7, 2012 - 12:56 pm

    Completely off topic: As of a few days ago why doesn’t Michael Davis World show up in the widget box on Peter David’s blog the way it used to and ComicMix still does? I had to use Google to get here.

  17. R. Maheras
    August 7, 2012 - 1:38 pm

    C’mon, Mike, They’re buying plenty of our shit — $1.2 trillion of it last year. And if you look at the top US 10 exports, it’s stuff like civilian aircraft, semiconductors, cars, prescription drugs, automobile parts, industrial machinery, fuel oil, chemicals, telecommunications and plastics.

    And if you look at the top 25 fastest growing US exports, there’s nary a service industry in the lot.

    Methinks your theory still has some holes big enough for some Ice Road Truckers to drive through ’em.

  18. Mike Gold
    August 7, 2012 - 2:11 pm

    And tobacco, Russ. $1.2 trillion sounds like a lot of money — and I absolutely love typing the phrase “$1.2 trillion sounds like a lot of money” — but it’s not enough to grow the global economy (irrespective of domestic forces; that’s a different argument). If we get that amount in 2013, we’ll be doing pretty good, all things considered.

    We do have something of a manufacturing comeback, and that’s great and I hope it continues to pick up speed. Particularly the renewal of the American car racket. There’s lots of reasons for this — the government loans certainly helped save GM’s ass, and Ford showed more strategic thinking than the American auto biz has shown in 30 years. I hope it’s a role model.

    I can argue some of those holes, but Ice Road Truckers is the only “reality” show I watch and I’ve noticed not a single hole sucked up a single driver in any of the, what, six or seven seasons. It’s sort of like DC killing off Superman or Batman; you know it ain’t gonna happen. However, Hugh Rowland just might end up starving to death after these past two seasons.

    I really like Ice Road Truckers. And that’s aside of my affinity for Alaska and the Yukon.

  19. Rick Oliver
    August 7, 2012 - 2:27 pm

    Russ: Services tend not to be exportable, particularly those that fall in the “you have to be there to do it” category. That’s why there are still service jobs. Most exports tend to be tangible goods. And we may export plenty of shit, but we import a whole shitload more than we import. We’ve been running a negative trade balance since the early 90s, a negative balance that has gone steadily further into the red just about every year. (There was an anomalous uptick in the latter half of 2008, but then the downward trend resumed.

  20. Rick Oliver
    August 7, 2012 - 2:30 pm

    Oops. Meant to say “we import a whole shitload more than we export.”

    And here’s the source of the trade balance info:

    http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/balance-of-trade

  21. R. Maheras
    August 7, 2012 - 2:59 pm

    My point is that the situation is not hopeless. Sometimes I’m a “the glass is half full” kind of guy.

    If I were running the show, I’d be doing eveything in my power to help industry stay competitive.

  22. Mike Gold
    August 7, 2012 - 9:45 pm

    The glass is chipped. Watch where you put your lips.

    Industry is a cycle, and we have a bitch of a time keeping the loop looped. We need to be competitive, and we need to treat the workers fairly. That, in turn, will spur the economy as all those fair wages get either spent on product or banked and lent out for business expansion. As Detroit and Boeing both proved this past year, you can be more competitive by improving your product while treating your workers fairly. If you freeze wages and fire half the staff, the remaining employees will stick around and do twice the work — but who’s going to buy the product? And how long will they keep it up? How long can they keep it up and maintain quality?

    In industry, the music goes round and round. Stop the flow, squeeze the process and you bring industry to a stop. Return to the long-term gains model. Build for the future. Rebuild the middle class.

  23. Mike Gold
    August 7, 2012 - 9:47 pm

    Oh. And coo-coo-ca-joob. I AM the goddamned Walrus! So there.

  24. R. Maheras
    August 8, 2012 - 11:21 am

    Mike — I remember the days back in the 1970s when Detroit’s cars were crap compared to their foreign competition. Not any more. There are a whole bunch of US cars I’d buy now.

    If I had the dough, I’d by this car — same color — tomorrow in a frickin’ heartbeat:
    http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/production_2010_camaro_coupe_1280_-00_450op.jpg

  25. Mike Gold
    August 8, 2012 - 11:59 am

    I’ve always been able to find worthy US cars — I’ve never bought a foreign car, and of the maybe eight cars I’ve bought since 1970 (I lived in NYC for a couple years and didn’t have a car, nor did I bother to get one when I moved from there to Evanston until I decided I wanted to drive myself to Hackney’s), only one sucked — a Chrysler, and I haven’t bought that nameplate since. I’m driving a 2005 Ford Focus hatchback right now, I’ve got just over 100,000 miles on the sucker and take it to Chicago and Detroit maybe five times a year. I’ll drive anywhere north of Virginia and east of the Mississippi,and next year two friends and I are going to rent a Caddy and drive out to San Diego (and fly back, probably).

    I’d love to make the drive up the Alaska/Canada highway. Probably not in my 2005 Focus, although it gets swell mileage.

  26. R. Maheras
    August 8, 2012 - 2:37 pm

    Mike — Well, dang! Good for you!

    Lifetime, I’m about 50-50 when it comes to American vs. foreign cars, but those numbers are skewed because I lived overseas for 10 years and American vehicles were not an option.

    Our family car is five years old, so my wife is starting to look around for a new vehicle. Maybe I should slip her a Camaro brochure.

    😉

  27. Mike Gold
    August 8, 2012 - 7:32 pm

    My father learned how to drive when the family was living in Indianapolis. He became completely obsessed with buying American cars, and taught me these virtues as I was growing up. When he was in junior high school he hustled his way into a private tour of the Duisenberg plant on the pretext of doing a school report.

    After the war he was head of accounting for Warshawsky (JC Whitney), and even when good American cars were few and hard to find, he stressed to me that they were out there if you looked and the only way to get the industry back on its feet was to support the good stuff.

    Great lesson.

    He only changed his mind, when he was 89 about a year or so before he died. He thought that if American manufacturers weren’t smart enough to jump into the hybrid engine field, they deserved what they got. Let me stress he was not an ecology nut; he was into CARS THAT WORKED and technology that would get us to the 21st century. He was slightly disappointed when I couldn’t get a Prius without waiting 10 months — that’s when I bought the 2005 Focus, and he was glad I did… but sorry he never got to ride in a hybrid.

    In Illinois, real old folks have to get their license renewed every year; a smart law. Unfortunately, he spent his 90th birthday in an assisted living home in Detroit, where my mother still lives. I knew what cars meant to him, and when he couldn’t get his license renewed (and he knew he shouldn’t), it was all over for him. He died a month later.

  28. R. Maheras
    August 9, 2012 - 6:58 pm

    A sad story, Mike. My step-dad (who was actually the only father I ever knew) was a retired truck driver, and one day in his early 80s, he came back from a trip to the grocery store and told my mom someone backed into their car while he was inside. Shortly after that, he stopped driving, and my mom did the driving from then on. I know giving up that freedom ate at him immensely, but what else can you do when your body starts failing you?

Comments are closed.