Terrorism is As Terrorism Does? by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #323 | @MDWorld
April 22, 2013 Mike Gold 5 Comments
When the bombs went off last week, former George Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer gave an interview saying this wasn’t the time for partisan posturing, it was a time for coming together as Americans. I was impressed; Fleischer has been one of the more political posturers, and it was refreshing to see him do the right thing.
I mentioned this to daughter Adriane, who texted “Oh, then you didn’t see Fox.” Well, no, I didn’t. The idea of watching Roger Ailes’ cable version of Heckle and Jeckle ranks just behind taking high-strychnine LSD and setting my nostril hairs on fire. She said Fox reported 10 deaths and an arrest of a Saudi terrorist. They were off by, well, seven deaths (eight at the time) and one arrest.
Without bothering to confirm, Fox’s fortune-losing fish-wrap sister The New York Post put it in print for those few of the Rapid Right who know how to read. This was a few days before they put a photo of two people, one wearing a white cap, both carrying backpacks, on their front page next to the headline: Bag Men – Feds Seek These Two Pictured At Boston Marathon. Two innocent people who were absolutely and totally not the two feds were seeking. So, no, I don’t pay attention to Rupert Murdoch’s lies and incompetence. Others make mistakes; Murdoch’s news empire maintains a reckless disdain for the truth and ethical reporting.
Having lost the timing argument, I speculated as to how the Rabid Right would try to turn this horror to their advantage, certain that they would try. On his worst day, Ari Fleischer is no Roger Ailes. This came several hours later, when the Rabid Right (and I apologize for choosing alliteration over redundancy) started taking President Obama to task for not using the word “terrorist” in his comments made at 6 PM Monday evening.
For the moment, let us put aside the absolute reality that you could call the whole event a strawberry malt and that wouldn’t change a damn thing. The Rabid Right will not be denied the opportunity to make asses of themselves at the ugliest possible time.
Obama – and he said as much in his comments – took a more methodical approach, encouraging a careful ad more efficacious approach in the investigations. Heaven forbid we should go out and invade Iraq again. But that wasn’t good enough for the Rapid Right. They demanded to know why Obama didn’t call them terrorists immediately. They wanted to know what he was hiding and why he was so incompetent for not calling a spade a spade.
What Obama was hiding was obvious. One of the winners of this year’s Boston Marathon was from Kenya.
But the Rabid Right promotes an overreaching question: What is an act of terrorism? If it is to inspire terror, then the guy who sticks a gun in your face and says “your money or your life” is a terrorist. If we define terrorism as having an international component – and let us remember “Islam” isn’t a nation, it’s a religion – then Timothy McVeigh, Jim David Adkisson and Professor Ted Kaczynski (to name but a few) are not terrorists.
The Boston Marathon bombings were an act of terrorism and were referred to as such by all but law and government officials from the outset, but generally speaking that term wasn’t tossed around nearby Newtown Connecticut. Adam Lanza killed 26 people in an act that terrified the nation, particularly teachers, school children and their parents. If Adam wasn’t a terrorist, then if the Boston Bombers were Americans who used an assault rifle and 30 round magazines instead of ball-bearing packed pressure cookers, should they beat the terrorist rap? And, indeed, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev became an American citizen – ironically – on September 11, 2012.
If we use the term “terrorist” to mean a person who, through an act of violence and murder, inspires terror… then I’m not certain the Boston Bombers was were terrorists per se. I don’t see America being more terrorized by the Marathon bombings. I see America being more pissed, and I see Americans more inspired to help.
Either way, I’m sure the gaggle of the Rapid Right fools will continue to do what they do best: babble incredible lies about President Blackguy Omuslim over and over until they get a teensy-tiny bit of traction from a handful of imbecilic no-lives, thereby upping their Q-ratings all the way up to 2.
But I’ll tell you one thing: Obama not calling the Boston Bombers terrorists was a hell of a lot better than Rupert Murdoch callously reporting a phony arrest, a death count more than three times higher than reality, and identifying two innocents as bombing suspects.
Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com, every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week – check the website above for times. Gold also joins MDW’s Marc Alan Fishman, Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color. And Gold joins ComicMixers Marc Alan Fishman, Glenn Hauman and Adriane Nash at the massive C2E2 convention in Chicago this weekend; join us at Booth 1237 and, please, bring chocolate covered cake donuts.
R. Maheras
April 22, 2013 - 9:22 am
Sigh.
You take Fox and the NY Post to task but don’t mention the lefty/center-lefty news outlets that did the same thing and were publicly criticized by the FBI: CNN, The Boston Globe, The Associated Press, and several Boston TV stations.
As The Hollywood Reporter pointed out, “Such mistakes are nothing new in journalism, of course. The 2000 presidential election, the 1996 Atlanta Olympic bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City attack remain watershed moments for the news media in which serious mistakes were made in how they were covered. But the age of the instant Twitter update may have ramped up the rate of error with a string of faulty reports during more recent breaking news situations.
“Multiple media outlets misidentified the shooter in the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Conn., and also said the suspect’s mother was killed at the school. CNN and Fox News misreported the Supreme Court’s January decision on President Obama’s health care overhaul. ABC News correspondent Brian Ross erroneously linked Aurora, Colo., shooter James Holmes to the Tea Party. And early reports about the January 2011 Tucson, Ariz., shooting involving U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords said the congresswoman had died.”
And while The New York Times, NBC and MSNBC noted (no doubt gleefully) that they made no major errors regarding the suspect apprehensions for the Boston Marathon Bomber story, they have plenty of other recent gaffes and stupid errors in their column that would be equal to, or greater than those of Fox News.
Yet “Faux News” is the only guilty party?
Double sigh!
To quote two of my favs, Boers and Bernstein, on Chicago’s 670 The Score radio, “Who Ya Crappin’?”
However, I’ll concede that the NY Post is in a class all by itself. Reading the Post is like living in England in the early 1980s and reading the British tabloids. The only thing missing is the Page 3 pin-up girl.
Doug Abramson
April 22, 2013 - 4:22 pm
As soon as Obama finished speaking, I said “He didn’t use the T word, Fox is gonna have a field day”. Just once it would be nice for those idiots to not live down to expectations. The Chicken Little impressions that the politicians are doing because to twits with unusual names went off the deep end is embarrassing. They were terrorists and murderers, but one’s dead and the other one is in custody. Its over until the trial. Move on, nothing to see here. The sad thing is, they didn’t even manage to kill or maim the most Americans for the week. The industrial accident in West, Texas was a much larger explosion that killed and injured many more people than in Boston and cause a lot more property damage. That story barely warranted coverage and the media and politicians moved on quickly. Boston is still the top story. What makes two twits on a spree more important than the deaths caused by morons running a factory? Shouldn’t the dead and injured in Texas get as much attention as those in Boston?
Pennie
April 22, 2013 - 5:21 pm
Okay,I’ll go…who are the brain police?
Call any vegetable.
Rick Oliver
April 22, 2013 - 5:48 pm
24-hour news cycles are inevitably filled with…well… filler. They make wild speculations to fill dead air and latch on to every rumor as “news”. If someone had Photoshopped a picture of Big Foot lurking in the crowd at the marathon, some news outlet probably would have run with it.
I’m actually more concerned that no one seemed concerned that Boston was practically under martial law while they hunted for the perps.
R. Maheras
April 22, 2013 - 6:52 pm
Doug — According to my Journalism 101 class, yes, the Texas story should technically have carried more weight. But the Boston story is more of a “dog bites man” story, and while it was unfolding, no one knew when the killing was going to end. The fact is, we were lucky that a.) The bombers opted not to kill the guy they carjacked, and b.) the carjacked guy (inadvertantly?) left his cell phone in his car, which made it traceable for the cops. Otherwise, those guys may have kept on killing.
Doug Abramson
April 22, 2013 - 7:06 pm
Rick,
I raised an eyebrow when I heard about it on Friday; but I think that the key word is practically. Apparently, as long as you didn’t need to use public transportation or wanted into or out of the police cordon in Watertown, you were OK to move around. Most people decided that staying indoors sounded like a good idea.
Neil C.
April 22, 2013 - 10:29 pm
Russ, can you ever admit that one of the right-wing media outlets without bring up the “Look, those nasty lefties do it, too!” It’s OK to admit your side made errors without protecting your manhood by castigating the other size. I am quite capable of admitting that CNN screwed up big-time on its coverage.
George Haberberger
April 23, 2013 - 5:34 am
Doug,
“What makes two twits on a spree more important than the deaths caused by morons running a factory? Shouldn’t the dead and injured in Texas get as much attention as those in Boston?”
Assuming this is a serious question, the answer is obvious. The explosion in Texas was, in your own words, an industrial accident. The death toll is higher but the impact to our society is not greater than the actions of two twits who purposely seek to terrorize and disrupt our entire society.
Neil,
Russ is justified in pointing out that the left does it too because, at least on this board, it is not likely that that point would be made. He didn’t mention the NPR report that postulated the Boston bomber was likely a right-wing extremist because it was close to Hitler’s birthday and the anniversary of the Columbine school attack. I emailed NPR about that bit of reckless and prejudicial “reporting”. Got a form letter back instructing me on how to contribute to public broadcasting.
Doug Abramson
April 23, 2013 - 5:46 am
George,
An act of terror only impacts people as much as they let it. On some level,all terrorists do what they do for attention; for either themselves or their “cause”. Focusing on Boston and almost ignoring West gives the bombers what they want. You better believe my question was serious. Americans were killed and injured in both cases. In Texas, some lost their homes. What they’re going through isn’t any less important or newsworthy because it was only an industrial accident.
Doug Abramson
April 23, 2013 - 5:47 am
George,
An act of terror only impacts a nation as much as they let it. On some level,all terrorists do what they do for attention; for either themselves or their “cause”. Focusing on Boston and almost ignoring West gives the bombers what they want. You better believe my question was serious. Americans were killed and injured in both cases. In Texas, some lost their homes. What they’re going through isn’t any less important or newsworthy because it was only an industrial accident.
R. Maheras
April 23, 2013 - 7:15 am
Neil — My point is that Fox is no better or worse then many other media outlets.
Every single media outlet has a political slant, and taking Fox to task because they are allegedly “over-the-top” biased and/or incompetent is horseshit.
“The New York Times” is at least as biased to the left as Fox is to the right, but the only reason I’ll give them the nod professionally over Fox is because I believe that overall, print journalism has a better accuracy track record, historically, than does television journalism.
But accuracy does not unbiased make, as I pointed out in my essay a couple of years ago, “The ‘Myth’ of Media Bias.”
Facts can be selectively positioned, framed, or omitted outright if the new source is biased. In the case of Fox, everyone knows they have a conservative slant. But I don’t know how many times I’ve had liberals argue that “The New York Times” does not have a liberal slant. And I’m sure many on the staff of the “Times” would also argue they aren’t a liberal-leaning rag. But if you look at the way they report and slant the news for a given story, it’s really quite obvious.
Which is why I take exception to any claim that Fox is somehow “less legitimate” than other news outlets.
That’s simply liberal spin.
Rene
April 23, 2013 - 11:47 am
Muggers aren’
Rene
April 23, 2013 - 11:50 am
Oops.
I meant, muggers aren’t terrorists, because they lack a political objective.
Rick Oliver
April 23, 2013 - 9:43 pm
“The death toll is higher but the impact to our society is not greater than the actions of two twits who purposely seek to terrorize and disrupt our entire society.”
Right. Lack of zoning laws and absence of safety inspections have no impact on our entire society. Every state should be more like Texas, and their governor was in Illinois this week inviting businesses to come on down!
Neil C.
April 23, 2013 - 10:59 pm
And Texas, which wants money from that evil Federal government after saying they wanted to secede and the East Coast shouldn’t get anything for Sandy.
George Haberberger
April 24, 2013 - 3:11 pm
Lack of zoning laws or not, people have less reason to find themselves at a fertilizer plant than a popular mass gathering, or soft target, as authorities refer to places with unsuspecting innocents. Fertilizer plants are not soft targets.
Doug’s originally asked why the Texas explosion received so little coverage relative to the Boston bombing and your attitude about Texas may be his answer. It was in Texas and the national media is not in Texas. It could be said that the national media harbors an animus toward Texas and their governor. “Superstorm” Sandy was a Category 1 hurricane when it hit the east coast, yet because New York City is a media hub, its importance was incalculable. Joplin Missouri was hit with a F5 tornado, (the most powerful classification), in May 2011 and the town had entire neighborhoods flattened and 189 people died. Superstorm Sandy, in a part of the US where population is a bit more dense, killed 131 people.
Doug Abramson
April 24, 2013 - 11:41 pm
OK, can someone tell me why I’m just now seeing Russ’ posts from the last two days? They just wound up in my in box within the last hour and they weren’t showing up on the post earlier either.
Thanks Russ, but the “why” in my first post was semi- rhetorical. The “if it bleeds, it leads” crap is my number one complaint about all media outlets. I can even accept your explanation (although media outlets should be able to cover more than one story at a time); but by Sunday new developments in the Boston story had temporarily stopped. That gave the media a chance to catch up on the Texas story. Instead, they decided to recycle old information from Boston. Its enough to drive a man to drink.
Neil C.
April 25, 2013 - 7:55 am
George,
Then Texas doesn’t need any money from a government it despises.
Rene
April 25, 2013 - 9:45 am
The more I read about it, the more it looks like the two brothers are more like the Columbine killers than Al-Qaida operatives.
I am puzzled by Republicans’ insistence that the remaining brother be considered an “Enemy Combatant”. Mike was right, this is not terrorism, as it seems there were no international connections, no political statements, just two amateurs.
There is that deadly zone roughly between 15-30 years old in that most males feel the urge to leave their mark on the world, to prove their manhood. And when they’re middle-class, alienated, directionless, and lacking in empathy, then terrible things can happen.
I don’t think Islam is to blame this time, no more than violent videogames were in Columbine. It was just the little spark that ignited the raging fire of the older brother’s “Manhood Madness”.
But it’s very telling that Conservatives want to talk about Islam and immigration and terrorism at this time. Their response is just plain wrong. Is it racism that make this different for them than what Adam Lanza did? Or is it that murder = crazy loner, while murder + anti-americanism = terrorist?
Is that a form of thought crime, then? If you just kill people, then you’re tried as a citizen, but if you kill people while thinking anti-American thoughts, then you lose any legal protections and is an enemy combatant?
I’m happy that the GOP is away from the White House at this moment.
R. Maheras
April 25, 2013 - 2:03 pm
Why is it that liberals are adamantly against labeling Muslim radicals a special class of bad via “enemy combatants,” yet they are fervent advocates of labeling neo-nazis or homophobes a special kind of bad via “hate crimes.”
If liberals and conservates truly believe “the law is the law” then their shouldn’t be any special category of bad.
I’m just sayin’…
Neil C.
April 25, 2013 - 11:16 pm
Yes, because conservatives never label anyone….
Rene
April 26, 2013 - 4:58 am
I agree with Russ on that one.
But there is one slight difference between liberals and conservatives in that. What defines a “hate crime” is primarily the identity of the victim. What defines an “enemy combatant” is the identity of the killer.
Liberals go overboard to protect a minority. Conservatives go overboard to punish a minority.
I still would rather be a liberal.
But hell, premeditated murder is premeditated murder. I don’t think the ethnic background, religion or sexual orientation of the victim or of the murderer should matter all that much. Death is the great equalizer.
George Haberberger
April 26, 2013 - 6:27 am
Neil, allow me to refer you to your post on the 22nd:
“Russ, can you ever admit that one of the right-wing media outlets without bring up the “Look, those nasty lefties do it, too!”
Doesn’t that kind of sound like: “Yes, because conservatives never label anyone….”
R. Maheras
April 26, 2013 - 12:45 pm
George – Touche!
Neil C.
April 26, 2013 - 1:19 pm
Wow, George, you are so clever!
George Haberberger
April 29, 2013 - 1:52 pm
“Wow, George, you are so clever!”
What? You MEANT to post something that contradicted an earlier post?
Neil C.
April 29, 2013 - 3:03 pm
George, Hope you are as through at your job as you are at going through every statement for gotcha! It’s time for you to assert your manhood and get the last word….
George Haberberger
April 29, 2013 - 7:31 pm
I see what you did there. And yes, I am very thorough at my job, but this is just a hobby.
Neil C.
April 29, 2013 - 9:51 pm
And if you have any level of reading comprehension, I never claimed that I didn’t ‘do things like that;’ I just said you and Russ are masters at seeing everything right wing as correct.
George Haberberger
April 30, 2013 - 5:13 am
“I see what you did there.” referred to your tactic of obliging me to either not respond or respond as though I am doing what you predicted. It had nothing to do with implying that I said you “didn’t do things like that.” Another sign was using “through” instead of “thorough”, which seemed to be bait for a response. Maybe I am over-thinking this. Part of my job is being a proofreader.
I can’t speak for Russ, but I suspect he would agree, that we don’t see EVERYTHING right wing as correct.
Rene
April 30, 2013 - 8:13 am
True.
99,99% isn’t everything.