MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

They Shot Five Congressmen, by Mike Gold – Brainiac on Banjo #324 | @MDWorld

April 29, 2013 Mike Gold 1 Comment

Brainiac Art 32459 years ago, four men and women came to Washington DC and shot five Congressmen on the House floor. It’s possible you haven’t heard of this one; I’ve been surprising people with this story for a long, long time.

On March 1, 1954, in an attempt to illuminate the world on the horrors of American imperialism, four Puerto Rican nationalists came to Washington armed to the teeth, got themselves seats in the visitors’ balcony (referred to as the Ladies’ Gallery) and, at the moment they deemed appropriate, unfurled a Puerto Rican flag, whipped out their semi-automatic pistols and got off 30 rounds, wounded five Congressmen – one seriously but none fatally. They did not have to be burdened with gun laws or checkpoints, and they were not shot down by schoolteachers where they stood.

Amusingly, at the time Congress was debating the pros and cons of a new immigration bill. I live for irony.

They were arrested and convicted in Federal court and given 76 years at various government resorts, including Leavenworth and Alcatraz. Twenty-five years later they were pardoned by President Jimmy Carter and were returned to Puerto Rico, reportedly as part of a deal with Fidel Castro in trade for a bunch of our spies.

Obviously, the shooters failed to make their point. Even if you were aware of this event, it’s now almost 60 years later and not only are most people unaware of the day Congress was shot up, but Puerto Rico remains American property.

In all my reading of newspaper accounts published at the time, at no point was the word “terrorist” used.

Come to think of it, nine years later a man purportedly (“innocent until proven guilty in a court of law” and, being dead, he was neither tried nor convicted) wounded a United States governor and killed the United States president. He was not referred to as a terrorist in the newspapers at the time.

I’m sure both incidents would be perceived in such a manner today. Back in 1954 Congress responded by tightening security but nothing else of substance was done. Even the JFK assassination was met with little more than lengthy jawboning. No draconian measures were taken, and we survived under the cloak of sanity and the American principles of fair play for all. Mostly.

As individuals, our liberties were not threatened. Our right to habeas corpus was maintained. We didn’t ship untried Puerto Ricans off to internment camps. We could take our favorite shampoo on the airplane. We didn’t have to take off our shoes.

In other to get to that point, we had to redefine a label so that we could use to promote and maintain a continuous state of paranoia.

Let us remember that the folks in Boston, the people who spotted the suspects, the folks who whipped out their cellphone cameras, the various police agencies that conducted a reasonable and highly effective investigation, the marathoners who ran 26 miles and then immediately gave blood, the folks at New York’s Penn Station who didn’t utter a peep when their Boston-bound trains were terminated and they were tossed into a busy and often confusing city… let us remember that these people and so many more did not react out of paranoia. Anger, yes. Support for their fellow human being, to be sure. Terror… not so much. And paranoia… not at all.

Because if you’re paranoid – no matter how justifiably so – you can’t do squat.

Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com, every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week – check the website above for times. Gold also joins MDW’s Marc Alan Fishman, Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Doug Abramson
    April 29, 2013 - 11:11 am

    We also didn’t turn Pennsylvania Ave into a DMZ when members of the same separatist group tried to assassinate Truman in front of Blair House.

  2. R. Maheras
    May 1, 2013 - 7:23 am

    You wouldn’t have surprised me. I was born in 1954, so when I picked up a vintage 1954 “Year in Review” book about 20-30 years ago, I read about it.

    The reason no one called them “terrorists” is because that terminology wasn’t in the vernacular of the average person back then. During the 1950s one might hear terms like anarchists, separatists, resistance fighters, guerrillas, communists and bomb-throwers, but not terrorists (or insurgents, for that matter).

    And the reason that case was different than cases today, is back in 1954, niceties like Miranda Rights didn’t exist, so it was much harder for folks like those Puerto Rican Nationalists to get off on legal technicalities than it is today.

    Mike, if you live for irony, read how Ernesto Miranda’s alleged bar-fight killer in 1976 exercised his Miranda rights and was released without being charged

  3. Rick Oliver
    May 2, 2013 - 9:50 am

    Yeah! Screw the 5th, 6th, and 8th amendments! They’re so darned inconvenient now that we’re perpetually at war with an undefined enemy.

  4. Rene
    May 2, 2013 - 12:15 pm

    For good or for ill, people consider politicians and public persons to be in the line of fire, so to speak. The JFK murder may have shocked and angered people, but it takes the killing of ordinary people for real terrorism. And 9/11 was unprecendented in the number of civilians murdered.

    I’m not saying this to defend Bush and co. I believe Al Gore would probably have pursued restricted police action to get Bin Laden, and not used 9/11 as an excuse to go play geopolitical chess in the Middle East and reignite the Culture War. It’s not for nothing that Bush is reviled by anyone not American and not hardcore Republican.

    But the Democrats have not had the balls to turn a new leaf and get rid of the Patriot Act and Gitmo either. And Bush would not have been able to get away with as much as he did without the Dems complicity.

    Both Parties are to blame. It’s profitable for the GOP to keep the War on Terror hot, because it’s almost the only issue they have that most Americans are sympathetic to. And the Dems probably are still afraid of looking “weak” (despite Obama having a much better record of getting the bad guys than Bush).

Comments are closed.