The NRA and Sheriff Bart, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #325 | @MDWorld
May 6, 2013 Mike Gold 3 Comments
According to a poll taken last week by CBS/New York Times – well past the “heat of the moment” generated from the Newtown Massacre – 88% of the American public are in favor of sanctions that would limit the gun-buying capabilities of terrorists, criminals, and the insane.
88% of the American people. That’s higher than, say, “should we continue to prevent starving grandmothers from receiving free life-saving health care?” Higher than “do you think we landed on the moon?” or “did the holocaust really happen?” Higher than “where do you want to go for lunch?”
Last week a gun owner armed with a 40-calliber semi-automatic pistol, a loaded AR-15 rifle and a Gideon Bible shot up the Houston Texas airport, killing himself and an innocent. Immediately thereafter, the National Rifle Association held a big old party in that very same town that attracted 80,000 gun nuts for a celebration of their anti-American victory in preventing these sanctions from becoming law.
If you asked me to name five people who are too dangerous to own guns, I would probably say something like Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh, Ted Bundy, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and NRA Chief Executive Officer Wayne LaPierre. Only one of this evil gaggle remains alive. When it comes to death counts, this survivor has responsibility for the largest.
Wayne sure knows how to rouse the rabble. “How many Bostonians wished they had a gun two weeks ago?” he asked his conventioneers. Evidently, Wayne believes the Boston death count wasn’t high enough.
LaPierre excels at promoting to the ignorance of his membership. They are convinced these sanctions are in violation of the Second Amendment, proving these folks either do not know how to read or have a reading comprehension testing of an in-bred preschooler. They believe that the government is out to confiscate their guns, as if such a thing was a logistical possibility, as if our military would follow such an order.
According to Fairleigh Dickinson University’s PublicMind, 44% of Republicans, 18% of Democrats and 27% of independents responded in agreement with the concept that an armed revolution against the American government might be needed in the next few years. They believe that such an insurrection could be accomplished by paranoid lunatics taking their guns and shooting down drones and shooting up tanks.
“You know,” as The Waco Kid said to Sheriff Bart, “morons.”
Did you know that in 1792 the very same people who wrote the Second Amendment also established a national gun registry?
The Ridiculous Right loves to wrap themselves in the cape of Americanism. They do not know what it is to be an American. They cherry-pick our history and our laws, they misinterpret in order to meet the needs of their paranoid fantasies, and they outright lie. They are anti-egalitarian, anti-democracy, and pro-death. Their interpretation of “Ubi Est Mia” embraces what the old lady told Sheriff Bart: “up yours, nigger.”
The Right is, in thought and in deed, anti-American. They do not deserve unfettered access to guns, and they certainly can not be trusted with them.
Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com, every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week – check the website above for times. Gold also joins MDW’s Marc Alan Fishman, Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.
R. Maheas
May 6, 2013 - 12:18 pm
Yet, according to the latest Gallup poll, only four percent of Americans think the issue of gun control is important:
“Only 4 percent of Americans think guns and gun control are an important problem facing the country, according to Gallup, and far more Americans are concerned about the economy, unemployment and the federal debt.”
Go figure…
Rene
May 6, 2013 - 2:41 pm
Gun control is one of those things that only deeply ideological people are strongly worried about. Or people that have had loved ones killed by gun violence. That 4% sounds about right.
And that is why it’s so hard in the US to get stronger gun control measures in place, despite the desire of the overwhelming majority for such measures. It’s a majority that is only weakly commited, while Wayne LaPierre and his nutballs are very, very, very commited to the opposite agenda.
Rick Oliver
May 7, 2013 - 1:48 pm
Everybody is in favor of gun control for groups that aren’t like them, just like they’re all in favor of smaller government as long as it doesn’t affect any programs from which they directly benefit. 48% of Americans believe the Earth is less than 10,000 years old. If they get another 2.1%, should we pass a national law to change all the science text books?
This is not to say I don’t think we should have a rational debate about sensible gun control. The most interesting thing about the 80+% statistic is how little effect it had on our elected officials in Washington. Given the way the Senate is elected and the Senate voting rules, it’s theoretically possible that senators representing less than 11% of the total population can ignore the wishes of 89% of the electorate — and keep on getting elected by the not quite 11% who agree with them.
Rene
May 7, 2013 - 2:56 pm
I see that a lot in the abortion debate: “my abortion was a special circumstance that was totally justifiable, but your abortion is immoral”, and considering the number of abortions vis a vis the number of religious people opposed to abortion, I have a hard time thinking all those women having abortions (and their male partners) were atheists.
And of course, the austerity/free market people aren’t above the government helping THEM. “Capitalism for the suckers, socialism for me.”
But for gun control, I’m less sure. Lots of gun nuts don’t like to discuss gun control even for elements they usually have little use for, like non-whites and non-Christians. I do believe they’re honest in their craziness.
R. Maheras
May 7, 2013 - 10:06 pm
Unmentioned by anyone here is the fact that just a little over a year ago, in October 2011, Gallup’s historic trend showed that those supporting stricter gun laws was at an all-time low across the board for all key sub-groups.
The headline for the Gallup piece, which you can Google, is “Record-Low 26% in U.S. Favor Handgun Ban.” Don’t be misled by the “Handgun” part of the headline, as the article discusses other gun-related poll information as well.
In actuality, all of this recent teeth-gnashing and post-Newtown poll citing by the anti-gun crowd is very, very selective and misleading. It was simply political opportunism, because the bill that was defeated, had it been law, would have done little, if anything, to prevent that tragedy.
Despite the fact that, personally, I’m not anti-background checks, I’m glad clearer heads prevailed.
R. Maheras
May 7, 2013 - 10:25 pm
More bad news for the anti-gun crowd, hot off the AP wires:
“Gun homicides have dropped steeply in the United States since their peak in 1993, a pair of reports released Tuesday showed, adding fuel to Congress’ battle over whether to tighten restrictions on firearms.
A study released Tuesday by the government’s Bureau of Justice Statistics found that gun-related homicides dropped from 18,253 in 1993 to 11,101 in 2011. That’s a 39 percent reduction.”
Yeah… that’s right… a 39 percent reduction.
But facts doesn’t matter to the anti-gun crowd. They still think they are in the right, and will ignore the inconvenient truths that challenge THEIR paradigms.
Rick Oliver
May 10, 2013 - 7:19 am
Automobile accident deaths are trending downward; so let’s not do anything to make cars safer. BTW: Gun suicide rates are not declining, and keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally unstable is one of the issues on the table.
And I’m one of those people not in favor of “bans” on guns. I’m in favor of reasonable regulation of guns — and to save you time, the supreme court has not yet bothered to elaborate on what constitutes reasonable regulation.
Neil C.
May 10, 2013 - 1:12 pm
Come on, Rick. Any regulation on guns means they’re trying to take them all away. There is no such thing as moderation any more. And if you think differently, the black helicopters and drones will come to shut you up.