MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Sporting Life, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld

August 17, 2013 Martha Thomases 8 Comments

Carlos-SmithThere is a feverish debate raging over the 2014 Winter Olympic games, scheduled to start early next year in Russia.  There are a variety of reasons for this (including Putin’s recent decision to allow Edward Snowden to leave the Moscow airport), but the main argument is over Russia’s recent draconian laws against gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, transgendered and other queer people.  The debate is almost entirely on the left, since the right in this country has a position similar to the Russian leader’s.

There are intelligent arguments to be made on both sides of the question as to whether or not to boycott.  On the one hand, why should our money (for broadcast rights, tourism, etc.) support a regime that denies its people basic human rights?  Why should LGBT athletes risk jail for the chance to get a medal?

On the other hand, there are those, such as our President, who think the best way to protest Russia’s laws is for LGBT athletes and their allies to compete in the games and proudly win, as Jesse Owens did in 1936.

I like a protest with symbolism, the possibility that an image will ripple through the public’s consciousness.  Jesse Owens, African American, winning a gold medal in Hitler’s Aryan Germany was a powerful event.  For better or worse, LGBT people are not as visually distinctive from straight people.  Any photo op that would be useful would require the winners to identify themselves, either by speaking or wearing something that shows who they are.

 

 

 

 

And the law in Russia considers that to be a crime.  Apparently, so does the Olympic Committee.

In other words, the IOC is no better than Vladmir Putin in the way it values and protects LGBT people.

Now, I’m not that much of a sports fan.  I watch very little of the Olympics, and never with the sound on, because I find the talking heads to be maddening.  If you enjoy it, I’m happy for you.  When I’m with friends who want to watch, I pull out my knitting, because that’s the sociable thing to do.   I can boycott this Olympics with no problem whatsoever, just as I can boycott Russian vodka, and borscht, if it comes to that.

But …

I wasn’t around in 1936, but I remember 1968.  I remember how two men electrified a nation — a world — with a simple gesture of solidarity.  It’s an image that even now, 45 years later, gives me goosebumps.

LGBT people deserve the opportunity to make a similar statement to Putin, to the world.  If the Olympic Committee won’t allow it, perhaps the Olympics Committee deserves a boycott.

Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, swears she wasn’t drinking Russian vodka when she found this, and, in fact, finds it a reasonable substitute.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Mike Gold
    August 17, 2013 - 8:19 am

    The IOC has a long tradition of bigotry and hate. America Firster Avery Brundage, their president from 1952 to 1972, made appeasing Hitler fashionable years before “there will be peace in our time.” He strongly supported America’s participation in the Berlin Olympics in 1936 and actually wrote a fundraising program around the fact that Jews were opposed to this massive glorification of Hitler.

    Brundage made some highly pro-Nazi speeches at the fabled German-American Bund meeting at Madision Square Garden in 1938. He also made the decision not to end the 1972 Olympics after eight Palestinian terrorists slaughtered 11 Israeli athletes and coaches, as well as a West German police officer. The 1972 games marked the return of Olympics to Germany after the 1936 frivolities.

    The Olympics are supposed to be “above” global politics. Then again, the Olympics are supposed to be about naked men wrestling in competition — something that does not sit well with the Russians today.

    As for the winter games, I’ll be enthusiastically watching hockey and supporting the American team. But if we pulled out in protest of Russian homophobia, that wouldn’t bother me one bit.

  2. Pennie
    August 17, 2013 - 3:53 pm

    Do queer athletes risk arrest if they wave rainbow insignias on a winning podium? Hell yeah if the Ruskies choose to impose their martial law. They’ve been snuffing Pride Marches in Mother Russia for a while now. Putin could care less about world opinion. Even that bastion of free-thinking and democracy–Albania–passed pro-TLGB laws!
    Good column sweetie! You rock as ever.

  3. Doug Abramson
    August 17, 2013 - 11:53 pm

    The Czar…I mean President Putin has made it clear that he’ll sick “law enforcement”, I’m paraphrasing, on any athlete that they even think is “acting gay”. Giving western athletes fair warning that if they come for the Winter Olympics, they are to be seen competing, only. Any effective pro-gay demonstrations, at the games, are now too risky to attempt. Government backed boycotts are a waste of time. Does anybody think that President Carter’s ban on American participation in the 1980 Moscow games accomplished anything? The Soviet payback in 1984 only came off as petty. Politically and PR wise, I can’t see a boycott of the upcoming games faring any better; and given Putin’s tendency to be a reactionary, it could make thing much worse. I do think that a sports and cultural boycott of Russia would send a very strong message. If all of the athletes and performers who are scheduled to be at the Winter Games just didn’t show up, the embarrassment to Moscow, lacking a political player to lash out at, might cause the anti-gay campaign to be toned down; of not abandoned. This would cause the participants to waste years of hard work and in some cases a lot of money; but an “official” boycott would do the same thing. If enough of the participants forfeit going to the games and whatever individual payoffs they have been looking forward to; it would send a much louder and stronger message than anything the politicians could mount. Given just how much of a sacrifice it would be, I don’t expect to see it happen; but its something to think about.

  4. Rene
    August 18, 2013 - 6:22 am

    I am pessimistic about it. I wonder whether botcotts and other big gestures help at all. Conservatives have become adept at playing the victim card. If many countries boycott Russia, they will say the gay “lobby” is “powerful” and that they’re the ones being persecuted. The anti-gay bigots will frock to them all the more. The anti-gay campaign might very well be strenghtened.

    I have read a lot about parapsychology in the last couple of days, and one quote about the conservadorism of the scientific institutions applies very well to this situation too: “Scientific revolutions don’t happen overnight, they happen one funeral at at time.” I think it’s a small consolation, but nonetheless a consolation, that younger generations are less prejudiced. The bigots will vanish, one funeral at a time.

  5. Whitney
    August 18, 2013 - 9:23 am

    Heard some commentary recently about the IOC choosing to not acknowledge the murders of the Israeli athletes in the London Games last year. I was out of country without media access at the time, so this slipped by me.

    That made a statement, and a repulsive one in my accounting.

    To say that the Olympics are above politics is convenient when you are someone trying to get away with doing something wrong.

    It’s like saying that you aren’t a role model to children just because you aren’t their parents.

    If you get the perks of being on stage in the public eye, the responsibilities are irrevocable.

  6. Vinnie Bartilucci
    August 19, 2013 - 12:07 pm

    “scheduled to start early next year in Russia”

    I was under the impression nothing started early in Russia.

  7. Leonard
    August 19, 2013 - 1:32 pm

    Avery Brundage remains as one of the most loathsome of all Olympic officials. He was directly responsible for keeping Marty Glickman form running the 100 yard dash and Sam Stoller and Glickman from running in the 400 yard relay. He was a despicable piece of trash and I hope the upcoming HBO bio of Glickman brings that info to those too young to remember it.

    As to Sochi I think I like Greg Louganis’ take on it.
    He opposes the boycott basically because it will deny gay athletes the right to excell on a world stage.

    Great article MT

  8. Martha Tomases
    August 20, 2013 - 1:51 pm

    Thanks, Lenny. Welcome to the sandbox.

Comments are closed.