Going To Pot, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #353 | @MDWorld
January 6, 2014 Mike Gold 3 Comments
I was giving a deposition a couple decades ago – four days wasted on a race in which I no longer had a horse. This means I was taken away from more valuable things, like my job, and I was annoyed. I adopted two ways to express my displeasure: first, I had the subpoenaing party fly me out first class and put me up in a really terrific hotel. Second, I toyed with their attorney.
Kids, you might not want to try this at home. I’m an experienced deposition-giver, I’ve been around the courtroom block several times, and for better and worse I’ve worked with enough lawyers to give Shakespeare a coronary. Oh, I can be one erudite prick when I want to be, a superpower I now use only for good. An attorney once compared me to Mike Singletary, which was a high compliment indeed.
There’s a part in most depositions where at least one of the lawyers will go over your professional background in order to undermine your credibility. One of the attorneys seized upon my background as an executive in the drug abuse prevention field and contrasted that with some of my writings about legalization. I discovered my inquisitor was a member of MADD – Mothers Against Drunk Driving, a worthy cause. So I asked her the following question. “A driver runs over a kid and kills her. Which is worse: his being under the influence of alcohol, of illegal drugs, of anti-histamines, or of properly taken prescription depressants?”
Her answer was that it didn’t matter, dead is dead. So I replied, “I focus on punishing the action that causes harm, and I do not parse out which catalysts are evil and which are acceptable. It’s DWI that is unacceptable; it doesn’t matter how you define the ‘I.’”
That pretty much encapsulates my attitude towards substance abuse. The government has a proper role in educating people as to the effects of such behavior, but it should not be spending billions of tax dollars each year ruining peoples’ lives just because they chose the “wrong” mind-altering experience.
The folks of Colorado understand this with remarkable clarity. Last week, possession and use of small amounts of marijuana became legal, but if they catch you operating a motor vehicle under the influence they throw the book at you.
And, predictably, some people went nuts. This used to be a right wing / let wing concern, but now that we’re three generations into that massive consumption of weed on campus thing, we see people on both the left and the right on both sides of the issue. It’s come down to those who believe in freedom of choice and those moral uptights who believe if it feels good it must be evil.
It’s easy to recognize the latter. They’re the ones hiding behind seven year olds screaming “save the children.” They’re the ones like the New York Times’ David Brooks, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, and professional media gadfly Tina Brown, who, in the past 30 years, has run Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, The Daily Beast, and Newsweek. As of this writing, Tina’s looking for a new scepter.
All these blowhard busybodies want to control your life, as long as you don’t look too closely at theirs. Tina annoys me the most because she’s the wackiest: last Friday, she tweeted “legal weed contributes to us being a fatter, dumber, sleepier nation even less able to compete with the Chinese.”
That part about fatter might be true – if marijuana were removed from the planet, Nabisco and Kellogg’s would have to file for bankruptcy. The rest is absurd. The bit about the Chinese is more than absurd. She must have been high when she wrote that.
Here’s the bottom line: it’s none of your damn business. Keep your long prudish nose out of your neighbor’s anus. As the great American philosopher Mojo Nixon sang: Our governments try to tell you what to do; decide for yourself what’s right for you.
If you go too far and you get outta hand, then you take a little trip down to prison land.
Mojo si, Tina no.
Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com and on iNetRadio, www.iNetRadio.com as part of “Hit Oldies” every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week – check www.getthepointradio.com above for times and on-demand streaming information. Gold also joins MDW’s Marc Alan Fishman, Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.
Rick Oliver
January 6, 2014 - 4:31 pm
Had a medical procedure today that required that I have someone to drive me home, and the hospital verified my ride before starting the procedure and again before they let me leave the hospital. I’m ashamed to admit that I have driven when far more impaired by alcohol, and sometimes with my kids in the car. It is, of course, important to point out that driving while intoxicated is illegal and rightly carries some very stiff penalties — but as long as alcohol can be legally dispensed and consumed, I really don’t see any justification for not making marijuana legal. I’m little less enthusiastic about legalizing heroin and cocaine, but if people want it, they’re going to find a way to get it; so we might as well regulate and tax it. In the mostly rural community I live in, heroin addiction is a much bigger problem among teens and young adults than alcoholism; so it doesn’t seem like the legal status of the drug has much of a deterrent effect.
Mike Gold
January 6, 2014 - 4:34 pm
I don’t see where the government has the right to tell you not to use cocaine and heroin, let alone attach heavy sanctions on its use.
Whitney
January 7, 2014 - 12:10 am
Golden Boy –
Yes, pot can make you fat. And that fat can save your life if you are battling cancer, which is highly metabolic tissue that is jam-packed with mitochondria. If you are nauseous and can’t eat because of chemo, you die. Pot helps.
I don’t personally indulge because I like how my head works recreationally without any types of ‘i’s. But the criminalization of pot was a convergence of politics and commerce that protected the cotton lobby. Ya know, the one that got rich from slaves?
I don’t enjoy being under the influence of anything – particularly politicians.
Rene
January 7, 2014 - 7:25 am
On the one hand, I recognize that marijuana isn’t any worse than alcohol, and it makes no logical sense to forbid the one and allow the other. If anything, alcohol is the worse evil, because I never saw a stoned guy to get violent and beat his wife and kids.
On the other hand, I’ve seen first hand the devastation that drugs can cause, and believe me, it’s far worse than anything they can dream up for a lifetime movie of the week. Drugs can be soul-destroying, family-destroying business, and worse, it’s slowly-eat-your-soul-destruction that will take everyone around you. So I can’t ever return to the Liberal/Libertarian convictions of my youth. It’s a social atomic bomb, so I don’t mind so much if the government steps in.
On the third hand (and I’m running out of hands here), the politics of repression never managed to do a lot to save people from drugs, or even alleviate their situation. So you can count me as confused about the whole damned mess.
R. Maheras
January 7, 2014 - 9:03 am
I avoid almost all of that stuff, and don’t drive while impaired.
Speaking of driving hazards, the worst motor vehicle accident I almost got into was when I was driving with my wife and kids on the expressway, and my youngest daughter, who was pouting in the back seat because she had just been grounded, said out of the blue, “F**k you, Dad.”
It was the first (and I believe, last) time she ever threw that invective at me, and when I reflexively spun around in anger to glare at her, the wheel spun in the opposite direction, causing our car to cross several lanes in a split second, just missing a dozen or so other vehicles.
So driving under “the influence” can go far beyond legal or illegal mind-bending substances — although I guess kids can also fall into that category when they are at their worst.
Rick Oliver
January 7, 2014 - 9:41 am
“Drugs can be soul-destroying, family-destroying business, and worse, it’s slowly-eat-your-soul-destruction that will take everyone around you.”
From my personal and ongoing experience, the same can be said for alcohol.
Rene
January 7, 2014 - 10:12 am
Correct, Rick.
And that is why this is a complicated situation. Some people are able to enjoy alcohol and marijuana responsibly, some other people aren’t. And when you talk harder drugs, the percentage of “aren’t” probably rises.
The slight decrease of availability caused by restrictive laws is a good thing IMO. While the stigma of being labeled a criminal and the legal trouble addicts face makes things worse. Not to mention that it feeds organized crime. Both repression and legalization have their pros and cons. I don’t think this issue is clear cut.
And I still think “the government has no right to tell you not to use heroin” is (excuse my bluntness, Mike) a sound argument to make in a philosophical debate about liberty, but having had to live with the hell of a drug addict in the family, I can’t be that cavalier.
Rick Oliver
January 7, 2014 - 11:49 am
I don’t think Mike’s position is cavalier. We both lost a very close friend to heroin, and we are hardly strangers to the ravages of substance abuse in people we know and care about. Humans have been self-medicating throughout recorded history. Billions of dollars wasted on the “war on drugs” have proven the futility of legislating that behavior. So regardless of what I might feel about the government’s ideal or proper role in controlling access to mood-altering substances, I think the most sensible course of action is to legalize, regulate, and tax them all.
Rene
January 7, 2014 - 12:39 pm
I am sorry for your loss. But God forgive me for saying this, sometimes I think death is a relief, having a brother that has been addicted to crack for the past 10 years. I’m not talking only about the physical effects.
I’m talking about having a brother turned into a calculating psychopathic because of the cravings. Of seeing him steal from me and from many others, of putting the whole family into finantial debt to feed his addiction, of ruining my father’s old age, of exposing family and friends to sleazy drug-dealers collecting “their” money, of seeing him trying to beat the drug many times and failing.
Seriously, I can’t imagine anything in this life that is worse than drugs, more devious, more treacherous. So when people talk of the government having no business stopping people from self-medicating, what I hear is something like “the government has no business stopping people from opening portals that will bring mass-murdering demons to Earth.”
Except that heavy drugs are worse than mass-murdering demons.
Rick Oliver
January 7, 2014 - 3:36 pm
Once again, almost everything you describe about your personal experience with a crack addict can be applied to many alcoholics, and I speak from personal experience both in my own family and among alcoholics I have worked with in AA. Stealing, lying, cheating, conniving, manipulating are all too common among alcoholics. It’s no less devastating to loved ones than drug addiction. Unfortunately sometimes it just takes a little longer.
lorenzo ross
January 7, 2014 - 4:05 pm
Let me start by saying marijuana is not a gateway drug. That’s fear based BS the media feeds people. I have smoked pot. I know people that have/still smoke pot. Doctors, Lawyers, Teachers even Policemen. Never have I had the urge to shoot heroin because I’m thinking ” Hey, I’m bored with weed so smack must be the next logical step”. If you have an addictive personality you’re going to find something to destroy yourself with be it drugs, alcohol, food, gambling, sex you name it. This speaks to a deeper issue that must be corrected by a therapist or medical professional. Just toking a bud and watching a movie does not make you a degenerate.
That said, I really hope the Colorado experiment is a huge honking success for many reasons. One, to show mainstream America that the world will not end if you allow adults to purchase marijuana legally. There are forces that would love to keep it illegal because they see it as competition for their industry. Face it, in this world it’s all about money. It’s not about God, the children or country. In the end it’s about rich powerful people getting richer and more powerful. To wit, if the Colorado experiment (and Washington once they get their shit together) is a financial success then other states will see the potential for huge revenues and choose profit over propaganda.
Rene
January 8, 2014 - 3:33 am
Rick – True, and because the harder drugs tend to hook people faster than alcohol and marijuana, they’re that much more dangerous. But even alcohol is dangerous, like you said. And we have a culture, particularly here in Brazil, that still mantains that “a real man must have beer”. 20 years from now, it may be “a real man must have pot.”
As I said, marijuana may be less dangerous than alcohol, but I’m still not thrilled to see it made legal. I recognize that it makes sense to make it legal, but I can’t find it in me to pump my fist in the air and have a party because of it.
Lorenzo – I know that marijuana’s status as a “gateway drug”, dubious as it is, would vanish if it were made a legal drug, potheads would no longer be exposed to illegal dealers. And I have smoked weed myself a few times years ago, and I didn’t turn into a degenerate (no, I did that myself, with no drugs!:)).
Still, I know at least one “horror story” about marijuana. A dear lady, friend of mine, lost a fiance. The guy just lost himself in a haze of marijuana and there came a day when he just sat there smoking all day. Legalization, along with the publicity and social push to smoke pot that will develop, may make such cases more common. Or they may not. In any case, I don’t find it a case for celebration.
My attitude is a cautious “wait and see”.
R. Maheras
January 8, 2014 - 9:41 pm
Lorenzo — Pot’s role as a gateway drug is a media invention? Quit blowin’ smoke. Every person I knew in the late 1960s and early 1970s who went on to harder stuff started with pot. And the heavy pot smokers I knew were often like zombies, going through the motions of living while they waited for the next opportunity to get high.
Rene
January 10, 2014 - 3:58 am
That is true, Russ. It happened that way with my brother. Pratically everybody who is into harder drugs “graduated” from weed. But it doesn’t follow automatically that everyone who smoked weed graduated to harder drugs. I don’t know what the percentage is.
Like I said, it’s likely that the link exists because, presently, weed can be only acquired illegaly and thru getting in touch with dealers and addicts. If weed were to be sold in the drugstore, that would not be the case anymore.
Maybe. Like I said, I’m not certain, and I don’t think there is any way to be certain.
lorenzo ross
January 14, 2014 - 8:33 pm
Blowin’ smoke, very clever Mr. Maheras. For all the people you knew who went on to “harder stuff” I could just as easily point out people that use pot on a regular basis and maintain happy normal productive lives. Their only fear is of being persecuted for something that is nobody’s business but theirs. If you are an adult you should have the right to ingest anything you desire into your own body as long as do it in the privacy of your own home. Unless you are in favor of a true nanny state how can you be opposed to this? The key is understanding moderation. And if some people want to smoke pot all day and “go through the motions” so what? At least they aren’t out driving drunk or shooting up a school or something.
Rene- Alcohol IS the harder stuff as you explained about how drinking is in your culture. I’m truly sorry about your brother’s situation, but many people have much deeper personal issues that not even they can fully understand that drive them to constantly abuse substances. Why should those of us who understand moderation suffer because there are those that do not? I saw a TV show about a man who weighed 600 lbs and was killing himself by eating whole fried chickens and drinking soda by the gallon. So are we going to stop selling chickens and soda? Please,no nanny state people.
Rene
January 15, 2014 - 6:34 pm
Lorenzo –
I also have an alcoholic father. The funny thing is, to the outside world, by father was a model citizen, a real pillar of the community, as I was growing up. He was productive at his job, and his friends loved him.
Only inside the house, the story was different. I only knew him in two modes: drunk or nursing a hangover. He was always antagonistic and abusive (never physically, but a big, drunken man shouting at you everyday isn’t something I recommend to any child).
Are some constant drug users “productive” and “happy”? I suppose, but I would not take their words, or even their friends and co-worker’s words. Let’s ask the people who live with them.
That also calls into question the idea that you have the “right” to ingest anything in your own home without hurting anybody but yourself. I disagree with both liberals and libertarians, in that a man REALLY is not an island. He is not some discrete unit whose individual “rights” are holy, he is connected to many others. You don’t even need to appeal to religion or some metaphysical connection to see that.