MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Womb With A View, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld

January 11, 2014 Martha Thomases 1 Comment

lead-abortion-rallyAccording to this story in the newspaper of record, the state of Texas has found a way to create the kind of woman that the American Taliban loves.

A young woman, Marlise Munoz, was found unconscious in her home.  When her family rushed her to the hospital, she was found to be brain dead.  She had left her husband and parents instructions that she did not wish to be on life support.

So far, a tragic but unremarkable story.  She and her husband have a child, and it is not uncommon for people, when they become parents, to make wills and other end-of-life documents.  My parents did it.  I did it.  My husband did it.  Nothing makes the death of a loved one easy, but there is some comfort in knowing that we are doing what our beloved wanted us to do.

That comfort is being denied to the Munoz family.  Because Ms. Munoz was pregnant, she is being kept “alive” by machines.  Her fetus is more important than she is.  To quote her parents (and the news story), “It’s not a matter of pro-choice and pro-life,” said Mrs. Munoz’s mother, Lynne Machado, 60. “It’s about a matter of our daughter’s wishes not being honored by the state of Texas.”

The hospital insists it has no choice but to follow the law of the State of Texas as they understand it (if you read the full story, you’ll see that legal experts disagree).  They must treat Ms.Munoz as a patient, and, in Texas, the wishes of the patient, if she’s a woman and pregnant, are less important than those of a fetus, no matter how far along the pregnancy might be.  Certainly, it is now farther along than it was when she was first brought in.

It should also be noted that there is no clarity about the condition of the fetus.  Because Ms. Munoz was unconscious for a long period of time, it’s possible that the fetus was developmentally damaged.  The entire process is profoundly cruel to her parents, her husband, and her surviving child.

As the news story says, “If she is dead, I don’t see how she can be a patient, and I don’t see how we can be talking about treatment options for her,” said Thomas W. Mayo, an expert on health care law and bioethics at the Southern Methodist University law school in Dallas.

She can’t be a patient, and most of us in the reason-based community would say that she’s not a woman, either.  She’s a womb attached to a bunch of machines.

As I said, that’s how the religious fundamentalists, the American Taliban, like their women.  And Texas also sees to it that even women who aren’t brain-dead don’t get an equal opportunity to have their voices heard.  They have some of the most restrictive voting laws in the country, laws that disproportionately affect women.

Ms. Munoz is the poster child for these people.  She doesn’t have any opinions.  She doesn’t have any ambitions.  She is just an incubator for the seed of her husband — whether her husband wants it that way or not.

Speaking only for myself, but I prefer to live in a society where we allow people their differences.  In fact, we celebrate them.  And we respect adults to know what is right for each individual body living each individual life.  Hence, because I have the freedom of a very portable job, I don’t live in Texas.

But what do I know?  My womb doesn’t even work anymore, so I’m of no use to the American Taliban.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Neil C.
    January 11, 2014 - 7:23 am

    Good column. The so-called right-to-lifers care about the children, until they’re actually born. Then you’re on your own and are a welfare drain. The logic is hard to understand.

  2. Mike B.risbois
    January 11, 2014 - 9:27 am

    Monsterous.

  3. Tom Brucker
    January 13, 2014 - 7:35 am

    Frank Herbert predicted this.

  4. Rene
    January 13, 2014 - 11:53 am

    Wow. This goes far beyong a disapproval of abortion or euthanasia. It’s keeping alive someone who would be dead without the use of machines. We can say, with reasonable certainty, that God has already called Marlise Munoz and her unborn son to His side.

    Here is a good rule of thumb I use for anything, from religion to philosophy: As soon as it begins to dehumanize people, it’s a bad idea. It can apply as well to atheists considering an unburn baby to be nothing but a parasitical tissue, to religionists claming pregnant women have no choice on the matter of their own bodies.

  5. George Haberberger
    January 13, 2014 - 3:03 pm

    This story is tragic in the extreme. It certainly isn’t something that Marlise Munoz or her husband could have foreseen. If there were a simple resolution to this issue, it would have been resolved before anyone heard about it. But Rene makes a very salient point: “When something dehumanizes people, it is a bad idea.”

    My position that life begins at conception leaves no room for prevarication. The unborn baby is a human life and to kill it because the mother is dead seems to be the definition of dehumanization.

    Neil C said:
    “The so-called right-to-lifers care about the children, until they’re actually born.”
    This specious lie has been repeated so much that it hardly seems necessary to refute it. But silence is acceptance so I cannot let it stand.

    Pro-lifers run Crisis Pregnancy Centers, they foster children, they throw elaborate baby showers for single mothers they just met, they volunteer at soup kitchens, they volunteer at hospice centers, they do whatever is needed to support those who need help. Of course, Pro-Choice people do this too but it is a lie to imply that Pro-Lifers do not.

    One of the most vocal opponents of abortion is the Catholic Church, which runs the most extensive private health care delivery system in the nation. Compared to their competition, Catholic hospitals take a leading role in providing less-profitable services to patients. They lead the sector in breast cancer screenings, nutrition programs, trauma, geriatric services, and social work. In most of these areas, other non-profits come close, but hospitals run by state and local governments fall significantly off the pace. Where patients have trouble paying for care, Catholic hospitals cover more of the costs. For instance, Catholic Health Services in Florida provides free care to families below 200 percent of federal poverty line, accepting Medicaid reimbursements as payment in full, and caps costs at 20 percent of household income for families that fall between 200 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty line.

  6. Martha Thomases
    January 13, 2014 - 3:09 pm

    Pro-life people are as varied s pro-choice people. This is.not a debate about their moral worth.

    Pro-lif politicians, however, the people who make these dehumanizing laws (thanks, Rene), tend to support cutting food stamps and Medicaid and aid to public schools. I think it is fair to call these policies (and therefore the people who make these laws) anti-child.

    Specifically, and off the top of my head, Rick Perry, Paul Ryan and Rick Santorum.

  7. Rene
    January 14, 2014 - 3:24 am

    George –

    I’m against abortion and I also believe life begins at conception.

    However, I don’t think turning off the machines that keeps someone in a vegetative life is the same as “killing”. That person would be already dead if not for said machines.

    So I think the family’s wishes should have been respected in this case.

    I have a similar view on euthanasia. Say, a doctor kills a patient that would have lived for several more months, that is wrong. But let’s say a doctor has a special drug that allows a patient to live to 150 years old, but with a lot of pain. The doctor has no right to administer the drug against the patient’s will, just because he is “swore to preserve life.”

    I don’t consider withholding the use of expensive special equipment and drugs (particularly when the patient is unwilling) to be the same as killing.

Comments are closed.