MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Bite the Bullet, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld

May 24, 2014 Martha Thomases 8 Comments

Screen-shot-2012-05-30-at-8.56.18-AMThis may be old news to you, but over the weekend, I first came across the term, “trigger warning.”  In this usage, a “trigger” is something that might upset a person who has endured trauma, such as a rape or PTSD.  According to the article I read, this is a huge issue in academia at the moment.

Which is exactly where this discussion should take place.

At issue is whether or not students should have to read books (or watch movies, or be involved with other media) that might cause them to relive a traumatic experience.  Should they be warned in advance?  Should they be excused?  Should the rest of the class be denied the literary or scholarly experience because of these more vulnerable students?

While I have a great deal of sympathy for trauma survivors, I don’t necessarily agree with them on this issue.  I mean, sure, the course catalog should be descriptive enough that anybody — even a college student — can tell what subjects will be covered in the class.  And responsible academics should be compassionate enough not to include material for shock value alone.

After that, I think it’s like a food allergy.  If I’m allergic to peanuts, I don’t have the right to prevent anyone from eating peanuts.  It’s my responsibility to avoid products that contain them, and to ask questions when it’s not clear, such as a restaurant meal or a dinner party at someone else’s house.

And I’m not sure that it’s healthy, in the long run, to protect these victims from all possibility of flashback.  Don’t misunderstand me; I’m not saying that rape victims need to get over it.  I’m saying they should not let their victimhood define them.

Let me give you a more benign example, from my own life.  As one of the few Jews at my Episcopalian boarding school, I was painfully conscious of my differences from my friends.  Every single thing I experienced at the required chapel services was another pinprick.

And then, when I went to college, I was exposed to feminism.  Women were systematically oppressed, and had been throughout history!  Every social interaction demonstrated the power dynamics of patriarchal capitalism.  No one was more oppressed than we were.

And then I graduated, and went to work.  My life got more complicated, and so did my self-image.

See, it was really important for me to understand how I was different from other people, and what this meant from a cultural, historical and political perspective.  Because I felt those feelings, I could understand what other people meant when they described their own differences.  It wasn’t comfortable for me to be part of the oppressing group, whether that group was white people, straight people or middle class people.  I learned that sometimes the unacknowledged privilege is the most insidious.

Obviously, it’s more horrible to be raped than to be forced to sing a few hymns I don’t believe.  And I’m not saying that there should be times when a rape victim identifies with her rapist (or other kinds of violent people).  I’m trying to say that there will come a time in the victim’s life when he or she defines herself as something more complicated than a victim.

My husband died of lung cancer, although he hadn’t smoked a cigarette for more than 30 years.  It was horrible to watch him waste away as the cancer ate away at the body I loved.  Every time I pass someone smoking on the sidewalk, I get enraged.  I want to scream at those people, rip the cigarettes from their mouths and wave my finger in their faces.

I don’t.  It’s not effective.

College should be a place for the free exchange of ideas in the classroom.  It would be an extremely powerful experience for the class to listen to the experiences of a rape victim, or a veteran with PTSD, or some other person who might be triggered.  It might also be healing.

Certainly, it shouldn’t be graded.

Media Goddess Martha Thomases also gets teary-eyed at a Wonder Woman story about cancer that was published soon after her mother died.  Cancer sucks.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Mike Gold
    May 24, 2014 - 7:20 am

    Not only is screaming at smokers ineffective, outside of second-hand smoke in confined places it’s also none of our business. People have the right to kill themselves, and for smokers in 2014 that’s an informed decision. Not one I’d make, but I’d cook a cow over a Bic lighter if the barbecue sauce was good enough. Everybody’s got their dangerous habits. Screaming at strangers is a dangerous habit.

    “I’m saying they should not let their victimhood define them.” The problem with the sundry equal rights movements is that for a generation now we’ve come to define ourselves by our victimhood. I’m a victim because I’m culturally Jewish, egalitarian, carnivore, atheist, left-handed, and fucking weird. Defining ourselves as victims is anti-progressive. It stills personal and social growth. It’s a convenient excuse. Yeah, W. Clement Stone has nothin’ on me!

  2. Martha Thomases
    May 24, 2014 - 8:07 am

    I think it’s part of the process. I don’t condemn kids who, upon finding out they are different, wrap themselves in victimhood. I do criticize those with more life experience who do the same thing.

  3. Neil C.
    May 24, 2014 - 11:11 am

    I’m as liberal as the next person, but we have definitely gone too far in ‘protecting’ kids. (though I have none) Sometimes feelings get hurt; you have to deal with it, that’s what the real world is like. Nobody gets medals for participation once you get to the real world. Be sensitive, but not smothering.

  4. Martha Thomases
    May 24, 2014 - 11:58 am

    Actually, I think the world would be much better if we all got trophies all the time. I would like one for getting out of bed this morning.

    The problem is not whether or not someone needs special warnings. The problem is that millions of people have suffered trauma and need help. They need therapists and medical assistance and lots of other things that we, as Americans, don’t want to pay for.

    At the same time, publishers and movie studios and universities don’t want to get sued if someone flips out, so a trigger warning is a cheap fix.

    Certainly cheaper than creating a society that minimizes the opportunity for trauma.

  5. George Haberberger
    May 24, 2014 - 8:57 pm

    From the Incredibles:
    Helen: Everyone’s special, Dash.
    Dash: [muttering] Which is another way of saying no one is.

    I thought of that scene when you said “I think the world would be much better if we all got trophies all the time.”

    How special would those trophies be?

    And you may be a bit annoyed to discover that your opinion about trigger warnings is similar to Bill Whittle’s. He read the same New York Times article that you cite.

    http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=56&load=9775

  6. Martha Thomases
    May 25, 2014 - 5:49 am

    I got a medal for finishing the Marine Corp Marathon, just like every other runner who ran in it. I treasure it, even though it is hardly unique, nor did I run very fast. It was an accomplishment for me, one I trained for, one that required a great deal of effort.

    Just like getting out of bed on some days.

    The comments on the site you linked to explain a huge amount about how profoundly different my position is from Whittle’s.

  7. Jessica
    May 25, 2014 - 11:02 am

    I think you make some really great points. College classrooms should absolutely be about free exchange, and some of the trigger warning fervor puts that ideal at risk. I agree that emotionally challenging material is good for students. It should be available to them. The hard and important conversations that emerge from that material should be available to them. Medina’s article also has a discussion of the ways in which the issues surrounding trigger warnings are potentially more troubling for junior faculty, and when professors are building a syllabus with the idea that it shouldn’t make waves, everybody loses.

    When I’m teaching, I do make sure my students know when they’re going to be reading something that talks about violence in a way that might be triggering. It benefits everybody, because while an emotionally charged discussion can be a great experience, an emotional breakdown in a classroom completely unmakes the space of learning. To teach about gender based violence, I used to include a first person survivor narrative in the assigned reading. It was helpful for student’s who hadn’t had that experience, but it could not be good enough to justify how difficult it was for survivors to have to read and discuss that text. It isn’t right to ask students to put themselves on the line like that for other students to learn.

    Thank you for asking for my perspective, it’s really fun to get to talk to you about these things. I’m sure we’ll have some riveting conversations when you’re here in a few weeks.

  8. George Haberberger
    May 25, 2014 - 12:27 pm

    Martha,

    Congratulations on getting a medal for completing a marathon. That is a real accomplishment and deserves to be recognized. I suspect that people who did not finish the marathon did not get a medal and that the individuals who came in first, second and third received something in addition to a medal for completing it. This scenario, in no way, supports the idea that everyone should get trophies all the time.

    Please do not judge Whittle’s opinion by the largely anonymous commenters who attempt to hijack an editorial with cheap and crude self-aggrandizing comments. I hope that you watched the actual video and did not just read the comments. Whittle’s opinion that trigger warnings should be unnecessary on works of literature like The Great Gatsby and Huckleberry Finn seem to echo your statement: “And I’m not sure that it’s healthy, in the long run, to protect these victims from all possibility of flashback.” He’s just a bit more bombastic.

  9. Mindy Newell
    May 25, 2014 - 3:49 pm

    I know it’s not politically correct, Martha, but I’m against the “protect our kids from everything in the world which is nasty or ugly or will make them cry.”

    You mentioned that you received a medal for finishing the Marine Corps Marathon–BIG congratulations, btw!!!!!–because everyone receives a medal, and I don’t have a problem with that at all, because you’re an adult. You know the world doesn’t always award people for their efforts; you know that sometimes people lose.

    But my problem is when every single kid gets a ribbon or a medal or a trophy, especially in team sports. Sports teaches you lots of great things, and one of those things is that not everybody wins all the time. Sometimes you lose. And it’s important to learn to how to lose well, to accept loss, and, yes, to use loss to steam ahead. If you always get the prize no matter what, why should you try harder?

    As far as “trigger warnings” on works of literature…um, the point of reading is not just to enjoy and escape, but also to learn, is to react, is to feel, especially in works that are considered great literature. Reading CATCHER IN THE RYE doesn’t cause a kid to go postal and shoot up his teachers and fellow students; the warning signs were already there.

    They were just ignored or put down as a “phase.”

    I’m so tired of everyone pointing fingers at everywhere and everything except them selves.

  10. Mike Gold
    May 25, 2014 - 3:52 pm

    Wait a minute. Some people think kids who shoot up schools are just going through a “phase?”

    Well, I was going to take umbrage, until I thought it over and I realized they are correct.

    These kids are going through their FINAL phase.

    Sometimes it’s real easy to be a social Darwinist.

  11. Martha Thomases
    May 26, 2014 - 5:32 am

    I’m sorry, but I DO believe every kid is special. Maybe s/he isn’t the best athlete, but it seems to me that the point of Little League (and other after-school, non-academic programs) is to instill the joy of teamwork, the thrill of using one’s body for something besides holding in what was taught in class and sitting on the couch.

    As someone who was on a losing swim team for the better part of a decade in my youth, I can assure you that, when I got a third place ribbon (in a race with three people), I knew I hadn’t won. But I also knew that I showed up and put in the effort.

    If the point of sport to remind the masses who is best, then I guess everyone shouldn’t get a trophy. But if the point of sport is joy and fun and friendship, then I think that’s worth a reward for everyone.

    Because we are, in fact, each of us special.

  12. Mike Gold
    May 26, 2014 - 5:55 am

    If everybody is special… what does “special” mean?

    However, each of us IS unique.

    Well, except for our clones. But as I consume their organs for my life-extending transplants, they, too, become unique.

  13. Neil C.
    May 26, 2014 - 11:14 am

    I was a lousy baseball player, but lucky enough to be on a good Little League team so I collected a few championship trophies, but was smart enough to know those were in spite of me. My last year, the team was awful and there were no trophies. I think something like finishing a marathon is different, that’s not something anyone can do and is an actual accomplishment. It just seems we’re more interested in protecting children from harsh realities. I have friends who are teachers who when kids in the class do poorly, the parents will blame the teacher. In my day, the teacher’s word was gold and my parents would tell me I had to do better.

  14. Rene
    May 26, 2014 - 3:04 pm

    As for sports trophies and the like, I feel that schools often make a great disservice when they try to teach sports only in the context of a competition. I spent the first 3 decades of my life as very averse to physical exercise, on account of traumatic school experiences that lots of nerds know about.

    It was only when I was in my 30s that I realized that one could practice weight-lifting, running, bycicling, hiking, and only expect the best “trophy” of them all: more health, a better body, more confidence, without any need to “defeat” other people.

  15. Whitney
    May 26, 2014 - 3:09 pm

    M –

    As a little girl, my little sister Holley only once didn’t do well at a gymnastics tournament. I think she got a 7th place ribbon which was a mealy pinkish beige color.

    When asked what she had learned because it was a family tradition for us all to play Pollyanna’s Glad Game, Holley said she had learned that she never again wanted a mealy pinkish beige ribbon.

    Bad stuff can also – in time – lead us to bravery , then strength, then success. That’s what I aim for…er, I mean “For which I aim”. Why would we deny the wounded an opportunity to overcome?

    Crossing fingers and gritting teeth.

  16. Mindy Newell
    May 26, 2014 - 3:55 pm

    Martha, I didn’t say that I don’t think every kid is special and unique. OF COURSE I DO! And I was a swimmer in high school, and sometimes I came in LAST–but swimming is a sport in which, even though there are teams, the individual swimmer is really swimming against him/herself; in other words, trying to beat their last time in any given event.

    And I also agree with you about the other things you learn as part of a team or in an individual sport such as track and field or swimming: teamwork, the joy of really pushing yourself and your body, the great way you feel about your physicality–BTW, THAT’S VERY IMPORTANT FOR BOTH BOYS AND GIRLS!!!!–

    I’m just saying that learning how to lose is just as important.

  17. Mindy Newell
    May 26, 2014 - 3:56 pm

    Mike:

    Ha, ha. Very funny. You know what I meant–do I have to really explain it to you?

  18. Mindy Newell
    May 26, 2014 - 3:59 pm

    Rene, that’s the fault of the coach and the school. A good coach always reinforces the young competitor’s ego, even if he or she who doesn’t do well in a game or a meet .

  19. Mindy Newell
    May 26, 2014 - 4:00 pm

    Neil,

    Exactly!!!!

  20. R. Maheras
    May 30, 2014 - 10:36 am

    Most people have endured some sort of trauma, so trying to eliminate “trigger” material is probably an exercise in futility.

    For example, someone I know was in a horrific car accident as a teenager, had her wrist and ankle rebuilt, part of her face reconstructed, was in a coma for a month or so, and was told she’d never walk again. She’s now in her 50s, walks just fine, had kids, and is doing pretty well for her age. So whenever she’s in a mopey mood goes down the “Oh, my car accident” road, I remind her that she never thought she’d make it to 25, let alone 55, and she’s outlived a number of her peers. She got a second chance, and she’s doing pretty well, I think. And trigger-wise, I doubt a week goes by where there’s not a trigger in real life of pop culture reminding her of her accident. I think the key is learning to cope with such things, not try and avoid them entirely. That’s a losing battle, since filtering out every potential trigger is impossible.

  21. Rene
    May 30, 2014 - 12:33 pm

    Russ –

    In addition to what you say, the pop psychology notion of what a “trigger” is seems right out of Hollywood movies.

    Because, many times it’s stuff that is not immediately obvious to the average person that will trigger a bad episode.

    Let’s say someone has developed a phobia related to death or dying, because they just lost someone important to them. One would think that watching a movie where lots of people die might be a trigger, right? Maybe. But maybe that movie is so obvious about death that it has no effect. Maybe it’s a “sneak attack”, like reading that treatise about existentialism and the futility of a brief mortal existence that will send the person into a new spiral of depression.

    Emotional issues are complex. Even if you remove all obvious filters, what about the inobvious ones?

  22. Rene
    May 30, 2014 - 12:34 pm

    Ooops, I meant “triggers” in the last line, not “filters”.

Comments are closed.