You and Me Against the World, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld
November 8, 2014 Martha Thomases 1 Comment
It’s been a mixed week for progressives. On the one hand, Republicans took control of the Senate and strengthened their hold on the House. On the other hand, Washington, DC, voted to legalize marijuana.
Okay, those are not equivalent. I’m not happy with Tuesday’s outcome, and I don’t particularly want to talk about why I’m not happy. You can guess the reasons. Instead of griping about the specific results, I want to talk about what I consider to be a bigger problem.
Democrats suck.
It’s the conventional wisdom that Obama is not popular. That’s what the polls say. That is traditionally what happens to a president at the midway mark of a second term. A lot of people, especially those who subscribe to the conventional wisdom, think he’s not popular because he’s too far to the left.
If only.
Despite the fact that many of the more insane Tea Partiers (not all!) think he’s a Kenyan Muslim socialist, Barack Obama is actually pretty centrist. His health care plan, which some consider to be socialized medicine, in fact put billions of dollars in the hands of private insurance companies, as well as doctors, hospitals and clinics (via the insurance companies). It was created by the conservative Heritage Foundation.
A lot of other things that he’s done that the (wackier parts of the) right wing accuse him of doing are equally moderate. The build-up of troops in the Middle East isn’t something that any leftist supports. We certainly don’t support a blanket approval of everything Israel does. We think his environmental efforts are tentative at best. Don’t get me started on gun control. The list goes on and on.
However, the right accuses him of being “liberal,” and the Democrats flee in fear. Instead of taking pride in the things Obama has done successfully (job growth, increase in support for health care reform, etc.), they strive to paint themselves as something other.
You know what I call something other than a Democrat? A Republican.
Not every Democrat agrees with Obama, nor do I expect that. Traditionally, there has been a wider range of opinions within the Democratic party than the GOP. That’s healthy.
However, when Alison Lundergan Grimes won’t say if she voted for Obama, even though she was his delegate to the convention, that’s not a matter of disagreeing on issues. That’s cowardice.
It’s also stupid. Faced with a choice between a fake conservative and a real conservative, most voters will choose the real one (or not vote in those races, which is what I do). They may or may not agree with conservative positions, but they know where the candidate really stands.
It’s a disservice to the voter, who is trying to select a representative in the marketplace of ideas. We don’t get a real sense of what the people want, only what the handlers think we want to hear the candidates say. We don’t all want the same things, but it’s hard to tell when the same commercials air all over the country, with only the names changed.
When there has been a real choice between progressives and conservatives, we can see that, in some places, the progressives win. Here’s a quote that says what I’m trying to say:
“One trend that was interesting last night is that clear, strong progressives like Jeff Merkley (OR), Tom Udall (NM), Brian Schatz (HI) and Al Franken (MN)– who had massive right-wing money thrown at them– won, while conservative Democrats like Mark Warner, Mary Landrieu, Mark Udall, and Kay Hagan stumbled and the most conservative Democrat of all, Mark Pryor, lost badly”
There’s also this:
“All of it has left some to wonder whether Warner would have won bigger if he had eschewed the middle and embraced the left, and whether the winning path for moderates that Warner forged during his own bid for governor 13 years ago is becoming extinct.”
Does this mean progressives would win everywhere? No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying that running on sincerely held progressive platforms is more appealing than fly-by-night conservative flip-flopping. One might lose, but at least one fought the good fight.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I think I’m going to try to book a weekend in Washington.
Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, wishes more people would vote, even those with whom she disagrees.
Neil C.
November 8, 2014 - 7:35 am
Unfortunately, except for the comedy news shows, the media lets the right drive the agenda and the Democrats/progressives are always on the defensive or given “have you stopped beating your wife” questions. I have yet to hear anyone on the right ever criticize even the most batshit ideas, instead using the old Kreskin line “who says it might NOT be true?” Makes me wish Obama would come out in favor of oxygen.
Mike Gold
November 8, 2014 - 7:54 am
Neil, the comedy news shows seem to report the facts more accurately than the “straight” teevee news shows — they started holding Obama accountable long before it became acceptable in the news racket.
Martha, don’t run from your comment about legalization of marijuana. Unlike Oregon and Alaska, where weed also was legalized, legalization in the District of Columbia requires the approval of Congress. Washingtonians voted in favor of legalization 7 to 3 — a remarkably clear indication of the will of the people. Will arch-conservatives nullify that?
I hope not. Damn, I can’t think of a group of people that needs mellowing out more than Congress.
Howard Cruse
November 8, 2014 - 8:21 am
I’m really frustrated that we’re all supposed to be “Ready For Hillary” even though the Clintons were the most unreliable of allies when they were in power. (Remember Lani Gwenere? Remember Joycelyn Elders? Both kicked off the bus expeditiously as soon as they dared to advance the most sensible, albeit politically inconvenient, propositions! Like, in the latter case, that kids need not feel guilty about masturbating. Duh.)
I like the idea of electing a woman president, but I do not trust Hillary to reliably (and passionately) represent my values any more than Obama has (which is not to suggest that I would have preferred that McCain and Palin win. Shudder!). But I feel the Hillary steamroller bearing down on me and am loath to court the wrath of all the women who see her as the Great Feminist Hope.
I would love to be able to vote for Elizabeth Warren, but it feels premature for her to make a bid in 2016. I am inspired by Bernie Sanders, but fear that, despite his intelligence and good intentions, he will function as a Nader-ish spoiler if he runs and will end up splitting the progressive vote and delivering us into the maw of a Republican Presidency.
So call me resentful and conflicted at this point. And Hillary will get my vote reluctantly if need be. The one political movement that I can get wholeheartedly behind right now is Move To Amend , but the national electorate will have to be uncharacteristically rational for that to advance from progressive pipe dream to reality.
I mean, we couldn’t even get there Equal Rights Amendment ratified! How fucked up was that??!!!
I remember when we could view the U.S. Supreme Court as the protector of democracy. As an Alabamian who came of age during the Civil Rights crisis of the ’60s, that meant a lot. But now a majority of its members seem as enamored of Big Money forces as the most craven of our elected officials.
Oops. I’ve been ranting, haven’t I? Sorry about that.
Dwight Williams
November 8, 2014 - 8:35 am
Don’t apologize, Howard. Otherwise, Stephen Harper and other local craziness of the last couple of weeks notwithstanding, we’ll have to offer you citizenship up here.
Dwight Williams
November 8, 2014 - 8:42 am
If enough people on the Republican side demonize Warren sufficiently, though, that may render her more viable than originally expected, yes?
Martha Thomases
November 8, 2014 - 10:12 am
One of the worst parts about a Hillary candidacy is that we’ll have to hear over and over that she’s too “liberal” when she’s just as beholden to corporate money as any Republican. She’s just as hawkish as any Republican. And then, by branding her “liberal,” the media will effectively more the entire discussion that far to the right.
Mike Gold
November 8, 2014 - 10:46 am
Oh, Hillary is more of a hawk than quite a few Republicans, McCain notwithstanding. And as the recent secretary of state she’s in a position to “justify” her war wherewithal by forming strong alliances with sundry world leaders.
Nonetheless, any port in a storm. She’s certainly preferable to the current crop of GOP contenders such as Michele Bachmann, John Bolton, Jeb Bush, Fat Fuck Christie, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, Rand Paul, Mike Pence, Rick Perry, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Rick Santorum, and Scott Walker.
And, if Mike Huckabee becomes our next president, I’m going to ask Dwight Williams if he’ll extend his offer (above) to me. Dwight, can any Canadian offer citizenship to Americans, or do you have a special gig? I’ve got to retire somewhere, sometime, and I really like Canada.