The Heart of the Matter, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld
August 20, 2015 Victor El-Khouri 3 Comments
If there’s anything equally as annoying as “mansplaining” feminism, it must be a middle-aged white person like myself “white-splaining” racism. I’m going to try very hard not to do that. At least not here, out in public.
Please call me on it if I do.
The group, Black Lives Matter, formed after a series of murders of unarmed black people by police officers. The group’s name alone incited white animosity. “All lives matter,” muttered Caucasians who felt as if the name was some kind of reverse racism.
It isn’t. The name means, “Black Lives Matter AS MUCH AS WHITE LIVES!” Duh.
Another way white people often deflect the very serious issues raised by Black Lives Matter is to point out that most black people are murdered, not by police, but by other black people. And this is true. Most people are murdered by someone they know, so it isn’t surprising that almost every murder victim is killed by someone of his own race. The issue isn’t that murder is bad (which it is), but that police officers are not supposed to shoot unarmed African-Americans for any reason, especially not for non-violent misdemeanors.
Previously, the group had disrupted a campaign speech by Senator Bernie Sanders. This week, a video surfaced of a meeting Hillary Clinton had with representatives of the group. The activists plan to show up at events for every candidate running for president.
Bernie Sanders is, at this moment, my candidate. I like his campaign, the way he focuses on economic inequality and the needs of working families. Having said that, I was disappointed in the way he initially responded to the women who interrupted his speech. He seemed miffed, which I understand, but it’s not helpful.
His supporters were, often, even worse. They dismissed the concerns of the activists, lamenting instead that Bernie was too good a guy to be charged with racism. He marched with Dr. King!
Which is great, of course. I very much admire Martin Luther King, and wish I had been old enough to march with him. But that was 50 years ago, and marching didn’t solve all the problems. It brought them into the light. People who oppose racism need to fight it every single day to the best of our abilities.
Hillary, in the video, responds better than Bernie, I think. Of course, she had the benefit of some warning, having already seen what happened to Sanders. She listens, she’s responsive, and if she doesn’t always give the answers I would consider to be correct, it’s clear that she cares deeply about the subject, and has the same goals (if not the same tactics) as the activists.
There was an interesting discussion about this on The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore. Really, go watch it.
Here’s what’s interesting to me about the exchange between Hillary and the activists. She is initially a bit defensive, which I understand. If a black person tells me about institutional racism, my gut reaction is to immediately announce that I don’t do that. Which might be true, but isn’t helpful. The bad part about racism is that it exists and oppresses people of color. My personal guilt and/or discomfort is not the point.
When Hillary suggests legal and policy solutions to the problems, the activists (as I understand it, which might be wrong) say it is more important to change what is in people’s hearts. I think they are both right. There have to be people pushing for changes in the racist culture in great, arching gestures, and there have to be people changing the minutiae of the laws.
(And there have to be people demanding that the police, whom we charge with upholding those laws, are not fearful, violent, racist thugs. They are supposed to behave better than criminals. Otherwise, they are just another street gang.)
I look forward to more discussions about these issues over the course of the campaign, especially as they involve more candidates.
I promise to try to stifle my guilt in an attempt to make this all about me.
Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, finds that her racism is like an onion. There’s always another layer to peel off.
Howard Cruse
August 21, 2015 - 7:33 am
While the challenging of assumptions about privilege and unacknowledged racism is going on, some distinction needs to be made between “adversaries,” (whether they be “sheeple,” politicians, or other lower life forms) and individuals who are trying to navigate minefield-laden territory in good faith. Whether such distinctions will actually be made in the heat of Black Lives Matter activism is another question. The appeal of firebrand-ism and “no more business as usual” obstructionism is strong, especially to the young (and here I’m remembering how self-righteous we opponents of the Vietnam War could be) and especially when the historical justifications for untempered fury are undeniably real. So if the past is a guide it’s doubtful that “well-meaning” white liberals are going to be cut much slack while unarmed black citizens are being gunned down with no questions asked. My only hope is that the valuable ideas embodied in a candidacy like that of Bernie Sanders don’t get devalued and his candidacy itself de-railed because a “well-brought-up Vermonter like Sanders doesn’t instantly know what to do with what feels in the moment like thew unjust disruption of noble goals.
Back in 1968 I was so furious that Gene McCarthy was sidelined by the more charismatic Robert Kennedy, that RFK was then eliminated from the equation, and that Hubert Humphrey failed to break with LBJ over Vietnam in a timely way that I sulked through an election that gave us all Richard Nixon. I don’t think I was alone in that emotional indulgence.
Martha Thomases
August 21, 2015 - 12:12 pm
Howard, I thought Sanders response over the next several days was quite good. Unfortunately, our media doesn’t allow for thoughtful responses that take time to develop.
Rene
August 21, 2015 - 4:38 pm
Martha is right. I don’t think the dummies that complain and split hairs about a slogan like “Black Lives Matter” are much different from “Why there aren’t any Straight Pride Parades!?!?” “I know what racism is like because my grandma is Irish” and other such gems.
Or, for that matter, the “anti-identitarian” Libertarians that think racism is entirely caused by Liberals, and if only everybody stopped taking “race” seriously, our problems would be over. That is the conservative version of saying that if only we all held hands and chanted peace songs, there would be no more war, famine, or any problems at all.
Racism is real and still a big problem. Deal with it. Complaining that you’re white and not racist is not needed. You’re not under attack personally when people point out quite correctly that there exists institutional racism.