Pants Inspector, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld
April 12, 2016 Victor El-Khouri 0 Comments
In all my years of peeing, I have never — ever — seen a naked woman in a public bathroom. I’ve seen a few pants-less babies getting their diapers changed, but never a person old enough to wear underpants.
So I don’t entirely understand what’s going on with all these new laws. The sponsors say that refusing to allow transgender people to use the bathroom of the gender with which they identify will protect women and children in the ladies’ room from assault by men wearing women’s clothes solely for the purpose of using said ladies’ rooms. In order to stop this, the new law requires all people to use the bathroom for whatever gender they were assigned at birth.
Maybe things are different in men’s rooms, but there is no simple way to see the genitals of any person in a women’s rest room. We don’t have urinals, and all of our stalls have doors. Unless I stood on the toilet seat and looked over the wall, I would have no idea who was next to me, much less what her bits looked like. It is entirely possible I’ve been peeing next to transgender women for my entire life.
And yet, this really terrifies some people. They think that rapists all over the world are, even as we speak, buying women’s clothes for the sole purpose of going into women’s bathrooms. I suppose they might be, but rapists are not the same as trans women. In fact, there has never been a case of a transgender person assaulting anyone in a bathroom.
So now they’re passing these laws that require a person to have a birth certificate before going to the bathroom. Who is going to enforce these laws? Will I have to pull down my pants first and get checked by the pants inspector? Is there a reason to think that rapists might find that job even more fun than cross-dressing?
I understand that the issue of transgender people is confusing. One of my very best and oldest friends is transgender, and she has patiently explained herself to me ever since she came out more than a decade now, even though I often ask very stupid questions. She just spent the weekend with me, and we managed to go out to eat and use bathrooms in a variety of places without incident. We went shopping and tried on women’s clothes in women’s dressing rooms and, to the best of my knowledge, no one paid us the slightest attention. If the sales clerk noticed anything out of the ordinary, she very politely showed no signs of it.
The problem, I think, is one of empathy. The anti-trans legislators cannot imagine themselves in the place of trans people. They worry about their wives and/or children being in the same bathroom with a trans woman, but they can’t imagine how terrifying it must be for trans women who must now, by law, use the men’s room. For that matter, they can’t imagine how their wives and/or children would react in a ladies’ room being used by a trans man.
Maybe this is why they don’t understand why those of us who aspire to empathy stand with our transgender siblings.
Rape and assault are illegal. Anyone who goes into a rest room (or any other room) and rapes or assaults a person should be arrested, tried and, if convicted, face punishment. To support the rights of trans people to pee where they are most comfortable in no way encourages criminal violence.
At the same time that the Religious Right worries about rapist trans people, they continue to be blind to those who really do threaten their wives and children. Too many children continue to be abused by those who pose as priests, teachers, family friends, and other pillars of the community. Instead of passing these ridiculous bathroom bills, let’s prosecute those who mess with kids and those who cover for them.
Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, loves Bruce Springsteen more than ever.
Sheila
April 12, 2016 - 9:50 am
I went to an art high school in New York City back in the 70’s. One of the things besides the art that I liked about the school was that it was all inclusive. There were numerous ethnicities, religions, socioeconomic backgrounds and sexual orientations. On the surface we all got along. There were lesbians in the girls room that I never felt threatened by. We ladies all laughed and joked together. We also had transgender girls who occasionally had problems in the boys room. The way my school handled it was they made an-other bathroom that could be used by the transgender girls so that they would be safe. I didn’t find out about this until after I’d graduated. (My school was progressive but it was still the 70’s) My point is, it’s not rocket science and I should know because although I’m not a rocket scientist; my daughter has a friend that is. (I apologize but I’ve been waiting for the opportunity to say that.) These new laws have another agenda and it’s fueled by divisiveness and hatred. PERIOD!
Rene
April 16, 2016 - 3:50 pm
I gotta agree with Martha on this one. LGBT people have always been stigmatized as sexual predators, when in fact, most predators have been socially powerful people with lots of access to the victims (often their own fathers, stepfathers, uncles, guardians, boyfriends, religious masters, teachers, bosses) ironically some of the very people that go into witch-hunts against LGBT people.
Their lax approach when fighting THOSE predators (claiming there is an epidemy of “false rape”, or inventing bullshit excuses for churches who cover up pedophiles) is in sharp contrast to their eagerness to defend the “victims” when it’s a persecuted group being scape-goated.