MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Just Another Moral Monday, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld

May 18, 2013 Martha Thomases 15 Comments

slash-dont-buy-right-to-work-600x840In the midst of exploring this week’s scandal, that the IRS targeted right-wing groups applying for 501 c4 status, I discovered something I didn’t know.  Which is great, you know, because that’s why one does research, to find out things one doesn’t know.

For example, I thought 501c4s were a rather new invention, but, in fact, one of my favorite organizations, the NAACP, is one.  And, true to form, was subject to a political inquiry because of its political leanings back in 2004.

So, if I wanted to, I could start a diatribe about left vs. right, the role of taxes in our society and the authority of the federal government in determining who pays how much.

But I don’t want to.

 

 

 

 

Instead, I want to talk about this:  the fact that there have been demonstrations in Raleigh, North Carolina every Monday for close to a month now.  Dozens of people have committed non-violent civil disobedience and been arrested at these “Moral Monday” events.

How have we not heard about this?  If any story seemed perfect for a so-called left-leaning media, it would be this.

Here’s the thing:  the news media doesn’t really lean left.  Sure, there are people with opinions in charge, and their choice of story varies from news outlet to news outlet, but, in the end, everyone is working for a paycheck. And that paycheck is issued by a big-ass corporation that wants to protect its big-ass corporate interests.

Sometimes, there is a simple explanation for the news choices — money, which is earned by ratings.  So this week, we’ve seen O. J. Simpson more than we’ve seen the Reverend William Barber of the North Carolina NAACP.

And sometimes, there is elitism at work, and the people in charge of the news think we, the people in the audience, are too stupid to understand a political story that isn’t about sex or scandal.

In this case, I’m willing to cop to the paranoia and say that the people demonstrating in Raleigh are simply too dangerous to the status quo.  Their demands combine issues that those in charge don’t want combined.  Voting rights, education equality, healthcare for all, worker access to collective bargaining — these are things that even network-employed Democratic pundits don’t want to discuss.

Look, I understand that the corporate news media isn’t going to discuss the relationship among labor rights, voting rights, healthcare, job creation and economic mobility in 21st Century America.  I can even understand that the media that claims to “support the troops” doesn’t want to discuss a system that forces soldiers’ families to go on food stamps.  A news media that thinks Obama is a leftist doesn’t know how to talk about Guantanamo.

Still, 49 people were arrested this week.  At the same place.  At the same time.  That’s more than were arrested in Boston and Cleveland combined.  If 49 members of Operation Rescue (or whatever they call themselves these days) were arrested at a women’s health clinic, I bet they’d be on the news.

But then, that’s about sex.

This is about jobs and being able to get a living wage.  Who could be against that?  Oh, yeah, right.

Despite the lack of national media coverage, the Raleigh demonstrators seem to be upbeat.  It’s also possible that their message is getting out to other groups who are inspired by their efforts.

I know I am.

Media Goddess Martha Thomases remembers how difficult it was to get tax-exempt status for Friends of Lulu.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Mike Gold
    May 18, 2013 - 7:43 am

    Sex? What does baby-making have to do with sex, you heathen?

  2. Howard Cruse
    May 18, 2013 - 8:35 am

    Martha, if national news time was spent covering labor struggles in North Carolina, we might not learn that Jodi Arias has a copy of The Optimist magazine in her jail cell, which was the subject of a special Jane Velez-Mitchell report on CNN this morning. How awful would THAT be?

  3. tom brucker
    May 19, 2013 - 8:46 am

    Human rights protests are old news. Ho-hum. Media bias leans heavily towards the new and exclusive.

  4. George Haberberger
    May 20, 2013 - 11:14 am

    “Still, 49 people were arrested this week. At the same place. At the same time. That’s more than were arrested in Boston and Cleveland combined. If 49 members of Operation Rescue (or whatever they call themselves these days) were arrested at a women’s health clinic, I bet they’d be on the news.

    But then, that’s about sex.”

    You’d lose that bet.
    Of course they’re still called Operation Rescue. Why would they have changed their name? And that’s not about sex. It’s about death, which is why the Boston and Cleveland arrests made the news. Yes, no one was killed in the Cleveland arrests, (unless you count the forced miscarriages, but you probably don’t), but those women were presumed dead.

    Since you’re blogging about demonstrators protesting to bring awareness to a human rights issue, isn’t it ironic that the IRS wanted Pro-Life groups to pledge not to protest at Planned Parenthood clinics as a condition for tax-exempt status?

  5. Rene
    May 20, 2013 - 2:09 pm

    I can see how that might be two different issues:

    – Concern for the fetus, that supposedly has a soul like any other human being. That is the life and death thing.

    – A desire to curtail any kind of sexual activity that takes place outside of a Christian marriage. For that, they fight abortions, condoms, pills, etc. That is the sex thing.

    I think a lot of people that claim to oppose abortion for reason 1 actually care more for reason 2, or at least consider both reasons equally important, and inseparable in their mindset.

    The irony is that more widespread use of the pill would reduce the number of abortions. Another way in which the conservatives work against themselves.

  6. George Haberberger
    May 20, 2013 - 3:14 pm

    Rene,
    Operation Rescue concerns itself exclusively with abortion. The organization does not fight against condoms or any pre-conception contraception method.

    “I think a lot of people that claim to oppose abortion for reason 1 actually care more for reason 2, or at least consider both reasons equally important, and inseparable in their mindset.”

    No, I do not think that is the case. Pro-Choice people may wish that to be true to better cast the Pro-Life movement as some backward, hide-bound collection of hypocrites, but it’s not and we are not.

  7. Rene
    May 20, 2013 - 5:48 pm

    Really? It seems that Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue, is also known as an anti-contraception activist, according to his Wikipedia page.

    That is the problem with America. These values come pre-packaged. I’d love to see a Pro-Life organization that is feminist and for sexual freedom. Just like I’d like to see, say, a group of pro-capitalist military men pro-choicers. Just for the hell of it.

    But that is not to be in America. Maybe you can find some individuals that have such “disparate” opinions, but not powerful organizations.

    I see them not so much as “hypocrites”, but as guys that are too loyal to their “side” to admit that much of the policies they defend are contraditory in real life. Such as capitalism being such a huge catalyst of social change, the very thing conservatives oppose.

  8. George Haberberger
    May 20, 2013 - 7:23 pm

    Really? “According to his Wikipedia page”?

    Nothing on Operation Rescue’s actual website deals with contraception. But it does say this is in a couple of places:
    “Information about Operation Rescue and Troy Newman found on Wikipedia is inaccurate and should be ignored. It should also be noted that numerous independent blog sites found on the Internet have no accountability and should not be trusted as a source of accurate information about Operation Rescue. If anyone has any questions about us, please contact us directly.”

    Your desire to see individuals that break stereotypes seems to be something you think is unlikely or impossible. Those people already exist. Google pro-life feminists or pro-life atheists or pro-life liberals. All these groups have their own websites and I would list the addresses but that always seems to hold up posts.

  9. Martha Thomases
    May 21, 2013 - 7:52 am

    This is how the right-wing works, by using a wedge issue to distract us from the real point. In this case, I as talking about how there is apparently a growing movement in North Carolina to fight the state legislature on issues of healthcare, education, collective bargaining and voting rights.

    It’s a war on the poor, Constant Readers. And lives are literally at stake, as this study demonstrates: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-medicaid-expansion-20130519,0,5679842.story.

  10. Rene
    May 21, 2013 - 1:55 pm

    Even if the Operation Rescue website doesn’t deal with contraception, I would be surprised if most of their members were pro-contraception. Even at feministsforlife they seem oh-so-careful when they speak of contraception, as if afraid to allienate conservative allies.

    I visited a couple of liberal and feminist pro-life sites. I identify more with them than with pro-life conservatives or pro-choice liberals. But a lot of the talk on the sites was how they are treated as weirdos that don’t belong anywhere. That justifies my opinion that people who deviate from the liberal or conservative stereotype on abortion are a poorly-regarded minority.

  11. George Haberberger
    May 21, 2013 - 3:19 pm

    “That justifies my opinion that people who deviate from the liberal or conservative stereotype on abortion are a poorly-regarded minority.”

    You are right, but I believe that is gradually changing.

  12. George Haberberger
    May 22, 2013 - 9:46 am

    “This is how the right-wing works, by using a wedge issue to distract us from the real point.”

    Well you mentioned Operation Rescue and the insinuation that that was no longer their name. How was that relevant? I commented on that because you brought it up. And it dovetailed into Pro-Life organizations being told not to demonstrate for human rights, (again, what you posted about), at Planned Parenthood if they expected to be granted tax-exempt status.

    To your point, I was in a labor union for 19 years. I worked as typesetter, paste-up artist and proofreader for a union shop. We were members of the International Typographers Union for a few years then absorbed into the Communication Workers of America. I was even shop steward for a couple of years. When desktop publishing and Quark Xpress came about, most of our clients decided to do their own typesetting. The business became less of a typesetting operation and more of a service bureau like Kinkos. Unfortunately, the company could not charge union typesetter prices for service bureau work. Our union, who incidentally always promised the Democrats their members votes, (something I found irritating), insisted on maintaining wage rates. After a slow spiral, the company went out of business. The union’s emphasis on labor rights ushered their members right out of a job and the owners who invested most of their lives in their business, into retirement. Ironically since the shop was a closed-shop, the owners themselves were required to be union members.

    And again it appears Martha’s post was delayed until this morning. What’s up with that?

  13. Martha Thomases
    May 23, 2013 - 6:26 am

    Institutions run by humans will always be as flawed as individual humans. Which means that anecdotal evidence will always exist, but will not always prove anything. What happened at one particular business doesn’t necessarily reflect on society as a whole.

    Consider this, from Senator Elizabeth Warren. You may not like her politics, but her facts are still, well, facts.

    “If we started in 1960 and we said that as productivity goes up … then the minimum wage is going to go up the same … the minimum wage today would be about $22 an hour. So my question — with the minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, what happened to the other $14? It certainly didn’t go to the workers.”

    Which is why we need stronger unions and collective bargaining.

  14. Rene
    May 24, 2013 - 4:54 am

    The Right’s dislike of unions obviously comes from their unconditional love of that nebulous entity called the “free market”. But a world without unions, or with weak unions, wouldn’t be the Randian paradise they advertise. I think it would be more like Dickens’s England.

    So yeah, they’re absolutely needed. Not that I always agree with what unions do. George and Russ would have heart attacks if they lived in Brazil for more than one month. Many of our unions are so leftists that they spend money on pro-Palestine demonstrations and such antics.

  15. George Haberberger
    May 24, 2013 - 10:43 am

    “You may not like her politics, but her facts are still, well, facts.
    ‘So my question — with the minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, what happened to the other $14? It certainly didn’t go to the workers.’ ”

    Senator Warren’s facts are only factual mathematically. Yes, if the minimum wage were tied to productivity, a 300% increase in productivity would result in a 300% increase in the minimum wage. But there are a few problems with that methodology. Her presumption is that the “missing” $14 went to the “millionaire” owners. People running Mom and Pop businesses are hardly millionaires, but those are the businesses that pay $7.25/hr. That presumption completely disregards the advancements in technology and robotics. The workers who make minimum wage are not the ones responsible for increased productivity. Increased productivity results from skilled, educated employees. Besides, if productivity went up at the same rate as wages it wouldn’t be productivity. Productivity is more output for less input. If input (labor and wages) went up or down with the output, productivity would be flat.

    Minimum wage jobs are supposed to be entty-level positions. If a minimum wage was intended to be a living wage the result is that opportunities for advancement and economic growth would no longer exist in this country. We would become a minimum-wage nation. There would be no incentive to improve your situation. Why endeavor to get a better paying job if you can get by flipping burgers? Or working for Wal-Mart or the federal government? http://www.nbcnews.com/business/federal-government-creates-more-low-wage-jobs-wal-mart-1C9910466

    I have decades of work experience, a rigorous work ethic, and a college education and am proficient in Adobe InDesign, Illustrator and Photoshop. I do not make $22 an hour anymore, (see previous post). How much would I need to be paid if someone with none of those attributes needed to be paid $22 an hour? How much would a car cost if assembly line workers’ pay increased commensurate with the minimum wage of 22/hr? A loaf of bread? Senator Warren can say outrageous things like this because she knows nothing will come of it due to the detrimental economic effects yet she still looks like the champion of the oppressed who will vote for her because she appears to be looking out for them.

    Rene said: ” Many of our unions are so leftists that they spend money on pro-Palestine demonstrations and such antics.”

    My union was, (probably still is), in bed with the Democratic Party so the difference is only a matter of degree.

Comments are closed.