The Future Holds a Lion’s Heart, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise
August 29, 2009 Martha Thomases 22 Comments

As you can see from the photograph, I met Ted Kennedy once. While I don’t remember the exact date, it must have been before 1971 because I can tell from my hair and my outfit that I’m in high school. That’s when we were all wearing skirts made from an Indian bedspread and an elastic waist-band. My hair is too long for it to have been 1968, so it was either right before Chappaquiddick or soon after.
The occasion is a fund-raiser for our local Congressman, whose name I can no longer remember. He’s the short little man standing next to me, the one who looks like a malevolent sprite, with the lights behind him resembling nothing so much as devil horns. My father is on the far left, and that’s my mom next to him. I am the only person who doesn’t know how to smile at the camera like a person.
And thus, my brush with greatness.
It’s interesting to read the various memorials to Senator Kennedy this week. Obviously, your political convictions will color your feelings about his passing. The crazies can’t stop talking about Chappaquiddick. More thoughtful conservatives talk about his abilities to reach consensus on issues that were important to him. And liberals mourn the passing of a passionate advocate for those things they hold dear.
Edward Kennedy’s life was a jumble. He made egregious mistakes, and he made heroic efforts. He came from a life of privilege, and spent his days championing those least fortunate. Through him, we can see ourselves at our best and at our worst.
It has fascinated me for decades the way the right wing in this country obsesses over Mary Jo Kopechne. Her death was a terrible tragedy (is there any other kind?), but I believe it was an accident. As humans, we have accidents. They do not ascribe bad motives to Laura Bush, who accidentally killed an ex-boyfriend in a car crash, but Ted Kennedy gets no such benefit of the doubt.
Laura Bush is not an elected official, and as such, her actions, perhaps, deserve less scrutiny. However, the people of Massachusetts had ample opportunity to pass judgement on Kennedy, and they did, re-electing him to office many times.
Kennedy could have taken the easy way out. He could have withdrawn from public life after this and other embarrassments. He had plenty of money and plenty of power. However, he chose to put himself out because he felt an obligation to public service.
That’s what I find so admirable. Kennedy sacrificed his own comfort and convenience to work for the common good.
Perhaps, for the next decade, he felt obliged to run for President. His father wanted one of his sons to be President, and Ted was the only son left. I always thought that losing his campaign in 1980 freed him to do the work he really wanted to do. He found his voice best on the Senate floor, and working for his fellow Democrats.
Not everything he did pleased me. I wasn’t thrilled about the way he worked with Bush to pass No Child Left Behind. It’s not in my nature to agree with the compromises he frequently sought. Still, I admired his passion. I enjoyed the way he threw himself into his work, his family, and his life.
He made mistakes, and he went on. It’s a lesson to us all about what makes life worth living.
—-
Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, wishes Mad Dog another happy year of a life worth living.
Mike Gold
August 29, 2009 - 6:51 am
Which one’s you?
Martha Thomases
August 29, 2009 - 7:27 am
@Mike: I realize you probably can’t recognize me because I still have my original, pre-reduction breasts (and my back hurts just looking at this picture), but that’s me on the right.
Reg
August 29, 2009 - 7:39 am
Well said, Martha. A balanced retrospective. As my father said to me with emotion behind it…”We’ve lost a friend.”
May he rest in peace.
Francine G Burke
August 29, 2009 - 8:22 am
A lovely, honest tribute… and so special to be able to illustrate it with this photo… R.I.P Ted Kennedy.
Francine
John Tebbel
August 29, 2009 - 8:23 am
Anybody seen my old friend Teddy?
pennie
August 29, 2009 - 10:10 am
“We cannot know for certain how long we have here. We cannot foresee the trials or misfortunes that will test us along the way. We cannot know God’s plan for us.
“What we can do is to live out our lives as best we can with purpose, and love, and joy. We can use each day to show those who are closest to us how much we care about them, and treat others with the kindness and respect that we wish for ourselves. We can learn from our mistakes and grow from our failures. And we can strive at all costs to make a better world, so that someday, if we are blessed with the chance to look back on our time here, we can know that we spent it well; that we made a difference; that our fleeting presence had a lasting impact on the lives of other human beings.
“This is how Ted Kennedy lived. This is his legacy.”
President Obama in his eulogy today
Russ Rogers
August 29, 2009 - 12:14 pm
The Legacy of the Kennedy Brothers is twisted. The public eloquence and achievements for social justice and reform are marred by a history of many crimes, including buying elections, literally getting in bed with the mob and obstructing justice.
Laura Bush and Teddy Kennedy both killed people in car accidents. That is where the similarity in their stories end. I’m surprised that you would make the comparison, Martha. And it’s not the accidental death of Mary Jo Kopechne that makes Teddy Kennedy’s actions that night so vile. It’s the circumstances surrounding her death, especially the attempts to cover it up.
Laura Bush was driving to a party with a friend in the car. She was 17 and driving distracted, chatting with her friend. She ran a stop sign and T-boned another car. Both cars were traveling at 50+ miles per hour. The odds of her missing the other car were greater than hitting it at those speeds. She didn’t know who she had hit or that the other driver was dead until she was told at the hospital by the police. She made no attempt to hide her involvement in the accident or blame her friend. She made a tragic mistake, but immediately took responsibility for it and showed appropriate remorse.
There have been people who have tried to ascribe bad motives to Laura Bush’s actions. But those stories just don’t make any sense. Laura Bush’s actions were negligent, but not criminal. On the other hand, Kennedy’s actions were criminal and cowardly. What were the noble motivations of Ted Kennedy that night? I have trouble thinking of any.
Teddy was at a party. He had already been drinking when he left the party with a young, attractive woman who had been a political secretary. The circumstances of the accident are hazy. Some conjecture that Kennedy was driving with his lights off, so he wouldn’t be seen and recognized tooling about after dark with a woman who was not his wife.
When he drove off the Chappaquiddick Bridge it was a tragic accident. But, he was probably more criminally liable than Laura Bush. After all, he was an adult and probably intoxicated.
But it’s his actions AFTER the accident that are still so appalling and galling. He was a Senator who should have known that the first thing to do, the right thing to do, the legal thing to do would be to immediately contact the Police. But, he didn’t contact authorities. There was a house just a few hundred yards from the accident. Did he go there? No. He walked much farther, across the island, back to the party with his friends. Did he burst into the party saying, “Oh my God! I just had a terrible accident! Someone call the police!”? No. He secretly left the party with friends and tried to fish poor Mary Jo Kopechne’s body out of the drink himself. This was not a rescue effort; this was damage control. When he and his friends were unable to recover the body, did they then call the authorities? NO! Instead, Teddy Kennedy swam the channel between the island and the mainland. The ferry back had stopped running hours before. When he got back to his hotel, did he call the front desk? YES! He complained about the noise coming from another room in the hotel. Why? My guess is that he was trying to establish an alibi, that he had been in his room all night and not out carousing on the island with the now long dead, Mary Jo Kopechne.
It wasn’t until the next day, when the authorities had been alerted to the accident (not by Kennedy or any of his friends mind you) and were already busy recovering the VW Bug and the body of Mary Jo Kopechne that Senator Kennedy came forward with his involvement in the accident. This was hours and hours later. It was only after Teddy Kennedy realized his friends wouldn’t be his scapegoat and take the fall for him and that his family money couldn’t buy the silence of everyone involved, it only then that Teddy came forward to admit some involvement with the accident.
Senator Kennedy showed no respect toward Mary Jo Kopechne that night. His was craven and despicable. He behaved like an entitled brat. I think he showed very little respect or regard for the lives of the women around him, at least not his wife nor Mary Jo Kopechne. As a feminist, I’ve always considered it an insanely sexist act. His criminal behavior (and he only plead guilty to leaving the scene of an accident) resulted in a two month sentence, and that was suspended before it even began. Paris Hilton served more time in jail for driving without a license.
Seriously Martha, if you were involved in a fatal accident, would you spend the next nine hours sneaking around with your friends, trying to figure out a way to cover it up? Trying vainly to establish an alibi? Or looking for someone else to blame?
Teddy Kennedy did some amazing work in the Senate. But he did not lead an exemplary personal life. I won’t deny that Kennedy was a great man. Publicly and politically he was in the vanguard of so many important social and political issues. But personally, Kennedy was (for a good portion of his life) a spoiled, overpriveliged drunkard, an unfaithful womanizer and a coward. Publicly, Kennedy was a bell weather of sound policy. Ironically, privately, he often seemed to lack a moral compass.
I know it’s not right to speak ill of the dead. And Kennedy often spoke for the downtrodden and disenfranchised in our society. He was a champion for people who often don’t have a voice in Washington. But he didn’t speak up for Mary Jo Kopechne, not for nine LONG hours the night she died. And he was not a hero or champion for Mary Jo; he was a drunken lout, a sniveling cad. Call me crazy, but I thought it was poetic when I saw that “Mary Jo Kopechne” was a trending topic on twitter the day of Ted Kennedy’s death. The stench of that incident cast a pall over the rest of Kennedy’s life and justly so.
Maybe I’m a loon, but if Chappaquiddick kept Kennedy out of the White House, good. It certainly showed that he was not a man who was capable of handling himself honorably in a crisis.
Alan Coil
August 29, 2009 - 1:38 pm
Way to slag one of Martha’s heroes, Rogers. Couldn’t wait until the body was cold, could you. How typical.
Russ Rogers
August 29, 2009 - 2:27 pm
Typical of a crazy? You think calling Ted Kennedy a great man on the vanguard of social justice was hurling slag?
Elizabeth Turner Haase
August 29, 2009 - 3:07 pm
The congressman was Carney. I can’t remember his first name. And I remember that Martha T. It was nice to see pictures of your parents from that time.
We do all make mistakes. It seems to me it is what we do with them in the years beyond that counts.
Alan Coil
August 29, 2009 - 5:03 pm
No, Russ, it may have been your other 13 paragraphs of unneeded information that most of us, especially Martha, already knew.
Martha Thomases
August 29, 2009 - 6:23 pm
@Russ: I did not make light of the mistakes Senator Kennedy made regarding Mary Jo Kopechne. Neither did he. That was my point – he described his actions as “inexcusable,” but then spent his life trying to make things better.
Nor did I mean to malign Laura Bush. She was 17 (and probably would have been tried as an adult, if what she had done was not an accident, and if the conservatives had their way about when to try children as adults). She, too, made a mistake.
I’ve heard all kinds of weird conspiracy theories over the years about Chappaquiddick. My personal favorite is that Kennedy had another woman in the car with him, and Mary Jo was in the back seat, sleeping off a drunk. In this scenario, he didn’t know she was there.
In any case, what he did was wrong.
If I was caught making a mistake like that, I would have crawled into a hole until people forgot about it. Kennedy didn’t do that. He went on living his life in public, and trying to do good. I find that admirable. You, apparently, don’t.
Cyndi Tebbel
August 29, 2009 - 9:26 pm
Proud to call you my sister-in-law.
Steve Atkins
August 30, 2009 - 3:10 am
*sigh*
People will all too often shove their politics and religious nonsense into things and cause a problem.
It’s easy to spout hate about either Kennedy or Laura Bush. Given their marriages and relations, it’s easy to drag their families into it.
ALL too easy.
The point is this:
Ted’s dead, that’s that.
Those who disliked him can breathe a sigh of relief at his passing.
Those who admired him can breathe a sigh of regret at his passing.
It is my opinion that we, as a people, should be able to express these passionate viewpoints without reducing ourselves to some form of feces-tossing primate who has no respect or regard for the feelings of others.
I believe that we all have the potential to be all of the wonderful things we’d like to be.
Just a thought.
Steve
MOTU
August 30, 2009 - 3:26 am
Love him or hate him Ted Kennedy did GREAT things for this land. He never hid when he fell from grace and when he was behind something it usually got done.
That is a legacy most Presidents would like to have when THEY leave office.
Russ Rogers
August 30, 2009 - 5:45 am
I admire Ted Kennedy. I can see how you admire his public perserverence in the face of personal tragedy. Many of those tragedies were not his making, not his doing.
The actions of Kennedy the night of Chappaquiddick were forgivable, but like he said inexcusable. It’s not just that he did the wrong thing, but he also convinced so many his friends to continue to do the wrong thing that night.
I don’t think our justice system should be based around vengeance. But it has irked me for many years that a man could do something SO wrong and get away with just a slap on the wrist. He got two months probation. And he didn’t even lose his job. And I don’t think Kennedy learned enough from the experience. It didn’t change his attitude toward alcohol or women. Maybe it taught him to use a limo more.
It wasn’t until after his nephew William’s rape case, in 1991, that Kennedy really rethunk his attitudes toward drinking and carousing, and treating the women in his life like disposable lighters. I heard many people eulogizing Kennedy this week thanking his second wife, Vicki, for helping make that seachange.
It took more than twenty years from Chappaquiddick for Kennedy to make that change. That’s a long time to learn a lesson from an “inexcusable” mistake.
Kennedy stood on the right side of many social and political issues. He worked hard and achieved more over the course of his career than his three brothers whose lives were all tragically cut short put together. It’s a rhetorical question, but how much more could the Kennedys have achieved if their righteous public stances had been backed by men with less privilege and more personal character?
I did not intend to throw slag or feces. But it irked me to be seen as crazy or worse conservative just because I was talking about Chappaquiddick the day Kennedy died.
From Wikipedia: After Kennedy’s death, Ed Klein, an editor for New York Times Magazine and an author of several books about the Kennedy family, stated that one of Kennedy’s “favorite topics of humor was indeed Chappaquiddick itself. And he would ask people, ‘have you heard any new jokes about Chappaquiddick?'”
Personally, I haven’t heard any. Not any good ones. Have you?
John Tebbel
August 30, 2009 - 7:14 am
Nothing you can learn how to be but to
No, I’ll leave it there.
Janet
August 30, 2009 - 1:34 pm
Nice hair! and the guy really does look he has horns, did they do that on purpose??
Everytime I go to MV, we bike by Chappaquiddick and comment on what happened.
Uncle Robbie
August 31, 2009 - 12:50 am
@ Russ: I don’t know what’s worse about you, that you believe your assumptions about what actually happened the night of Mary Jo Kopechne’s death might have any basis in reality, or that you’ll quote something from Wikipedia as fact. In any event, while you may not be crazy, you’re certainly a loon. Now put your tin foil hat back on and take your meds.
Martha, you were always lovely.
Russ Rogers
September 2, 2009 - 7:36 pm
@Uncle Robbie Oh, I’m a certified loon. But even a loon and Wikipedia can be right some of the time. Did Kennedy “make light” of his mistakes by collecting jokes about Chappaquiddick or was he rubbing metaphoric salt in his wounds, beating himself with the horse-hair whip of dark humor? Either way, if Kennedy sought out new jokes about Chappaquiddick, that certainly was tasteless.
I don’t know exactly what to believe about Chappaquiddick. I was seven when the incident occurred and I wasn’t there. So, if you have a better interpretation of the events of that night, one that seems more reasonable to you or more defensible of Senator Kennedy actions, Uncle Robbie, I’m willing to hear it.
Joyce Carol Oates is a better writer than I am. She wrote in a piece about Ted Kennedy and Chappaquiddick: “The poet John Berryman once wondered: ‘Is wickedness soluble in art?’. One might rephrase, in a vocabulary more suitable for our politicized era: ‘Is wickedness soluble in good deeds?’
This paradox lies at the heart of so much of public life: individuals of dubious character and cruel deeds may redeem themselves in selfless actions. Fidelity to a personal code of morality would seem to fade in significance as the public sphere, like an enormous sun, blinds us to all else.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/27/edward-kennedy-usa
Uncle Robbie
September 6, 2009 - 12:35 pm
@ Russ: You don’t seem to be able to grasp concepts easily, so I’m going to try and simplify this for you. The events of the night of Mary Jo Kopechne’s death are not open to interpretation. They happened and we don’t get to know the details. We have no access to the memories of Senator Kennedy or those of Miss Kopechne. The only two people who knew what happened (and for what reasons) remain silent. Everything else is fiction.
As for the alleged quote by Ed Klein, my Uncle Keith’s advice has never in the past been truer than it is now: “Believe nothing that you’re told and only half of what you see with your own eyes.”
Too many syllables? My bad.
Mike Gold
September 6, 2009 - 4:48 pm
I think that questioning Kennedy’s lack of forthcomingness regarding Chappaquiddick is valid, and I can hardly blame anyone for wondering at the time if Ted had the sort of steady hand and presence of mind to be president — at the time. We blame Cheney for his conduct surrounding his hunting accident; I think it is fair to hold every presidential candidate or holder of high office to that same standard.
Too soon? No. I think the world of Ted’s behavior and technique post-Chappaquiddick. But when I look at the incident itself, I find his behavior lacking forthrightness.