MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Glitter and Be Gay, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise

November 7, 2009 Martha Thomases 9 Comments

marriage-equality This week’s most disturbing election news is not that I’m going to have to listen to this guy on my local news channels for the next term of office.  That’s bad, believe me.    

Unfortunately, even that is not as bad as the fact that voters in Maine overturned their legislature’s ruling on gay marriage.  

It seems to me that our Constitution guarantees equal protection under the law to all citizens.  This equal protection not only grants us certain privileges, but also requires us to exercise certain responsibilities.  We can vote and use government services, including police and fire departments, and be defended by armed forces, but we must also pay taxes, serve on juries, and clean up after our dogs (among other things).  

In fact, being a citizen is a lot like being married.   There are privileges (sex with the person you love on a regular and convenient basis, someone to share child-raising, meal preparation, cleaning, etc.) and responsibilities (the previously mentioned child-raising, meal preparation, cleaning, along with mutual health-care decisions, debts, and getting along with the in-laws).    

The easiest solution to the gay-marriage issue would be to separate Church and State.  Religious marriage would be subject to the rules of each couple’s faith, and legal marriage would be subject to the rule of law.  However, this is not a solution that the people in Maine, among others, appear to desire.  They want to vote on which legal adults can be married.  As long as they’ve opened the conversation, here are some other types of people whose marriages I’d like to nullify:  

• Anyone who sells the photo rights to their ceremony to the press.  It’s bad enough they will get more – and better –

wedding presents than I did.  but they don’t have to rub my nose in it. 

People whose religious preferences require them to dress alike.  I don’t care if it’s side curls and wigs, or pinafores and funny hats.  When I see that, I wonder how they can tell each other apart.  Disgusting. 

Couples who walk around with full backpacks.  They are twice as annoying as single people with backpacks. 

Couples who dress like twins.  Too much like incest for my taste. 

Whoever wrote this.  Talk about taking all the fun out of it.  I mean, ick. 

The obese.  Yes, I know they’re human beings, and they have a right to love others and express their love physically.  However, just thinking about them having sex with each other creeps me out.  What they do in the privacy of their own homes is fine, but it threatens my marriage (and my libido) to allow them to marry. 

Let’s get going, people!  I expect these initiatives to get out the vote in the mid-term elections!  

Martha Thomases, although a Media Goddess, is not able to marry people at this time.  She is taken.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. ettacandy
    November 7, 2009 - 6:05 am

    Amen, sistuh!

    LOVE the photo!

  2. Eddie
    November 7, 2009 - 7:51 am

    If Obama doesn’t care who can and can’t marry, why should I?

  3. Vinnie Bartilucci
    November 7, 2009 - 8:02 am

    After all this talk of marriage and sex, I accidentally mis-read the phrase “mid-term elections”.

  4. MOTU
    November 7, 2009 - 10:07 am

    Someone should tell the GOP that sisters and brothers should not marry…

  5. Howard Cruse
    November 7, 2009 - 2:15 pm

    Thanks, Martha. It’ll take me a while to assemble my thoughts about this. (I’m still working on California Prop 8.)

  6. John Tebbel
    November 7, 2009 - 2:23 pm

    I don’t think this country is healthy enough to have sects.

  7. Martha Thomases
    November 7, 2009 - 3:12 pm

    @John: Yeah, we aren’t careful enough about sectually contracted diseases.

  8. pennie
    November 7, 2009 - 4:30 pm

    A curtsy your way Martha.
    Disappointed in the Downeasters? Yeah. But I take heart–it’s getting better all the time. Marriage laws are changing all over. DC and New York are moving along and the voters in Washington State got it right. Even in little Kalamazoo, Michigan, there was a gay and trans addition to the groups already protected by that city’s anti-discrimination law. Obama signed the Matthew Shepard Hate crime act and a gay and trans-inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)had hearings in the Senate this past week and is headed for a full vote early next year. Repeals of DOMA and DADT aren’t far behind
    This is all big in my world–and I believe resonates for many here. Times they are a’changin’. Sugarcoat discrimination but hatred toward any group drags down the most prevalent race–the human one.
    Remember the Maine? You bet. But the percentages are heading in our direction. If I can legally marry a woman in Iowa, Maine, California, and others can’t be too far behind.
    If I can add to your list, incestuous elephants marrying and mating should be included as well.

  9. John Tebbel
    November 8, 2009 - 7:07 am

    Was able to observe mating elephants one afternoon at the National Zoo. In the pool. Awesome.

Comments are closed.