Having My Baby, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise
January 16, 2010 Martha Thomases 27 Comments
What fresh hell is this? “Some abortion opponents are pleasantly stunned and eager to watch Scott Roeder tell a jury his slaying of Wichita doctor George Tiller was voluntary manslaughter. Tiller’s colleagues and abortion rights advocates are outraged and fear the court’s actions give a more than tacit approval to further acts of violence.”
That’s right. According to the judge in this case, it may be okay to kill a doctor if you disagree with his religious and/or political beliefs. If he performs abortions – a legal medical procedure – you can shoot him at any time, and in any place, and that’s not premeditated murder.
Nobody likes abortion. It’s not fun. Women – including militant feminists – do not wake up in the morning and wonder, “Should I go to the movies or get knocked up so I can have an abortion next month?”
And yet, women – not just militant feminists – have always had abortions. Anthropologists have found instructions for making aborticants in ancient tombs.
Many of the people who oppose abortions say they’re concerned with saving babies. It is my observation that, while some may be sincere, many others want to punish women for having sex. That’s why they support exceptions for victims of rape and incest. You can have an abortion as long as you didn’t have any fun. From this, I infer that they consider children to be a punishment.
Oddly, they don’t seem to think that the men who father unwanted children should be punished. Obviously, men don’t get pregnant. I would suggest that every time a man has sex without a condom, he be required to pay a year’s child support into a general fund from which mothers could withdraw funds as needed. It would be like Social Security for the fertile.
I had an abortion when I was younger. I had just graduated from college, and newly moved to New York City. I was no longer on the Pill because my mother had breast cancer and I was leery of taking more hormones, so I used a diaphragm. Religiously. I filled it with spermicide twice a day, whether I thought I would have sex that day or not.
And I still got pregnant. Later, I found out that, over a five year period, 80 percent of women who use a diaphragm will get pregnant.
I wasn’t ready. I knew I wanted kids someday, but not then. I made $150 a week at my job. I was a ditz. And I’d seen how much work it is to raise a child properly. So, I scheduled an appointment with my doctor.
It was a relatively simple procedure. i wasn’t more than six weeks along. My doctor had an office on Fifth Avenue that was state of the art.
Let me tell you, it hurt like nothing else I had ever felt. Years later, I would recognize it as the pain that comes with stretching the cervix. No one, no matter how stupid or immoral she might be, would go through that experience thoughtlessly.
Which brings me to my point: Women are humans, and they make decisions about their bodies with the same mix of intelligence, superstition, and situation as any man would do. We are not frail little girls who need to be coddled. You don’t need to murder our doctors because you don’t like our choices.
Choosing to have an abortion is complicated. Choosing to have a child is complicated. A human fetus grows within another human, and both have a stake in the outcome. No one should force a woman to have an abortion, and no one should force a woman to have a child.
The Catholic Church didn’t ban them until 1869. Unfortunately, they have a longer history of antagonizing those who give medical care to women. Midwives (along with Jews) were a major target of the Inquisition.
The AP story further notes: “”The State encourages this Court to not be the first to enable a defendant to justify premeditated murder because of an emotionally charged political belief,” the prosecution wrote. ”Such a ruling has far reaching consequences and would be contrary to Kansas law.””
If this defense is permitted, it is good news for the American Taliban. They may not be able to promise their acolytes 72 virgins in Heaven, but they can negotiate a shorter sentence in the here and now.
I’m waiting to see who gets shot for serving shellfish.
Media Goddess Martha Thomases would like to jump on the Help Haiti bandwagon with the recommendation that donors consider these guys.
Howard Cruse
January 16, 2010 - 7:54 am
Wow! Thanks for alerting me to this disturbing turn in Wichita. I hadn’t heard.
One wonders if the same judge would rule, if he were on the bench in new York City when Ammar al-Baluchi goes on trial, that the defendant should be permitted to argue in open court that killing three thousand people on 9/11 was a justified act based on the perceived ongoing villainy of the U.S.
John Tebbel
January 16, 2010 - 8:30 am
And “If it were men who became pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.”
Mike Gold
January 16, 2010 - 8:53 am
Never forget — what’s good for the goose is great for the goose’s owner.
Women are property, here to serve man — literally. They’re cooks, maids, sex toys, and baby machines. Just shut the fuck up and stay away from the goddamned coat hangers until I’m tired of you.
Howard: Great point, undermined by the fact that you’re being too damn logical.
Jonathan (the other one)
January 16, 2010 - 9:47 am
Actually, Martha, Christians can get away with eating shellfish and cheeseburgers, because in the Gospels, Jesus said it was okay to eat whatever (“It is not what goes into a man’s mouth that condemns him, but what comes out” – which I guess means fellatio is okay, as long as you don’t spit).
However, I am still waiting for the first person to justify a murder by claiming that the victim was in violation of Biblical strictures against cotton/poly blend clothing (wearing clothing woven with two types of cloth).
Alan Coil
January 16, 2010 - 11:06 am
Perhaps this is the first step to legalizing murder. Slippery slope there, judge.
Jeremiah Avery
January 16, 2010 - 11:15 am
Isn’t this the same state that has the Creationism museum? It’s hard to believe any sort of rationale rule of law will prevail in an area that thinks “The Flintstones” were a documentary.
Martha Thomases
January 16, 2010 - 2:33 pm
@Jonathan: If Christians are going to insist that everyone follow their rules, than they should have to follow mine (or what would be mine if I kept kosher). Leviticus is as Leviticus does.
MOTU
January 16, 2010 - 2:56 pm
More things to do when I finish my Time Machine:
7. Go back and somehow prevent WICHITA, Kan. from existing.
8. Become a fan and a friend to Howard Cruse much earlier in my life.
9. Tell Martha I love her…wait I can do that now…I love you Martha.
10. Avoid people who’s mom and dad were brother and sister. Pat Robertson, Rush Asshole, judges from WICHITA, Kan.
Martha Thomases
January 16, 2010 - 3:05 pm
@MOTU: et toi.
pennie
January 16, 2010 - 4:00 pm
As ever love, right on target.
When I read the news that day, aw hell…
As a people, we are seem to be ever so polarized. Those of us who mourn each threat or loss of freedom and expression— whether reproductive, civil, personal, racial, religious, sexual or any other…versus those who gather to restrict, intrude, remove or further impede any semblance of progress.
There was a time we thought music could change the world. It changed ours so why not everyone else?
Not so easy.
These are agonizing developments you chronicle. Open season on freedom riders again. This time not so much regionalized but based on belief. Dr.Tiller dedicated—and lost his life–while helping women receive voluntarily requested medical relief. If this man was a criminal, so was Mother Theresa. Both spent their lives helping those in difficult situations.
Those who had alternatives or were geographically fortunate certainly didn’t require either the good doctor or the religious and humanistic icon.
When do we free ourselves from male entitlement? Apparently there are many miles to go before we rest.
Keep the faith, sister!
Reg
January 16, 2010 - 5:29 pm
Yeah… I got nuthin’.. Other than to express that this decision does not evidence wise jurisprudence.
Martha Thomases
January 17, 2010 - 8:29 am
@Reg: You should feel free to disagree. We seem to be able to do that with respect. And we may find some common ground. For example, I bet we agree that abortion isn’t fun, and that doctors shouldn’t be murdered.
Mike Gold
January 17, 2010 - 8:35 am
MOTU – When it comes to Kansas, I’m torn. On one hand, you’ve got more in-your-face my-way-or-the-highway bible-thumpers than Marvel and DC have trademarks, and some of these people are EXTREMELY dangerous.
On the other hand, I’ve got a few good friends out there (Rick Stasi is perhaps the nicest guy ever to walk upright on the planet) and it’s the hub for character licensing — particularly if you toss KC-MO in for balance.
Most important, eastern Kansas IS Mecca for barbecue. And the very best damn fried chicken I’ve EVER had in my life (Strouds). Each time I’ve been there I’ve had to wait at least an hour and sometimes two. I NEVER wait more than 30 minutes anywhere… EXCEPT Strouds. And it’s always been worth it.
So the next time I go to eastern Kansas, I’m dressing up as The Sorcerer’s Apprentice. They can deal with it, if I can deal with the inevitable Disney suit.
pennie
January 17, 2010 - 8:59 am
Martha, you KNOW that the most hateful so-called “Church” on this planet is Fred Phelps Topeka, KS-based Westboro Baptist Church and his spawn: http://www.godhatesfags.com
He claims Katrina was caused by God’s wrath over New Orleans’ longtime acceptance of a wide range of human behavior. He’s the one who shows up at military funerals to mock and proselytize. He despises women.
Yeah, Kansas.
Glad I’m not in Kansas any more.
pennie
January 17, 2010 - 9:01 am
Yeah, Martha…Mike…I got my M % M’s confused. Melts in my what?
Mike Gold
January 17, 2010 - 12:54 pm
Pennie — Yep, Fred Phelps might very well be the single most disgusting person in our nation of 300,000,000 people. That’s quite an achievement. I mean, simply being in the top percentile would be quite an achievement. He’s the tops.
Best thing I’d read in 2009: the armed forces now provide (if asked) physical support at the funerals of gay soldiers, sailors and airmen, just to ward off Phelps’ hideous supporters. And their anti-gay actions aren’t the only activities on their hate-filled agenda; they’re so anti-Jew that they make Father Coughlin come off like Golda Meir.
I’m not in favor of the death penalty, but sometimes summary execution sounds like a good idea. Phelps’ Fuckers fits into that category. I can’t imagine why anybody but a complete psychopath would worship THEIR god.
pennie
January 17, 2010 - 1:31 pm
Mike, I agree. Phelps is human enemy numero uno. He is despicable. There is no single fate I can wish for this miscreant. Submit suggestions to this space.
MOTU: Can we add Phelps—YESTERDAY?
Puhleeeeze?!!!
Time Machine…
Reg
January 17, 2010 - 3:33 pm
@Martha… On that common ground there is no doubt.
Re: Phelps… He may wear the name tag of Christian, but you’ve got to understand he has the heart of the Grinc… no wait… he has no heart.
There is NOTHING in the New Covenant that in any way gives license for his actions of rhetoric of hate.
Martha Thomases
January 18, 2010 - 6:42 am
@Reg: This is fun! Here’s more we can agree on:
• Children should be loved and wanted.
• Our society should value children as well, so that there are safety nets for those who have the misfortune to be neither loved nor wanted.
• This same society should value generosity towards others, not small-minded greed.
See? We can do this! If Mike Gold and I can find restaurants where we can eat together, anything is possible.
Reg
January 18, 2010 - 10:32 am
@ Martha… This is from me to you…. with apologies to Mr. Thomases…
http://popup.lala.com/popup/504684676487281856
😀
Reg
January 18, 2010 - 10:41 am
p.s. Hopefully we can exchange recipes at some point. I’ve got a couple of veggie dishes that would have both M & M looking for the bones.
Martha Thomases
January 18, 2010 - 12:00 pm
@Reg: To be fair, Mike exaggerated. I’m not a strict vegetarian; rather, I eat red meat only rarely. And also, I actually like tofu.
So, yes. Let’s swap!
Mike Gold
January 18, 2010 - 1:48 pm
Tofu? ?
Martha Thomases
January 18, 2010 - 2:04 pm
@Mike: What’s it to ya?
Whitney
January 18, 2010 - 2:44 pm
Martha –
Maybe the court is allowing a flawed arguement to proceed so that this guy can enter the penal system sooner than later? Am I too naive to assume that the judge is ‘all in’, willing to play poker and bet that the jurors will be wise enough to not sanction murder? But even allowing this position to be heard in the courts might set a precedent that is reprehensible.
Gotta agree with Reg: There is no Jesus in this.
Gotta disagree with Mike: Soy products have gotten a bad rap.
Alan Coil
January 18, 2010 - 5:36 pm
“Am I too naive to assume that the judge is ‘all in’, willing to play poker and bet that the jurors will be wise enough to not sanction murder?”
It’s Kansas. Little girl took a bunch of drugs, had a strange hallucination, came home and told an unbelievable lie, but they believed the story about her and her little dog, too.
Mike Gold
January 19, 2010 - 7:49 am
Tofu? I have a hard time eating anagrams.