Throw Arizona Out Of The Union, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #170
May 17, 2010 Mike Gold 0 Comments
Arizona has become the Ann Coulter of the Union. Except Arizona is a lot more harmful.
We know about Arizona’s bill that mandates President Obama to present his birth certificate in order to run for reelection in that state. We certainly know about its bigoted mandatory stop-and-harass Hispanic-looking people law. But perhaps you haven’t heard the latest.
Governor Jan Brewer has signed a bill destroying the Tucson school district’s ethnic studies program and prohibiting the establishment of similar programs in their state. State schools chief Tom Horne said he believes the Tucson school district’s Mexican-American studies program teaches Latino students that they are oppressed by white people. And, evidently, it also teaches students that big, hot yellow thing up in the sky is called the “sun.”
According to the Associated Press, “The Tucson Unified School District program offers specialized courses in African-American, Mexican-American and Native-American studies that focus on history and literature and include information about the influence of a particular ethnic group. For example, in the Mexican-American Studies program, an American history course explores the role of Hispanics in the Vietnam War, and a literature course emphasizes Latino authors.”
The bill is intended to prohibit courses that might have the possibility of raising “ethnic solidarity or resentment.” I guess they won’t be able to talk about slavery in Arizona schools. That puts them in line with those crybabies who resent anybody saying the “War Of Northern Aggression” was about slavery. And the war of genocide committed on native Americans – that’s got to be out as well.
It is only fitting that the whitewash of American history be performed by white people.
The United Nations condemned the measure, which will doubtlessly make the bill even more popular in what is presently America’s most racist and isolationist state. The U.N. noted people “have the right to learn about their own cultural and linguistic heritage.”
These people do not know what America is all about. They consider our Constitution to be outdated, the Bill of Rights to be socialist, and our founding fathers to be a bunch of left-wing pussies. It appears they do not know how to read, or perhaps they are simply too lazy to try, or too narrow-minded to ingest foreign cultures that differ from the foreign cultures from which they devolved.
I’m certain these… people… feel it’s just a coincidence that none of this crap was believed to be necessary under a white president. The Arizona fools and their Tea Bagger fellow travelers want America to “return” to being a country where everybody looks, believes, acts, and thinks just like them. A nation of scared, spineless bigots. A nation that never existed.
I, for one, will not be doing business with anybody in the state of Arizona. I do not take this step lightly as, by and large, I feel boycotts are counterproductive and usually wind up hurting innocents. But the behavior of the lily-white politicians who run th e state is so egregious I simply cannot bring myself to do anything that would support these jingoists or the un-American, inhuman pieces of shit that put them in office and keep them there.
Media metaphysician and www.ComicMix.com editor-in-Chief Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking bizarro music and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com, every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, replayed three times during the week (check the website above for times). Likewise, his Weird Scenes Inside The Gold Mind political and cultural rants pop up each and every day at the same venue.
Martha Thomases
May 17, 2010 - 8:25 am
This law punishes everyone in Arizona, not just the kids who now won’t learn about their heritage. Learning about other people is one of the best parts of education. I took a Chinese Literature in Translation course in college, and it completely changed the way I understood language and story-telling. If, in the process, it provided some in the class with ethnic pride, that’s good, too.
Rick Oliver
May 17, 2010 - 10:23 am
We fought a civil war to prevent states from going off on their own; so I don’t think we’re likely to start selectively kicking them out now. And among the many rights in the constitution is the right for states to concoct any stupid laws they want, as long as they don’t violate the constitution. Several amendments are devoted to states’ rights.
Unless the courts rule that Arizona’s disturbing new laws are unconstitutional, look for other red states to follow. As the economy continues to do nothing since there’s nothing much to do anything with, people will look for someone to blame, and easily identifiable minority groups are always handy targets.
A while back I got an email from a relative, containing some conservative talking points that he provided as “proof” that illegal immigration was the root of all our problems. It provided “facts” concerning how much crime is committed by illegal immigrants, how much they steal from the welfare system, and how many jobs they take away from legal residents. So, apparently while they’re not busy committing crimes and stealing welfare checks, they’re busy holding down full-time jobs.
The document also highlighted the supposedly vast amounts of our tax dollars wasted on deporting illegal immigrants. It was unclear what alternative to deportation the authors’ proposed, but they clearly think we should do something, otherwise they wouldn’t have gone to all the effort to “prove” what a huge problem illegal immigration is.
Vinnie Bartilucci
May 17, 2010 - 11:08 am
“These people do not know what America is all about. ”
Pronoun trouble – are you referring here to the people of Arizona of the UN?
Arizona is riding the front egde of the pendulum as it swings back to the conservative side of things. The Conservicans have take a number of reasonable complaints, wrapped them in nightmares and hyperbole and gotten people so whipped up about immigration that it’s showing up higher than things like “education” on polls about what people think the government should be spending more time on.
We’re choking to death on things people want Something Done About, but having no idea what that something should be. The result being is that no matter WHAT gets done, those people will be able to be convinced it’s the wrong thing.
I don’t think there’s a single person in Washington who gives a rat’s ass about the illegla aliens as people, just as a tool to be used to get re-elected.
Marc Fishman
May 17, 2010 - 11:31 am
See, it’s not REAL racism folks… it’s a DRY racism. As Rick notices, Arizona won’t become a country unto itself, and in the worst case scenario… “other Red states will join in the fun”. While I hold the belief no state is always gonna run Red or Blue, or Black, or White… I DO believe that as we continue to suffer from the mistakes the LAST people in power left on this current administration, the more likely people will start pointing fingers at anyone they can blame. Blame Obama. Blame illegal immigrants taking jobs that pay under the minimum wage that “gringos” wouldn’t do in the first place. Blame educational systems that promote heritage, and pride.
I’d like to blame the folks who drove us into a war over WMD’s that didn’t exist, and ran up a bill while their friends all got rich. I’d like to blame the right winged nutjobs that drove our government into a screeching halt the day the Obamas moved into the White House. I’d like to blame folks like Sarah Palin, Tea-Baggers, and Glenn Beck.
But after spending all my time finger pointing, and getting mad… have I done anything other than waste my time?
Rick Oliver
May 17, 2010 - 11:37 am
re: “The result being is that no matter WHAT gets done, those people will be able to be convinced it’s the wrong thing.”
Many people hold blatantly conflicting opinions/beliefs. There are those who claim to love America while hating the very concept of the federal government, apparently oblivious to the fact that the former would not exist without the latter. There are those who feel quite strongly that the federal government should stay out of “their” Medicare and “their” Social Security. There are those who demand better schools, better defense, more militant enforcement of immigration laws, and drastic tax cuts all at the same time.
Mike Gold
May 17, 2010 - 11:47 am
Martha — I think that’s the point of this new law. There’s only one culture in Arizona, and it’s Arizonan. It’s not “American,” as it has nothing to do with the culture of, say, Wisconsin or Maine or Oregon.
Rick — Fuck ’em. Toss them out. Screw the Civil War, let’s show ’em what REAL northern aggression is all about.
Still trying to find where in the Constitution it said states can’t leave the Union. Look, Lincoln was a nice guy and all that, and his heart was in the right place, but Arizona was part of Mexico until 1848, when it was taken over by the U.S. as spoils of war. At the very least, we should give it back to Mexico.
That way, Mexico can cancel their travel advisory against Arizona.
VInnie — I was referring to the great racist gasbags of Arizona. And I think EVERY Republican who’s looking to be reelected is going to have to decide whether to jump into bed with the Tea Baggers or take a chance of being the next Bob Bennett. Or, possibly, John McCain.
Marc — As that great American said, “Quid Me Anxius Sum?”
Mike Gold
May 17, 2010 - 2:31 pm
re: “Many people hold blatantly conflicting opinions/beliefs. There are those who claim to love America while hating the very concept of the federal government, apparently oblivious to the fact that the former would not exist without the latter. There are those who feel quite strongly that the federal government should stay out of “their” Medicare and “their” Social Security. There are those who demand better schools, better defense, more militant enforcement of immigration laws, and drastic tax cuts all at the same time.”
“You know, morons.” Gene Wilder, Blazing Saddles.
Rick Oliver
May 17, 2010 - 3:32 pm
re: “morons”
As I’m fond of saying, “The problem with democracy is that everybody gets to vote.”
They may be morons, but they’re OUR morons, and Fox News has discovered that their are a whole LOT of them out there.
I saw a bumper sticker on a truck the other day that said, “I speak English, and I pay taxes.” Clearly, if we all spoke English and paid taxes, all our problems would be solved, right? Well, at least if we all spoke English anyway…because taxes are bad, right?
pennie
May 17, 2010 - 3:53 pm
The easy way out: stir up nationalistic faux pride by singling out a “common enemy” responsible for social ills. Paint them as “furiners.”
A few examples come to mind: Native Americans on these shores.
Native aborigines in Australia.
Jews, artists, communists, homos in Weimar Germany.
Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan.
Armenians and Greeks in the early 1900s in Turkey.
Irish Catholics in Northern Ireland.
The Hutus in Burundi.
Jews in Russia in the 1800s.
The Kurds in Iraq.
Serbs in Croatia
The Ibos in Nigeria
There are so many, many more examples.
So now the Empire of Arizona is taking the easy way out. It starts with the finger-pointing. And I do understand that the death camps haven’t yet opened for business. So how will Arizona celebrate Cinco de Mayo next year? Replace margaritas with round-up on ice?
Leads to an interesting question: how many Arizonans would vote to sanction separate enclosed and guarded facilities for those newly arrested? Or is that Un-American? Kind of like the Japanese camps in the 1940’s? Anyone want to hazard a guess?
Mike Gold
May 17, 2010 - 5:15 pm
And today, the dipshit twaddle-brain in chief Sarah Palin pronounced “We Are ALL Arizonians!”
No, you racist, bigoted bubble brain. We are not. Just you and your fellow putschies. There’s way too many of you, but you are by no means a majority. Get the fuck out of the land of the free; your shit isn’t worthy as fertilizer.
pennie
May 17, 2010 - 5:26 pm
In Trenton, NJ–and other locales–they go the other way…
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/nyregion/17idcard.html?th&emc=th
Mike Gold
May 17, 2010 - 6:38 pm
Good luck. And I’m not being sarcastic. New Haven took a lot of shit for doing the same thing.
R. Maheras
May 18, 2010 - 9:49 am
Regarding history in schools, I think extremists on both the left and right have been disingenuous over the years, ignoring events that weaken their political philosophy, while focusing like lasers on events supporting it. But while extremists on both sides also regularly ignore historical context, those on the left seem to have embraced it with a maniacal vigor that leaves their right-wing foes in the dust.
Let’s consider the issue of the history of the Americas. According to leftist revisionists, all was serene in the Americas before the White Man arrived in 1492 (let’s forget about the Vikings for the moment, since their earlier attempt at colonizing the Americas failed). As the leftist narrative goes, Native Americans were one with nature and the environment — only taking what they needed, and living in peace and contentment. The brutal, evil White Man changed all of that, destroying Native American culture through war, genocide, disease, theft of land, and Christian religious indoctrination.
The truth, of course, is far different, and won’t be found in any leftist-crafted history book. The fact is that Native Americans had been warring ever since the day the first bands of people wandered across the Bering Straits land bridge approximately 16,000 years ago. Native Americans did to each other everything the left accuses the White Man of doing to indigenous populations (and then some) – and they frequently did it with a brutality that would make even an SS general blanch. Total war, massive land grabs, genocide, cannibalism, human sacrifice, slavery and anything else one can imagine was fair game in the Americas long before Columbus set foot there.
And there is plenty of evidence that Native Americans were not the benign custodians of nature leftists invariably depict. There are a number of instances where tribes or vast civilizations reached population levels so great that available resources were either stripped bare or could not otherwise sustain them, and the culture collapsed. There is also evidence that the extinction of a number of animals – particularly larger mammals like the giant sloth, wooly mammoth and Megatherium – were due to the over-harvesting by indigenous populations.
The reality of the situation is, prior to the 20th Century (and since time immemorial), land grabs, people grabs, and other spoils-of-war grabs by conquering nations was normal operations for almost every country, every race and every culture worldwide. It was also common to use whatever resources one’s culture could find to take care of one’s people in the short term – with little thought about long-term effects of overuse or over-harvesting. So historically, there were many places around the world that were totally denuded of trees, animals and other resources by civilizations of every color, religion and creed. In some places, it’s STILL the case.
So whenever the far left gets its knickers all in a twist because the far right is pushing for some goofy revisionist issue, I just have to laugh. After all, the far left guys have it down to a science, and they’ve been overtly and covertly revising history for the past 30-40 years.
Martha Thomases
May 18, 2010 - 11:04 am
@R: I’d like to see citations of those textbooks, used in public school classrooms, that describe Native Americans in such a way.
R. Maheras
May 18, 2010 - 12:52 pm
You don’t know how badly I wish I still had my daughters’ history text books from the 1990s.
By the way, my kids graduated from Highland Park High School in Illinois — yeah, the same high school that’s in the news because, for leftist political reasons, they banned their girls championship basketball team from going to Arizona to compete. And since I am still a taxpayer in that school district (about 2/3s of my property taxes go to that district), it’s a good thing for them I’m in Los Angeles and not back there right now, because I’d have been at the school board meeting they just had and I would have raised hell. This is the first championship for the Highland Park HS girls basketball team in 26 years, and denying those girls a trip to Arizona for political reasons is total BS. I think that whole school board (or at least the ringleader, who seems to always be pushing her political agenda) should be kicked out and replaced.
Martha Thomases
May 18, 2010 - 1:29 pm
@R: Re: the Basketball team – That’s changing the subject. You allude to leftist textbooks but don’t cite any by title or author.
R. Maheras
May 18, 2010 - 1:35 pm
By the way, when I said “history books” above, I wasn’t referring to school textbooks per se, rather, the revisionism or distortion in general leftists are making to history.
For example, if one looks at this Wikipedia entry for “Genocides in history,” note how the entire entry is framed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history
Wikipedia is now, by default, the official authority about history for many people — especially young, Internet-savvy folks.
But if you look at this entry, notice there is nary a peep about pre-1490 genocides in the Americas. As a matter of fact, most pre-1490 acts around the world that would qualify today as genocide are not even mentioned. Neither is any real historical context. So the average schmoe looking at this entry would think — in the Americas, at least — that the evil Europeans were monsters who ravaged a peaceful hemisphere. In reality, it was one warring part of the planet discovering another warring part of the planet, and then conquering it according to the warfighting norms at the time.
R. Maheras
May 18, 2010 - 1:49 pm
One other point about the Wikipedia entry: Just the fact that the year 1490 is a dividing line between hardly any historical entries about genocide and a huge laundry-list of post-1490 actions is a subtle inference that genocide pretty much started when those evil Europeans — you know, the “rich white guys” who today would probably all be right-wingers — discovered America.
Martha Thomases
May 18, 2010 - 4:04 pm
Russ, you’re changing the argument again. As someone who was a history major in college (admittedly, there was much less history to study then), I appreciate historians who have a point of view. The good professors are the ones who encourage students to read more, not less.
And Wikipedia? Really? That’s the new liberal menace? Didn’t Stephen Colbert get his viewers to change it so that elephants were no longer endangered? I mean, next you’ll be saying my opinions were swayed by Mr. Peabody and Sherman, because that was on television.
R. Maheras
May 18, 2010 - 5:07 pm
Just because you and I may be cautious of things like Wikipedia doesn’t mean didley. We went through our formative years during a different time and place. Wikipedia is the first stop regarding a given topic for many people using the Web, and, like it or not, it’s become a primary initial source of information for high school and college students: http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/03/most-students-use-wikipedia-but-avoid-telling-profs-about-it.ars
In this regards, Wikipedia wields quite a powerful punch when it comes to framing a viewpoint or thesis. The same goes for newspapers (and their errors galore) and popular culture (which make newspapers seem positively scholarly, by comparison).
There are two ways to lie to frame an agenda, philosophy or issue. The first way is to just go ahead and say something untrue and hope one doesn’t get caught. The second, and often the more insidious way, is to intentionally omit portions of the truth to give people a false impression.
That is how I think many historians today are pushing their left or right political agenda. But while extremists on both the left and right do this with equal aplomb, there are far more extreme leftists in education, the media, and popular culture than there are extreme rightists, so the left does far more lying, in my opinion.
My observation about how history is framed by the dominant communicators (i.e., the left) is no paranoid fantasy. I’ve been following all of this stuff for 40 years, and I know what is commonly portrayed and what isn’t, and I’ve seen very few honest assessments of the history of the Americas, and those were invariably buried in scholarly publications.
Was anything I related above about history in the Americas untrue? No. Is most of it common knowledge? No.
Why? You tell me.
mike weber
May 19, 2010 - 8:38 pm
Nothing in the Constitution says that states cannot leave the Union. True.
However, nothing says (as i believe it did in the Articles of Confederation that the Constitution replaced) that they *can*.
And, often, the general reading of the Constitution is of the “Anything not compulsory is forbidden,” school of thought.
Rick Oliver
May 20, 2010 - 4:33 am
re: Anything not compulsory is forbidden.
Actually, I think the 9th and 10th amendments exist primarily to prevent that kind of interpretation:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Mike Gold
May 20, 2010 - 6:56 pm
Russ and Martha: Well, my brain’s bit fogged from locomotion, but I share Russ’s skepticism about Wikipedia. It’s gotten a lot better, but it should not be used as a primary or definitive source.
However, I would be lying if I did not admit that my world view was indeed shaped by Mr. Peabody and Sherman. Which was produced by Jay Ward (the “J” in Rocket J Squirrel, Bullwinkle J Moose, Homer J Simpson, and Bartholomew J Simpson). Mr. Ward was quite a conservative gentleman — of course, that was as defined in the 1950s and not in the 2010s. Whole different type of conservative back then.
Seriously, Peabody taught me that history is not accurate. I learned this first hand in the late 60s when shit I made up would up in history books. I learned this as an American history freak who wonders why there’s so much earnestly written contradictory material. Peabody helped teach me to question.
And to own my own young boy.
MOTU
May 20, 2010 - 7:23 pm
Sarah Palin pronounced “We Are ALL Arizonians?”
That’s like Clarence Thomas saying.-‘We are all niggers…’ -and not thinking that’s a bad thing.
God, I never thought I would say this because because I so love what I do but, I need a vacation.
I just need to go somewhere put my fucking head in the sand and try my best to somehow get back to 2010, because I’m now sure we are living in 1950 in Mississippi.
JosephW
May 20, 2010 - 7:50 pm
At R Maheras: So, I guess you must be absolutely disheartened by recent guidelines that are being considered by the Texas Board of Education (the one that textbook publishers live and die to please) which seek to re-rewrite history so that the Civil Rights movement is virtually ignored, that neither women nor minority groups did anything worthwhile in American history, that Jefferson Davis be treated as the equivalent of Abraham Lincoln, that Thomas Jefferson’s role in US history be minimized (mainly due to his silliness over that “wall of separation” phrase which TJ came up with), that country and western music’s cultural impact should be studied (I’m not sure but I think that would violate the new Arizona school proposal).
MOTU
May 20, 2010 - 8:28 pm
Joseph,
I’m never coming home.
R. Maheras
May 21, 2010 - 8:51 am
Here’s my take on the whole Texas Board of Education flap:
Yes, I’m upset about some of the changes that are reportedly being made.
I must emphasize reportedly, because extremist on both sides tend to either embellish or omit information to frame their narratives. For example, what does “virtually ignored” or “minimized” really mean in the context it’s being used? Does it mean the subject is only mentioned in one sentence, one paragraph or one page? After all, there are some who may argue that in a chapter about, say, the 1960s, one page about the Civil Rights movement is akin to being “virtually ignored.” But considering how tumultuous the 1960s were, others might disagree. So specifics here are very critical.
Of course, being entirely dropped from the history books by the Texas Board of Education — as is reportedly the case for Isaac Newton, of one of the most important scientists in history — is a different story.
But frankly, I again blame extremists on both the left and the right for this whole controversy. Whenever the far left has the opportunity to do so in their quest to write/teach history, they emphasize the stuff they think is important, while minimizing or ignoring legitimate figures or events conservative think are important. So naturally, when the far right has a chance to reciprocate, they do so with overreactive vengence.
Personally, I think textbook publishers should write their own history books, and then let the market dictate which ones are deemed worthy of use. That way, the Dallas Board of Education can buy more conservative textbooks if that’s what they want, and New York City Board of Education can buy more liberal textbooks if that’s what they choose to do. Then, if the kids from a particular city end up being non-competitive in the workplace after graduation, it’s pretty obvious who is to blame.
Finally, I don’t think one state’s board of education should have the power wielded by that of the Texas Board of Education.
Steven Atkins
May 22, 2010 - 2:04 pm
@ MOTU – If you’re never coming back, can I have one of your cars? If not, can have some of the MDAHA (Michael Davis’ Asian Hottie Archive)?
Seriously, I would like some kind of contact info to ask your advice on something, please?