MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

I Don’t Want to Be a Pinhead No More, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise

July 24, 2010 Martha Thomases 0 Comments

Have you been watching or reading any of the American news media this week?  If so, you might be under the impression that a lot of important issues in our society are being handled in an appropriate manner.

•The leaking oil in the Gulf of Mexico is capped, and some people and even corporations seem to be stepping up to the plate to make things better.

A scam by a right-wing nut was caught and exposed.  The President and his administration were blamed for falling for it.

Lindsay Lohan is safely behind bars.

These three stories seem to me to take up most of the evening news.  There’s other news (the financial reform bill passed, it’s still really hot outside), but this is what makes most of the talking heads talk.

But then, watching BBC America, I saw this story. According to this, it’s quite possible that the weapons we’ve been using to fight in Iraq are causing hideous cancers and genetic mutations in children born since the war started.

Doing a little bit of research online, I found this had been a big story for months.  Clearly, I hadn’t been paying much attention.  According to my Google search, neither had American media.

(Quick disclaimer:  I might have been using the wrong search criteria, because I am an old person.  However,  neither Fallujah + cancer nor Fallujah + birth defects produced any results.)

I understand that American media gives more play to local stories.  I understand that American media, supported by advertisers, wants to air stories that end happily.  However, I don’t understand why either of those things is more important than telling us what’s going on in the world, and offering possible explanations about why.

I’d also like to know why wrong-doing, when committed by the wealthy and powerful, is so rarely punished.

Someone looked the other way when the oil rigs on the Gulf were inspected, or did a dangerously sloppy job, and that person (or those persons) should be in jail.

Andrew Breitbart deliberately posted an edited version of a tape of a speech by Shirley Sherrod, one so edited that it appeared to say the opposite of what she actually said.  He claims he didn’t know there was more, but he seems to have done nothing to find out.  In my day, this was called “libel,” and the person who committed libel would be sued.

And the weapons used in Fallujah, most likely by us, seem to have caused horrible problems for innocent civilians.  This, to me, would seem to be a war crime, and either the people who created these weapons and/or the people who ordered their use should be in jail.  There are people upset that their tax dollars might pay for abortions.  I’m appalled my tax dollars might be spent to give children cancer, extra limbs and worse.

None of these people are in jail, nor are they facing charges.  Where’s the outrage?

People who are outraged might be too busy marching in the streets in protest to buy all the products advertised on their nightly news.  It would be much better to distract them with shallow, gossipy stories which will keep them amused.

We are not.

Media Goddess Martha Thomases wonders why white conservatives are so obsessed with the idea of black racism.  Are they afraid that karma really is a bitch?

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. John Tebbel
    July 24, 2010 - 7:14 am

    This is a well known bogus issue. If you or anyone else thinks than anyone’s weapons are worse than anyone else’s I’ve got a patriarchal religion to sell you.

    There is an anti-American, anti-Israeli, anti-Semitic cadre at the BBC and this is their line. (They conveniently omitted the actual weapons they mean so you can’t find out it’s bogus for yourselves. It’s about “depleted uranium,” sounds dangerous if you didn’t bother to continue high school science through physics.

    Like I said. Total lies, including “and” and “the.”

    I grew up in a golden age where paid editors prevented well-intentioned median from going off the rails.

    Bah.

  2. Eddie
    July 24, 2010 - 7:47 am

    Maybe this is because I spent much of the week floating on post-operative Dilaudid, but I was reassured by the Sherrod story. The knee-jerk moves against her in response to the lie came too quickly, it’s true. But the reversals and the restitution of her reputation also came remarkably quickly. I’m actually hoping that this was not a teachable moment but a self-teaching moment for many.

  3. Mike Gold
    July 24, 2010 - 8:31 am

    The average age for network evening news viewership is now 61 years old, which is even slightly older than me. The way audience levels have dropped for the network evening news over the past 20 years as their audience begins to drop dead, we won’t have Brian Williams and Katie Couric to kick around much longer.

    And, hell, Alex Trebek is 70 so Jeopardy is in deep crap as well. I’m thinking the safest and least expensive replacement for 6:30 to 8 PM viewing will be reruns of Spongepants.

    Which, fortunately, has about the same news value as the network evening news.

  4. pennie
    July 24, 2010 - 10:07 pm

    Martha,
    You and me and others here grew up with Uncle Walter, H & B, then Dan Rather and his arched editorializing eyebrows and pursed lips…but that was TV news meant to augment a fervidly created and read daily press.
    Now…not so much. We get sensationalized sound bites…Mike makes the point about 61-year-old averages. Bet that figure dovetails quite well with the age of those who read a national daily like the NYT, LAT, WP, CT or even CSM…

    We’re news junkies, monkey and all…Most now are skimmers.

    The four tornadoes that have touched down near my house in the last week have had a greater immediate impact but trust me when I tell you that chemical pollution in the US has been responsible for more fetal biological differentiation in the last ten years than folks would want to know about. And that is so not on the evening news with Brian or Katie…

  5. Martha Thomases
    July 25, 2010 - 7:59 am

    @John: Actually, there is apparently some evidence that its the chemicals (not the depleted uranium) that are causing the problem. And I never said, or meant to imply, that only weapons from the United States are at fault. I think I’m pretty much on the record as objecting to all weapons (other than a barbed wit).

    @Mike & pennie: The Internet should be a boon to news junkies like us. One can read newspapers from all over the world. And yet, somehow, as a culture, we seem to be getting more stupid.

    @Eddie: Care to share your meds?

  6. Mike Gold
    July 25, 2010 - 1:23 pm

    Martha: “The Internet should be a boon to news junkies like us. One can read newspapers from all over the world. And yet, somehow, as a culture, we seem to be getting more stupid.”

    I don’t think that’s true. People have had roughly the same quantity of media throughout the past 100 years — people used to have a variety of local newspapers to chose from, now we have a bunch of all-news radios stations (on broadcast, Internet and satellite radio), lots of teevee news, and as you point out, astonishing access to most of the newspapers of the world. And maybe a local paper of some minimal quality.

    I also believe the quality of news remains fairly constant. Sure, we’ve got Murdoch’s News America racket, and much (but not all) of broadcast network teevee news is embarrassingly stupid, but 100 years ago we had Hearst and Pulitzer and the like. Today we’ve got the New York Post; we used to have the New York Graphic (my favorite) and the Mirror and the Daily News was hardly a testimonial to fair and accurate reporting.

    People will always be attracted to the sensational — even really super intelligent people like those of us here at MDW. One person’s Rachel Maddow is another person’s Maury Povich. The good stuff is there and it isn’t hard to find by those who want it.

    I’d love to be able to sit down and read four local daily papers the way I used to, but that’s because I was born 60 years ago (as of August 4th). Today, not even New York City has four local daily papers — and I argue that the Times is a national paper like the Wall Street Journal and USA Today.

    There are still a few two paper markets. Soon we’ll start seeing zero newspaper markets. Maybe USA Today will publish special sections for Detroit, Seattle and other cities that face this eventuality.

    As for all those J-School graduates: hey, McDonalds is hiring. Quite frankly, the pay is about the same.

  7. Reg
    July 25, 2010 - 8:20 pm

    The WikiLeaks situtation is gonna prove most interesting. And dangerous.

Comments are closed.