MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Sweet Charity, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise

January 28, 2012 Martha Thomases 32 Comments

There are four candidates left in the Republican race for the presidential nomination.  What have they done lately?

•  Newt Gingrich wants to colonize the moon.  He thinks we should use the resources of the federal government to pay for the program and pay for more freeloading government workers to implement the program.  I don’t know why it isn’t important to reduce the deficit at a time like this, except for the fact that he’s campaigning in Florida, one of the headquarters for the space program.

Or, as Dave Chappelle said, “Mars, bitches!”

•  Rick Santorum thinks, apparently, that rape is God’s way of giving women a surprise gift.  As he, it is a woman’s duty to accept.  Why doesn’t God give us the receipt so we can return it and get one we choose ourselves?

•  I hear a lot about how Ron Paul is great, and Ron Paul is a libertarian who wants to get government out of people’s private lives.  However, he seems really fond of states rights, which might keep the government out of the lives of straight white men, but not necessarily help out the rest of us.  And, as this gentleman observes, it’s hard to get behind a Libertarian who believes that states can define a human being as property.  Or, if I might add, a state that can nationalize my uterus.

• But, let’s face it.  The fun part of the week has been Mitt Romney’s release of his last two years of tax returns.  There’s been a lot of noise about how little he pays in taxes (under 14%), but not a lot of attention has been paid to the rest of it, and what this means. 

For example, almost all of his income is derived from investments, not from salaries, which is why his rate is so low.  The GOP likes to claim that it’s important for this rate to be low so people will be encouraged to invest in businesses and thereby create jobs.  Romney should be their poster boy.  How many jobs has Romney created with his wealth since he left Bain Capital? 

In a capitalist system, we can often tell a lot about a person’s values by how that person chooses to spend money.  In Romney’s case, he gave his money to people who actively campaign to deny basic human rights to others. 

Rumor has it that he’s not releasing older tax returns because he donated a lot of money in support of California’s Prop 8.  I don’t know if the rumor is true, but it’s believable, which says all I need to know about the public’s perception of Mr. Mittens. 

Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, did not find a way to use the Chris Rock quite, but she strongly suggests you click the link.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. MOTU
    January 28, 2012 - 12:30 pm

    WHAT THE FUCK happened to the separation between church and state? Why is that never a topic of debate?

    I wonder how Dick, er Rick…nope Dick was right. I wonder how Dick would feel if someone in his family (GOD FORBID) was raped by a black man. That’s not so outrageous as it may seem according to another presidential candidate,Ron Paul, 95% of black men in Washington DC are criminals.

    Sooooooo if Dick wins (GOD FORBID, GOD FORBID GODFORBIDGODFORBIDGODFORBID) the presidency he better watch those niggers criminals in DC they do so loves them some white women.

  2. The Liberal Frank Miller
    January 28, 2012 - 1:44 pm

    I say we send all the Mormons, rapists and Republican candidates to that moon colony to see how they get along in a tight, enclosed space.

  3. MOTU
    January 28, 2012 - 2:03 pm

    The moon called an said; ‘Hell NO!’

    BTW-‘The Liberal Frank Miller’ -LOVE THAT!

  4. Doug Abramson
    January 28, 2012 - 2:23 pm

    I think that Santorum is more worried about himself getting raped by a man of any color. When he starts talking about gays, he starts looking around like a squirrel worried about a hawk having it for lunch.

  5. Pennie
    January 28, 2012 - 4:57 pm

    All four Elephants running for POTUS should be rocketed to the Moon…Saturn…Hell…Uranus…colonize this!

  6. Tom Brucker
    January 28, 2012 - 5:44 pm

    Romney and the rest of the primary gang are creating jobs this year!

  7. Vinnie Bartilucci
    January 28, 2012 - 5:52 pm

    I agree with Newt on the moon thing. Space exploration results in jobs, a lot of technology that trickles down (you should pardon the expression) to consumer electronics, and also makes science cool, and can give the country the sense it can accomplish something again.

    Blind squirrels and all…

  8. Mike Gold
    January 28, 2012 - 5:53 pm

    MOTU, there is no right of separation of church and state. Not in the Constitution, not in the Bill of Rights, not in law. And we have at least one sitting Supreme Court justice who believes that the individual states CAN pass laws establishing a STATE religion.

    As for Santorum, his position on abortion regarding rape and incest victims, well, it makes sense. If you perceive the unborn (and, presumably, the undead) as children and not fetuses (check out my column Monday), then aborting ANY such being is murder. Therefore, Santorum has the most pathetic case of religious OCD since Tomás de Torquemada.

    Either that, or he’s got one hell of an investment in a coat hanger factory.

  9. Martha Thomses
    January 28, 2012 - 6:43 pm

    As far as children resulting from rape, I think I heard Ken Kesey once make a similar claim. (And if not Kesey, someone with equally good counter-culture cre.). It only makes sense if one considers women to be vessels that incubate future humans, not actual humans themselves.

    With technology being what it is, any human cell can be cloned into another human. Therefore, a haircut murders more potential lives tha a year of abortions. But that might inconvenience men, so we will never see those laws.

  10. Martha Thomses
    January 28, 2012 - 6:47 pm

    @Vinnie: I, too, kind of like space exploration. What I don’t like is someone who would spend money on the moon, but not on roads, schools, health care, job traing programs, etc. etc., while decrying the deficit and slandering government workers.

  11. David Oakes
    January 28, 2012 - 7:44 pm

    When your religion is based on an Angel telling your Matriarch “Guess what, you’re pregnant!”, it is easy to see how Santorum might dismiss the circumstances of conception.

  12. David Oakes
    January 28, 2012 - 7:48 pm

    And it is already irreligious to “spill your seed upon the ground”. And no, we don’t see those laws either.

  13. Mike Gold
    January 28, 2012 - 7:53 pm

    That line always confused me. There are SO many ways I’ve spilled my seed on the ground. And if “ground” includes “sand,” even more so.

    Too much information?

    Hey, what if you spread your seed on mixed fibers?

  14. Reg
    January 28, 2012 - 10:33 pm

    Ummm, guys? The proper context is everything with respect to the understanding of a matter. Both references carry weight from a cultural and spiritual relevance standpoint, so hit me up if you seriously wanna know the whys and wherefores of spilled seed and fibers.

    Real talk.

  15. Martha Thomases
    January 29, 2012 - 6:31 am

    Um,Reg: I will match my study of Torah and its context against yours and raise you some Talmud.

  16. Mike Gold
    January 29, 2012 - 7:38 am

    Reg, personally I couldn’t care less. I’ll jerk off if I want to, no matter whose book of magic thought says I’ll fry in their hell. Or whatever. Their reasons for their stand is as irrelevant to me as the attitude of Martians towards Ray Walston. There’s an overriding support for the concept of getting the government out of our bedrooms; the same applies to me with respect to religion.

    And that’s real talk.

  17. Vinnie Bartilucci
    January 29, 2012 - 9:22 am

    My argument has always been, we spend billions on thins we never use, and indeed PARY we never use, like missles. But the SAME Technology can be used to build things we actually WILL use, keep the same people employed, maybe more, and make us feel really cool. I don’t see the downside.

    OK, I’m lying – the military does not want its budget reduced, because men do not enjoy the word “reduction” used towards them.

  18. Reg
    January 29, 2012 - 2:33 pm

    Martha…I call. 🙂

  19. Reg
    January 29, 2012 - 2:38 pm

    Mike,

    Offer was tonque in cheek, bruh…mostly. I’m one that always looks to try to understand a thing, even if I don’t agree with said thing. Coz at least then I won’t be confused about a matter. Figure we at least have that much in common.

  20. Mike Gold
    January 29, 2012 - 6:42 pm

    Oh, at least…!

  21. George Haberberger
    January 29, 2012 - 8:08 pm

    Therefore, a haircut murders more potential lives tha a year of abortions. But that might inconvenience men, so we will never see those laws.

    That’s right, because you know all men are Pro-Life and all women are Pro-Choice.

    Google the images for the Roe V Wade protest in Washington every January. There are more women marching than men. Most Pro-Life people I know are women. Most Pro-Choice people I know are men. Men who would rather not be on the hook for 18 years of child support.

    The abortion issue is not now, and never has been, one of men on one side and women on the other. It is a gross misrepresentation to claim otherwise.

  22. Martha Thomses
    January 29, 2012 - 8:54 pm

    The institutions that oppose choice are run by men, specifically the Carholic Church, the Republican Party, the Taliban, etc. the fact that there are women In these organizations does not change the fact that the people in charge have dicks.

    And are dicks.

    I never claimed all men were anti-choi w, nor that all women were pro-choice, so son’t misrepresent my point. I bet most women honk their bodies are their own.

  23. Mike Gold
    January 30, 2012 - 7:49 am

    There’s no evidence to support the theory that women are significantly more pro-abortion than men. Sure, religious institutions and the poltical organizations that pander to them are “run” by men, but their dogma is so heavily imbedded in American society gender is irrelevant.

    True story. Shortly after Roe v Wade went into effect, I was on WBBM-FM in Chicago and I received a call from a highly indignant woman. “Aren’t you glad your mother didn’t abort you?” she asked. “Well, I hadn’t thought about that,” I responded, “but I sure wish Mrs. Hitler had thought it over.” About a decade later, I realized I voiced a popular argument against cloning

    I am pro-cloning, which makes me both pro-life and pro-choice. I infer most of those who are anti-abortion are opposed to cloning… Which makes them anti-life.

    I’ve also noticed that there’s a big return on the part of some of the Religionists to severely limit or ban birth control. Anti-birth control, anti-abortion, anti-cloning. The problem isn’t men vs women. Not in the least. I, a man, am not your enemy.

    Ergo, concerned women should only fuck atheists.

  24. Martha Thomases
    January 30, 2012 - 7:55 am

    @Mike: Or other women.

  25. Mike Gold
    January 30, 2012 - 8:26 am

    Or both.

  26. George Haberberger
    January 30, 2012 - 9:00 am

    …the fact that there are women In these organizations does not change the fact that the people in charge have dicks.

    The president of Missouri Right to Life is Pam Fitchler.
    The president of Illinois Right to Life is Bonnie Quirke.
    The president of Michigan Right to Life is Barbara Listing.
    The president of California Right to Life is Besty Powel.
    The president of New York Right to Life is Mary Wright.
    And the president of NATIONAL Right to Life is Carol Tobias.

    There are a lot more if you care to Google it. Some state organizations are headed by men by they are outnumbered by a lot.

    I’ve been is discussion like this in various blogs throughout the years and I always use the terms that the organizations chose for themselves: Pro-Choice and Pro-Life.

    Calling the Pro-Life people Anti-Choice is… unnecessarily antagonistic. If I were to reciprocate I’d have to refer to the Pro-Choice faction as Anti-Life, which I’m sure Darkseid would like but I’m not sure about Jack Kirby.

  27. Martha Thomases
    January 30, 2012 - 9:45 am

    And Herman Cain was CEO of Godfather’s Pizza, but that doesn’t mean the fast food pizza business is run by African Americans.

  28. Mike Gold
    January 30, 2012 - 11:49 am

    George — And let us not neglect Phyllis Schlafly, the woman who frightened other women with the fear of unisex bathrooms.

    Yep. No two ways about it. Republican women have it sewn up!

  29. Rene
    January 30, 2012 - 2:24 pm

    Abortion is a morally complex issue. I find myself tentatively on the Pro-Choice side, even though I’ve heard good arguments from both sides.

    The Pro-Life side would have more of my sympathy if they didn’t give off the vibe they’re only against abortion because they want to turn back the clock on the sex revolution and get womankind back to a more traditional role. According to the Catholic Church, condoms are more lethal than atomic bombs. So I might be a little reluctant to let THOSE people lecture me on human reproduction.

    My therapist is one of the few Pro-Lifers that gave me pause and made me think. She is very much a Liberal, very open-minded, she isn’t following some pre-modern religious agenda, and she certainly isn’t the kind that thinks a woman’s place is as a housewife tending to her kids.

    But she told me that a surprisingly large number of women who have abortions here in Brazil are poor and uneducated, and many times pressured into it by their boyfriends or by their parents. Not exactly an informed choice.

  30. Martha Thomses
    January 30, 2012 - 2:57 pm

    @Rene: here in the United States, the pro-choice argument is usually framed by its proponents as a question about who should control a woman’s body – the woman herself or anybody else.

    A friend of mine was sterilized against her will in the 1960s . She had just given birth to her fourth child, and her doctor decided that was enough, so he tied her tubes while she was drugged. To me, that is just as vile as forced childbirth.

  31. George Haberberger
    January 30, 2012 - 3:33 pm

    The Pro-Life side would have more of my sympathy if they didn’t give off the vibe they’re only against abortion because they want to turn back the clock on the sex revolution and get womankind back to a more traditional role.

    Well that’s not the vibe I get from them at all and the prevalence of mostly women in the movement supports that.

    But thanks for at least considering both views.

  32. Martha Thomases
    January 30, 2012 - 3:43 pm

    >Well that’s not the vibe I get from them at all and the prevalence of mostly women in the movement supports that.>

    I sti;; do not believe this. Again, Catholic Church, Republican Party, Taliban et al.

Comments are closed.