Bigger and Dumber Than Ever, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #330 | @MDWorld
June 17, 2013 Mike Gold 20 Comments
Last week, daughter Adriane and I found ourselves driving up the BQE alongside New York City’s East River. It was about 1:00 AM and we had a clear, unobstructed and beautiful view of the Statue of Liberty, the new Freedom Tower (a first for me), and the Manhattan skyline. It was truly inspiring.
And so is this.
According to The Washington Post, Arizona Republican Congressman Trent Franks refuted a proposed amendment to his measure banning abortions after 20 weeks to make exceptions for rape and incest. His statement: “Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject – because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low… But when you make that exception, there’s usually a requirement to report the rape within 48 hours. And in this case that’s impossible because this is in the sixth month of gestation. And that’s what completely negates and vitiates the purpose for such an amendment.”
Let’s put aside the fact that this is bullshit and that even if it wasn’t, it shouldn’t matter. Let’s focus on the response former Missouri Republican Congressman Todd Akin after he said women can psychologically prevent pregnancy from occurring after a “legitimate rape.” Let us note the word “former.” And let us appreciate just how Representative Franks confuses stupidity for courage.
In fact, according to the same Post piece, a 2011 study from San Francisco State University found young women in Columbia “who have experienced sexual violence report significantly higher levels of unintended pregnancy … compared to those who have not experienced sexual violence.”
There are two possible sources for Franks’ statement, and they are not mutually exclusive. The first is that he pulled it out of his ass. The second is that Franks is so gullible he believes anything told to him by anyone who is to the right of Sean Hannity. Either way, he’s as dumb as a bag of cold dog turds.
The GOP continues its War on Science by making stuff up and selectively bible-sourcing their absurd claims as “evidence.” (I can hardly wait until they read the parts about slavery.) Every weapon used on the battlefield, including our military personnel, is based upon science. So perhaps the first fatality in their War on Science should be our military budget. Personally I don’t subscribe to that, but I do subscribe to sundry other scientific principles commonly accepted by people who do not wear holy tin foil on their heads: evolution, biology, ecology, mathematics, gravity…
The Republicans keep on moaning about how their problem is that they can’t get their righteous message out through the “lamestream media” and if only they could, all Americans, including women, blacks, Latinos, and gays, would see the glory of their mission. This, my friends, betrays the true dumbness of the Republican Party, which has long been interchangeable with the so-called Tea Party.
The Republican Party’s message has been getting out there just fine.
Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com, every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week – check the website above for times and streaming information. Gold also joins MDW’s Marc Alan Fishman, Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.
Rick Oliver
June 17, 2013 - 11:41 am
It’s just another case of either intentionally using statistics to mislead or failure to grasp simple statistical concepts.
Let’s say the rate of pregnancy from rape is 5% — or if we want to make it sound really low, let’s express it as a proportion: 0.05. Wow! That’s really low! Isn’t it? Well, not exactly, since it’s roughly the same as the rate of pregnancy from unprotected consensual sex. In other words, it’s roughly the same as the rate of pregnancy among women who are trying to get pregnant.
Mike Gold
June 17, 2013 - 12:44 pm
Which poses an interesting question. Is it better to elect a stupid person, or a devout hater?
Rick Oliver
June 17, 2013 - 2:03 pm
They are, unfortunately, not mutually exclusive categories, and I suspect there’s a high positive correlation between the two.
Neil C.
June 17, 2013 - 5:08 pm
But….Chicago Democrats, don’t cha know….
Mike Gold
June 17, 2013 - 5:23 pm
That’s still a redundancy, Neil. Even though the Republicans were so embarrassed at losing each and every mayoral election since 1931 they made the election non-partisan, with candidates not running under party affiliations. So Chicagoans voted en masse for a guy named “Daley.”
Neil C.
June 17, 2013 - 8:46 pm
Mike,
Just being sarcastic….because that response would be inevitable from other sources.
Mike Gold
June 17, 2013 - 8:49 pm
Yeah, but it’ll take any shot I can to tell a wacky Chicago pol story!
Neil C.
June 18, 2013 - 6:10 am
It’s your column, you can do anything you want. 🙂
Mike Gold
June 18, 2013 - 7:12 am
Ah! You’ve notices!
Whitney
June 18, 2013 - 10:23 am
I had a dog breeder tell me once that when you breed a bitch – if she feels unsafe in the environment – her body will absorb or miscarry any pups.
Maybe this is where the confusion about women who are raped comes in.
I may be called a ‘you know’, but I am not a dog. NOT that I have anything against dogs.
Mike Gold
June 18, 2013 - 11:14 am
Or wolves.
I chuckled at your confusion line, and then I thought, “well, gee-whiz, that really could be right.”
Bigger and dumber than ever.
George Haberberger
June 18, 2013 - 12:53 pm
I have heard for that couples who are having trouble conceiving are told by doctors to relax because stress has a negative effect on conception.
From Web MD: “Pregnancy was much more likely to occur during months when couples reported feeling “good” — happy and relaxed. It was less likely to occur during the months they reported feeling tense or anxious.
http://www.webmd.com/infertility-and-reproduction/features/infertility-stress
Mike, I wish you had provided a link to that study from the San Francisco University about women in Columbia.
What was it that Trent Franks said that was bullshit? That “the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low”? According to the Guttmacher Institute rape accounts for 1% of reason women seek abortions and incest accounts for <.5%.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf
Since his amendment intends to ban abortions after 20 weeks, it does seem that a rape exception would not be necessary since such a crime certainly would have been reported well before 6 months had passed.
Mike Gold
June 18, 2013 - 1:08 pm
Yep. And some doctors think kids should be born underwater in a swimming pool. Others think home delivery is the way to go. Some think pain medication is awful. Still others think the birthing chamber should be filled with Mozart. And I suppose others chose Wagner.
And what’s a Guttmacher Institute? I’ll avoid the obvious joke, just ‘cuz I wanna try something different for a change.
The amendment is unconstitutional. If passed, it won’t fly. You’re not going to chop away at women’s rights this way, so sell off all your wire hanger stock. You’re not creating lives here, you’re just killing pregnant women.
OK. Trying something different only lasts so long…
George Haberberger
June 18, 2013 - 1:59 pm
If you want to think that the Guttmacher Institute is biased, I admit it probably is.
From Wikipedia: “The Guttmacher Institute in 1968 was founded as the Center for Family Planning Program Development, a semi-autonomous division of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. The Center was renamed in memory of Alan Frank Guttmacher, an Ob/Gyn and former president of Planned Parenthood, and the Guttmacher Institute became an independent, non-profit corporation in 1977.”
I wasn’t implying there was a consensus among doctors about delivering a baby. Quite the opposite actually. Same with conception. Akin was wrong, (and he admitted it), that a woman could consciously and purposefully prevent conception. But to imply that stress in not a factor is also wrong.
The amendment is unconstitutional. If passed, it won’t fly. You’re not going to chop away at women’s rights this way, so sell off all your wire hanger stock.
What right is that? The one based on the non-existent right to privacy?
Once again, I ask the general public: Show me where in the Constitution it says I have any right to privacy.
https://mdwp.malibulist.com/2013/06/ill-be-seeing-you-by-martha-thomases-brilliant-disguise-mdworld/#more-8248
So… no link to that study?
Mike Gold
June 18, 2013 - 2:09 pm
Whomever made that crack was absolutely correct. The Constitution does not detail or imply any right to privacy. He’s one smart bastard.
It was the Supreme Court, like it or not (stupid of me; of course you don’t like it; on the other hand, I do) established a specific right to privacy. That makes it law. Federal law. Just like the Constitution. Just like the Supreme Court bestowed humanity upon corporations, like it or not (I don’t). Just like the Supreme Court said making Americans prove their citizenship at the time of voter registration is unconstitutional, which automatically voids laws in several states and attempts in several others.
That’s how the Supreme Court works. And why does it work that way?
Because the Constitution says so.
George Haberberger
June 18, 2013 - 4:18 pm
Sorry Mike, I see now that the link to the study is within the Washington Post article.
Rene
June 20, 2013 - 12:02 pm
I’m going thru a process of spiritual awakening, becoming more and more convinced of the existence of the soul and God. It’s awkward how this messes up with a few of my lifelong political positions.
I think that, right now, if Brazilians were to have a popular vote on allowing legal abortion here, I’d vote “no”.
I also believe that, from a metaphysical position, a lot of the blame for the abortion in most cases doesn’t rest solely on the woman’s shoulders, but also on every single person that perpetuates societies where lots of people live in poverty and are put into the road to extreme decisions and where women are abused.
A belief in God is a belief that we live in an universe where we’re all connected.
I don’t think the high level of materialism in American society can be blamed entirely on the leftists and humanists. The dudes on the Right that worship the dollar or the gun or think that some rapes are “legitimate” are more distant from any true understanding of God than Richard Dawkins.
Mike Gold
June 20, 2013 - 7:24 pm
OK. Just as long as you don’t go Vegan.
Richard Dawkins gets to go home to Lalla Ward. He believes in that. And I understand.
Rene
June 21, 2013 - 2:02 pm
Vegan!?
I said I was finding God, not that I was losing my mind.
As for Dawkins, I didn’t know he was married to Lalla Ward. It’s weird, it seems all the “new atheism” guys are somehow connected to DOCTOR WHO. What’s up with that?
Mike Gold
June 21, 2013 - 2:17 pm
Regeneration.