MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

The Shrinking Army, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #355 | @MDWorld

January 20, 2014 Mike Gold 1 Comment

Brainiac 255 ArtThe latest round of budget cuts call for a 100,000-person reduction in troops by 2019. As expected, the Pentagon is whining that we won’t have enough ground fodder for enemy bullets in case we actually get involved in a major war that involves humans fighting one another on battlefields.

Our military culture understandably drips of history and tradition… but nostalgia is another matter. Nostalgia does not win wars. These days, the people who win wars are 17 year-olds in an underground bunker in Kansas holding game controllers that would be beneath Sony’s dignity. And those kids are being made obsolete by the even less-expensive squadron of 12 year-old MIT graduates who hack into other nations’ computers and wireless communications to fight the good fight with a more limited risk of American blood loss.

This is progress, and no, I’m not being cynical. If we’re going to put the next generation of voters in risk – and we always do – it’s better to do so behind a legion of Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots. Michael Bay movies will become an important part of modern boot camp.

Still, the Pentagon bitches. That’s their job. The Pentagon has little to do with the military and a lot to do with politics… and even more to do with bureaucracy. We would be left with a mere 420,000 troops. We don’t yet know whom we’re likely to invade between now and then, but the past 20 years have indicated we won’t need as many Sgt. Rocks as we will need Col. Furys.

Those without the financial or political imperative don’t necessarily share the Pentagon’s opinion. For example, responding to the question “is 420,000 troops enough,” American University professor and former high-ranking government budget official Gordon Adams told USA Today “Who else that we are going to fight in a ground war has 420,000 soldiers. Silly, really. Of course we can.”

Perhaps the more important question is, who’s got the better computers and the better satellite systems and the better computer nerds? Somebody’s professional nerds are going to win the next war.

There’s another consideration of some importance. Let’s fool ourselves into believing the 100,000 person reduction in troops would come down evenly between 2015 and 2019 and, therefore, we’d add 20,000 to the unemployment roles each year. By way of comparison, the number of unemployed persons declined by 1.9 million (1.2 percentage points) during the past year – I’m not going to play the “how many were people who just gave up looking for work” game because that has been a consistent issue throughout our history. Subtract 20,000 from 1,900,000 and, rounding off, you’ve still got 1.9 million unemployed. This does not appear to be a significant problem.

Perhaps the best way to deal with the situation is to go ahead and reduce our armed forces by 100,000 – off the top. Get rid of those military politicians and bureaucrats, keep the men and women who truly know how to protect our nation in a 21st Century war, and look at how we’re likely to conduct ground wars after 2019 and make our adjustments accordingly.

That, too, is progress.

Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com and on iNetRadio, www.iNetRadio.com as part of “Hit Oldies” every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week – check www.getthepointradio.com above for times and on-demand streaming information. Gold also joins MDW’s Marc Alan Fishman, Martha Thomases and Michael Davis as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com where he pontificates on matters of four-color.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Rick Oliver
    January 20, 2014 - 9:36 am

    But…but…what if Nick Fury has to fight WWIII in outer space? Have we covered that contingency?

    And while I think a future of warfare in which our troops aren’t actually in harm’s way sounds like a good thing, I am reminded of an episode of Star Trek…

  2. Mike Gold
    January 20, 2014 - 9:44 am

    That’s one of my favorite covers, Rick. Had absolutely nothing to do with the story inside.

    The idea of going over to robo-wars is preferable to using human fodder. But if you take that to its natural conclusion — natural to me, of course — then the ultimate futility of war is revealed. If nobody dies and all you can do is “smart” bomb the hell out of somebody, what have you accomplished? You don’t gain territory. You don’t change the political landscape, unless you send a shitload of Seals or Rangers or SHIELD agents out to assassinate all the relevant bad guys. ALL of them. And then you’re assuming these people you’re killing don’t have public support. And historically, the USA hasn’t been very good at that assumption.

    Which means the only tactical gain in robo-wars is the constant churning of the movie option.

  3. Rick Oliver
    January 20, 2014 - 10:17 am

    In the Star Trek version, a lottery chose a random selection of citizens to be painlessly vaporized based on computer-projected estimates of the death tolls from the computer-simulated “attack”.

  4. Mike Gold
    January 20, 2014 - 10:26 am

    Yeah, well, my solution is a bit more “Blacklist.”

  5. Rick Oliver
    January 20, 2014 - 11:25 am

    I only watch Blacklist because James Spader is in it. It’s a pretty silly show, but Spader is delightful.

  6. Mike Gold
    January 20, 2014 - 11:31 am

    Spader is absolutely amazing. And he looks great in a hat. Go know.

    Most shows like this one are silly. That’s how we can tell them from the news. Clearly, the show is written to Spader’s strengths. I believe The Blacklist was supposed to be called “The James Spader Show,” but the insurance company wouldn’t let him do the fall over the ottoman.

  7. R. Maheras
    January 20, 2014 - 12:35 pm

    We are at a technological crossroads that I think many military traditionalists aren’t aware of, or are in denial about. It’s a technological crossroad similar to the arguments military experts had about the future potential of airpower and tanks following World War I.

    In both cases, the vast majority of military experts were incredibly short-sighted and wrong.

    For example, most of the experts laughed when a few argued that an aircraft could sink a battleship — and even shrugged it off when a bi-plane did just that during a demonstration. Inevitably, this lack of vision led to the near destruction of our entire Pacific naval fleet by Japanese planes on Dec. 7, 1941.

    In the case of tanks, the military forces of most countries did not envision that tanks could be used in mass formations to quickly overwhelm weaker enemy defenses, or simply go around the strongest ones, and then pierce deeply into enemy territory. The Germans did, and their blitzkrieg tactics allowed them to easily defeat France in the early days of World War II.

    Today, I think the potential of drones, aka unmanned aerial vehicles, aka remotely piloted aircraft, is facing similar tunnel vision by US military experts.

    What do I mean? Pick a military target, be it a ship, installation, or strategic building. Could any target currently withstand an attack by hundreds of cheap, weaponized kamikaze drones that were suddenly sent, en masse, to take it out? Nope. Not a one could. A hundred of the drones could be incendiary, a hundred could be explosive, a hundred could carry disabling or poison gas, etc.

    Personally, I’d not only expand our own drone attack capabilities, I’d figure out ways to take out such mass drone attacks — before we get caught with our pants down, yet again.

  8. Mike Gold
    January 20, 2014 - 1:57 pm

    The high-tech option (and it’s really no longer an option) fits into our cold war MAD (mutual armed destruction) philosophy. We might scoff at such so-called doomsday weapons, but I’ll tell you, if Apple started making iBombs invasion forces would think twice.

    And, before somebody else beats me to it (I’m guessing Rick), it was Doctor Strangelove who told the Soviet ambassador “Of course, the whole point of a Doomsday Machine is lost if you keep it a secret!”

  9. Rick Oliver
    January 20, 2014 - 2:29 pm

    Darn. You stole my line.

    But now I’m worried about the mine shaft gap.

  10. Mike Gold
    January 20, 2014 - 2:52 pm

    If our next war is fought by tech wizards in West Virginia mineshafts, we’re screwed. Purity of Essence, indeed.

  11. Whitney
    January 20, 2014 - 5:36 pm

    Oh Yuri, please don’t be upset…

Comments are closed.