MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

A Plague On Both Your Houses, by Mike Gold – Brainiac On Banjo #379 | @MDWorld

September 24, 2014 Mike Gold 5 Comments

Brainiac Art 379If you were to conduct a survey that tried to determine which groups of people are the most hated right now, you’d doubtlessly select “Muslims” for that vaunted “11,” right?

You would be correct, but for you Jews out there, never fear. You’re still an “11.” The Czar retired that jersey number for you-all a long, long time ago.

As it turns out, acts against Jews and Muslims seem to be reaching a post-WWII height. Go know, as they say in Hymietown. You’d think that with the Muslims targeted as part of our 9-11 paranoia, they’d have a solid lead. You’d think that, with almost all American politicians supporting Israel and even the Tea Party using support for the Jewish State as part of their lengthy litmus test, American Jews could bask a bit in the nurturing spotlight of support.

 

And you’d be wrong. So-called hate crimes against both groups have skyrocketed in the past several months. Even in Hymietown, hate crimes against these two groups have more than doubled this year.

Let’s start with Pat Robertson. Sure, the guy is older than Methuselah, but his views and values haven’t changed much since he ran for President back in 1988. He’s still on teevee all the time as host of The 700 Club, one of the very few shows to be on the air longer than The Simpsons. A former Southern Baptist minister and the son of a United States senator, last week Pat made the following comment on this show: There is a left-wing radical named Mikey Weinstein who has gotten a group about “people against religion” or whatever he calls it and he has just terrorized the Armed Forces. You think you’re supposed to be tough, you’re supposed to defend us, and you’ve got one little Jewish radical who is scaring the pants off of you.

Wow. There’s a lot going on there. First of all, Mikey Weinstein is not in a group called “people against religion.” He’s with a group called “the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.” Whereas he, like me, has a Jewy surname, he’s actually advocating for a constitutional position that promotes atheism and not anti-theism, a substantial difference that is beyond the ken of many religionists. What Mr. Weinstein and the group to which he belongs are trying to do is to make the words

“so help me god” optional in the Air Force’s oath of enlistment.

Optional means wannabes don’t have to pledge to any hoary thunderer or cosmic muffin while they’re pledging their lives to their nation to protect us all and defend the very constitution that claims to promote religious freedom. If you want to, fine. If you don’t want to, fine. Your service should not be dependent upon your belief structure. Where’s the beef?

And why does he conflate Jewishness and an atheist position? Jews, atheists… evidently there’s no difference in Pat’s rattling brainpan.

Now let’s take the case of Robert Ransdell, a coordinator for the Cincinnati-based National Alliance, which, by the way, is a Neo-Nazi group. He’s a write-in candidate in this year’s Kentucky senatorial campaign running against Republican Mitch McConnell and Alison Lundergan Grimes.

Personally, I wish him well. I figure that – hanging chads aside – every vote for Ransdell is a vote against Creepy McConnell, the living embodiment of Willoughby the Dog. But even Ransdell admits he doesn’t have a prayer of winning. He’s just trying to get his white supremacist philosophies out in the open. That must be why he chose the snappy catchphrase “With Jews We Lose.”

Well, heck, I’m all in favor of standing up and being counted. But while you’re standing, Pat and Rob, you might as well go all the way and do that straight-armed salute that the Nazi’s think is such good stage direction. I prefer seeing the enemy coming, so let them call a schnozzle a schnozzle.

Some good can come out of this. Some Jews and some Muslims just might realize they’re all in the same boat… and that boat’s on fire.

A tip of the skullcap to Rob Reiner, Christopher Guest, Michael McKean and Harry Shearer for giving us perhaps the most enduring metaphor in the past 30 years, the one I noted in my lead paragraph. It’s about time somebody thanked these guys for that.

And while I’m at it, Willoughby the Dog is the creation of Tex Avery for the Warner Bros. cartoon Of Fox and Hounds, voiced, of course, by Mel Blanc. Has anybody ever seen Mel Blanc and Mitch O’Connell together?

Mike Gold performs the weekly two-hour Weird Sounds Inside The Gold Mind ass-kicking rock, blues and blather radio show on The Point, www.getthepointradio.com and on iNetRadio, www.iNetRadio.com as part of “Hit Oldies” every Sunday at 7:00 PM Eastern, rebroadcast three times during the week – check www.getthepointradio.com above for times and on-demand streaming information. Gold also joins MDWs Marc Alan Fishman and Martha Thomases as a weekly columnist at www.comicmix.com

where he pontificates on matters of four-color.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. Mindy Newell
    September 25, 2014 - 8:37 am

    The actor Richard Dreyfuss gave a speech a few years ago (unfortunately I don’t remember to which group, perhaps B’nai Brith or the Anti-Defamation League?) in which he reminded all us Jews that the main reason the crazy Christian right loves Israel and all us Jews is that, according to their interpretation of biblical prophecies, there will be 144,000 Jews left in the world after the Tribulation and that these Jews will herald the return of Jesus, who will return to smite the Anti-Christ.

    Then, after we Jews help Jesus destroy the Anti-Christ, he will throw us into the pits of hell, where we will burn in a pool of blood for all eternity.

    Oy ve.

    Oy Ve!

  2. Rene
    September 25, 2014 - 11:13 am

    Mikey Weinstein isn’t an atheist (he self-identifies as a Jewish Agnostic), and the Military Religious Freedom Foundation doesn’t actually promotes atheism (it promotes freedom of religion in the military).

    I’m personally dismayed by how religious debate in our times has degenerated into a binary war of Conservative Evangelicals against Activist Atheists, and you apparently has to choose only among those two sides. Thanks, but I don’t want Pat Robertson and I don’t want Richard Dawkins either.

    So yeah, I can see how people can lump Weinstein and the MRFF with the “atheists”.

    You can also add to that the fact that Jews have historically been blamed for introducing irony and irreverence that have eroded all those things “real men” love, including war and the military. That was an angle that the Nazis actually used, by the way.

  3. R. Maheras
    September 25, 2014 - 8:50 pm

    I used to sympathize with Weinstein until he went off the rails.

    The oath issue was just an easy target of opportunity that popped up, and he threw his hat in the ring. It reminded me of the latter days of WW II, when the Russians declared war on Japan when the war in the Pacific was just about over. Weinstein didn’t do the heavy lifting on this issue — the Appignani Humanist Legal Center did — and the situation would most have likely been resolved whether Weinstein was involved or not.

    A decade ago, during his initial crusade, I think Weinstein had a valid beef, and he set out to right a valid wrong. No problem.

    But in recent years, he appears to have jumped the shark. Instead of being content with his past success against over-enthusiastic evangelicals, he appears to have become an over-enthusiastic evangelical crusader of sorts himself — of anti-religion. He is allegedly not an atheist, but whether he is or not is really irrelevant.

    The issue, in my opinion, is he appears to now be attempting to curb ANY public expression of religion in the military — even things that in the past were perfectly legal and acceptable, and, more importantly, are protected by the freedom of speech and freedom of religion portions of the Constitution.

    Forget the hype. Google and read his recent direct quotes. Read what he is demanding, and read the hateful vitriol he is spouting. Treason? Spiritual Rape? Sedition? Arrests and courts-martials? Worse, he seems to think there’s an evangelical Christian behind every bush. Hell, let’s have some Congressional hearings, wave a few lists of evangelical Christians around, pound the podium, and demand we root out these dangerous subversives from society before they destroy America. Geez! It’s Tailgunner Joe and the frickin’ 1950s all over again.

    It’s sad really. It appears he is becoming the exact same bully he warned us all against 10 years ago.

  4. Rene
    September 26, 2014 - 7:29 am

    Russ –

    Really? That is sad to hear, but not very surprising.

    You know, when people say “It’s okay not to believe in God,” I can’t agree more.

    But when people start to preach “It’s BEST not to believe in God,” they sort of lose my support. And usually, it’s one little step for them to become Evangelical Atheists.

  5. mike gold
    September 26, 2014 - 7:51 am

    Rene, it sounds as if you’re saying it’s okay to proselytize for the Great Hoary Thunderer, but atheists shouldn’t be allowed to express their opinions let they be perceived as “Evangelical Atheists.” Which, in my world, is the religionists’ word for nigger.

    We don’t have people running around the world forcing natives to convert to Christ. We don’t have people beheading people who do not believe in Muhammad. We have our opinions, and I’m sorry if some religionists feel that somebody advocating on behalf of an Invisible Friend-free lifestyle is provoking their silly insecurities.

    I am an atheist. I have opinions. I share those opinions the same way religionists do. Unlike all too many of my religious brethren, the vast majority of us are not trying to convert anybody. But, just as Jews and Christians wear promotional jewelry and dominate the media with their views, we do express our opinions and we have that right.

    And I’m not going to the back of the bus for any neurotic bigot who is so insecure in his or her beliefs that he had to marginalize atheists as “evangelicals.”

  6. Neil C.
    September 26, 2014 - 8:51 am

    Mindy, that’s why I just don’t understand why any self-respecting Jew can throw in their lot with the GOP, even if they’re pro-Israel since they don’t really want us around for any reason except to keep ‘their’ land (I’ve given up this point with my uncle, who’s slightly to the right of Attila the Hun). And, Mike, like you, I don’t understand why religious people are so afraid of dissent. Are their beliefs so fragile that if you said, “I don’t believe in G-d” their whole moral system will implode?

  7. R. Maheras
    September 26, 2014 - 10:24 am

    Mike — C’mon. You know as well as I do that in recent history there are atheists who have the blood of tens of millions on their hands. Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, the Kim regimes, Ho Chi Minh, etc.

    But, as I mention, Weinstein’s religious views are really irrelevant here.

    Tell me, with a straight face, how his current rhetoric and tactics are any different than Tailgunner Joe’s in the 1950s. And while it’s true that Joe was an elected official and technically had more power (if his peers let him use it), the only other difference I see is Joe was “exposing” communists, and Weinstein is “exposing” Christian evangelicals.

    As I said, he originally had my support. Now that he has gone rogue, he does not.

  8. Mindy Newell
    September 26, 2014 - 10:26 am

    Mike, not sure if I read you right. You know there are missionaries proselytizing Christianity In Africa (as well as Mormons–well, I guess Mormonism is an offshoot of Christianity. (And here I must say that at least these missionaries are “putting their money where their mouths are, as many are risking their own lives combatting the Ebola epidemic.) And of course, we have barbaric ISIS beheading, raping, sodomizing and just plain slaughtering anyone, Christian, Jew, and other Muslims, who doesn’t agree with their 4th century brand of Islam.

  9. Mindy Newell
    September 26, 2014 - 10:29 am

    R. Maheras, Bastard Joe was allowed to use his power to after so-called communists. It was called HUAC.

  10. Rene
    September 26, 2014 - 11:10 am

    Mike –

    I also don’t have a high opinion of religionists who think their religious opinions are the BEST for society.

    What I said of atheists, I could have said of anybody. I also think it’s okay to be a Christian, but it’s not the BEST possible thing to be a Christian, capisce?

    And I know it usually pushes the buttons of some atheists, but more and more I think certain kinds of atheism are really akin to religions themselves. Did you ever read LIFE OF PI? The book I mean, not the movie?

    The protagonist recognizes that atheists are “his brothers from a different faith, but still a faith.” I agree with him. It’s not the same as agnostics who just aren’t sure. The atheist performs a leap of faith when he affirms that God doesn’t exists: it’s a metaphysical position, it can’t be proven.

    And it’s even more like a religion when it’s followed by materialistism, rationalism, and what I call vulgar evolutionism (not only that evolution exists, but the concept that everything about humans can be explained by evolution).

    “Atheism is not a religion, the same way bald is not a hair color.” Yeap. But the minute you go around urging people to shave their heads, how is that any different from urging people to dye their hair blonde?

Comments are closed.