(You Better) Take Care of Business, Mr. Business Man, by Martha Thomases- Brilliant Disguise | @MDWorld
February 7, 2015 Victor El-Khouri 0 Comments
In preparation for another election year, our elected representatives (and those who would like to be) are falling over each other to praise the small business.
I like small businesses. My father started one with his partners (small in the sense that they didn’t employ more than a dozen people or so) and gave me a comfortable life. Lots of people in my family work for small businesses. So do my friends. On a national scale, small businesses provide the most new jobs.
(The flip side of that is that most small business start-ups fail, costing their communities jobs as well as goods and services. I know. I started a small publishing business that failed.)
I’m in favor of making life easier for people who own small businesses, just as I am in favor of making everybody’s life easier in general. However, that ease shouldn’t come at the expense of the greater public good. To me, this makes obvious sense. And yet, this is not obvious sense to a newly elected United States Senator.
You might have seen more about this story on Wednesday’s episode of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. North Carolina Senator Thom Tillson thinks that it’s wrong for government to force restaurant employees to wash their hands after they use the bathroom. To him, the free market should determine the issue. Let those restaurant owners who want to make their employees wash their hands use that as a marketing issue when competing against those restaurant owners who don’t.
In a perfect world, this might work. We might also have unicorns and jetpacks (maybe even jetpacks for our unicorns). In the real world that we inhabit, this situation would make a lot of people sick.
Okay, that’s an extreme example. Not politically — Mr. Tillson is a United States Senator, not some afternoon talk show host — but I’m not trying to argue that conservatives want you to get diarrhea from an E Coli infection. I’m saying that, from their own words, they put the interests of business owners ahead of the interests of the public at large.
Marco Rubio, another elected United States Senator, has a new book out, which he was recently promoting on TDS. Like many in his party, he is trying to figure out a way to deal with income inequality while not going against his conservative values. Mr. Rubio thinks that, instead of raising the minimum wage, the progressive proposal, we should instead increase the earned-income tax credit. He says the families will benefit without threatening the profits of the small business owner, which might encourage the business to hire more workers.
This was an interesting idea to me, one I played with in my head for a while. In the end, unfortunately, I think it’s just another government give-away.
Here’s the thing: For the purposes of this discussion, I’m going to make an assumption — that Senator Rubio’s proposed EITC improves the wages of eligible families just as much as an increase in the minimum wage. The working families are better off. The business owner is better off (because he/she didn’t have to pay more to the workers).
Where did the money come from? It came from the government. It came from you and me.
Who derived the most benefit? The business owner. Our tax dollars paid the difference between the current minimum wage and the proposed living wage. It’s similar to Wal-Mart and MacDonald’s and other large employers teaching their low-wage workers how to get food stamps and welfare. The owners get the profits, and you and I, the taxpayers, pick up the slack.
Starting or buying a small business is a risk. There are no guarantees of success, as this chart makes abundantly clear. People who take risks are entitled to earn rewards when their risks pay off. They are not, however, entitled to government assistance to prop up their profits.
If you can’t afford to pay a living wage, you can’t afford to hire anyone. That’s the free market in my world.
Media Goddess Martha Thomases would still like that jetpack, but doesn’t really need one for her cat, who doesn’t like to go outside.
Howard Cruse
February 7, 2015 - 8:05 am
One of life’s tasks, it seems to me, is budgeting to see in advance if you can afford to do what you would like to do. This goes for small businesses, too, whose proprietors need to determine how many employees they can afford to hire, with the assumption being that those employees will receive a living wage — that being at least the minimum wage required by humane legislation, and maybe more if they’d like for the jobs being offered to be attractive to workers. Ruling out poverty wages as an adoption may result in fewer jobs being offered in the short term, the fact that those employees who ARE hired will have more money to spend will result in more consumers being created for products and services, which in the aggregate will produce a snowballing effect of money pouring into the coffers of all businesses, large and small — without the necessity of families going hungry of being unable to afford good medical care.
Proprietors of businesses, large or small, who don’t mind dooming their employees to economic misery so that they can increase their profits on the backs of those employees are just being greedy, and hurting the economy in the long run with their greed.
Howard Cruse
February 7, 2015 - 8:09 am
Make that “ruling out poverty wages as an OPTION,” not “as an ADOPTION.” I hate auto-correct.
Sarah Byam
February 7, 2015 - 8:25 am
It’s been my observation that only bullies and greedy people get ahead … when we reward greed and bullying.
It is interesting to observe how much damage sloppy rhetoric can do. Deregulation and small government as a whole was sold to us based on the assumption that, unlike any other segment of society, the market was a place where we did not need to govern ourselves – or others.
Which is sort of like saying we no longer need seat belts because fewer people die in car accidents because – well – seat belts…
Sarah Byam
February 7, 2015 - 8:25 am
It’s been my observation that only bullies and greedy people get ahead … when we reward greed and bullying.
It is interesting to observe how much damage sloppy rhetoric can do. Deregulation and small government as a whole was sold to us based on the assumption that, unlike any other segment of society, the market was a place where we did not need to govern ourselves – or others.
Which is sort of like saying we no longer need seat belts because fewer people die in car accidents because – well – seat belts…
Mike Gold
February 7, 2015 - 10:00 am
These capitalist fakers scream “free market! free market!” as though they were junkies desperate for a fix. And that is EXACTLY what they are. They are capitalists who want complete freedom to poison anybody they want with their own shit. At least Sen. Tillson is open about it. He said, essentially, caveat emptor motherfucker, ubi est mea!
These pigs want a free market? Okay. Let’s start by banning — and I mean an absolute 100% ban — on capitalists receiving any money from the state and federal government. They want the people’s money? The lazy fuckers should work for it and stop squaking about how they can’t live on a six figure annual income while blocking a living wage for their slaves.
Either that, or these bastards should be forced to dress up as Beagle Boys.
I really like the food in North Carolina, but with each passing day that’s becoming the only thing I like about the state. If Senator Tillson were GOVERNOR Tillson, I wouldn’t even eat there. And this murdering bastard doesn’t have to bother with washing his hands. He’ll never wash his stink out.
Rene
February 8, 2015 - 9:52 am
“The market will take care of that.”
Funny how Senator Thom Tillson says it like he was saying “God will take care of that” or “The Faeries will take care of that”. These guys are almost like worshippers of Mammon, and the market is their God. THAT is the real blasphemy, greater than any Charlie Hebdo could come up with. Or worse, it’s essentially Satanism – the worshipping of an “incomplete” or “distorted” God.
Except when their worship isn’t genuine, like Mike noted. When those guys NEED government help, then it’s all “Too Big to Fail” and shit like that. Communism for the rich, capitalism for the poor.
Though a third possibility is that most of them are neither true believers nor hypocrites, but a bit of both. Double-thinkers, like in Orwell’s. They believe and disbelieve at the same time, whatever is more convenient for them.
Rose
February 16, 2015 - 3:35 pm
An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a
colleague who had been conducting a little research on this.
And he actually ordered me dinner due to the fact that I stumbled upon it for him…
lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thanks for the meal!!
But yeah, thanx for spending the time to talk about this issue here on your website.
www.eyejot.com
February 24, 2015 - 3:30 am
The pocket pussy hooks up in your telephone and also the person about the other end can control the
vibrations and sensations. Valentine’s Day will be the annual affair that sends everyone scrambling to chose the one token to display their love.
Pussy toy using The fleshlight didn’t break,
may well worldspacked into one fleshlight
texture.
They also contain extra water and therefore are covered which
has a silicone lubricant. Well, I have no idea of how things
ended up, but prior to deciding to know it, the revolutionary yeoman, had his shirt off, and
was sitting in your division officer’s lap.
?This ‘newspaper revolution’ changed earlier perceptions regarding
the Hindi press to be second-rate, excessively legalistic.
over (http://www.eyejot.com) tenga us Accrual
of GDP seems for being the only way out for such nations otherwise big investments on other parts.