Wedding Bell Blues, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise
June 12, 2010 Martha Thomases 4 Comments
The news coverage of the marital separation of Al and Tipper Gore is extremely stupid, even by the standards of the news media coverage of Al Gore. The facet that offends me the most is when commentators say, “Who would imagine that the Gores would split while the Clintons would stay together?”They say this because Al and Tipper shared a big kiss on stage when he was nominated for President in 2000, while Bill Clinton has a famously wandering eye (among other parts of his anatomy). See, it’s a way to say they’re all hypocrites, the Gores because they pretended to love each other passionately ten years ago and now maybe they don’t, and the Clintons because Bill might have sex with other people.
Are any of these commentators married?
Look, I don’t know the Gores or the Clintons. Even if I did, I doubt I’d know what’s going on in their respective marriages. If I’ve learned anything from being alive so long and knowing other humans, it’s that every single relationship between two people is different, none more so than love.
Sexual fidelity is not the only way two people show their love for each other, nor is sexual infidelity in and of itself evidence that they don’t love each other. Other primates are not monogamous. Having sex with only one person for decades may work for some people, but not for all. Similarly, different humans experience a partner’s infidelity with varying amounts of hurt, from none to tons.
Did either of the Gore’s cheat? I don’t know. Did they hang out together? It seemed to me, looking at them from the outside, that they had different interests. Al was speaking out about the environment and making movies and winning the Nobel prize. Tipper was castigating rap and rock music. Their children were grown. Did they continue to share the same interests? It’s possible that they care about each other deeply, but have different priorities about how they’d like to spend the rest of their lives.
I don’t know how the Clintons feel about sexual fidelity. I don’t know how much it hurts Hillary if Bill screws around, and vice versa. However, I do know (because I have eyes) that they both find each other fascinating. It doesn’t matter where they are, nor whom they are with, they each find the other the most interesting person to talk to. At the end of the day, that’s what keeps a marriage together.
This August, I’ll be married thirty years. I can’t say that every day has been a joy. I can’t say we don’t have the same arguments over and over. I can’t even say that every conversation we have in fascinating. However, I can say that, before I go to sleep, there is no one who’s opinion I care about more than my husband’s. Even when it’s wrong.
Martha Thomases, Media Goddess, thinks that if Californians want their government run like Ebay and/or Hewlett-Packerd, they are out of their minds. Oh, wait …
Mike Gold
June 12, 2010 - 6:22 am
Wait a minute.
Tipper’s available?
John Tebbel
June 12, 2010 - 7:26 am
I’ll take her home and make her like it.
Howard Cruse
June 13, 2010 - 4:39 am
When Eddie and I got together, we knew that relationships are experiments. The only vow we made was that we would maintain communication and wouldn’t break up impulsively or for frivolous reasons. The experiment’s still working after 31 years and we still enjoy each other’s company. So far so good.
Martha Thomases
June 13, 2010 - 8:51 am
@Howard: After I sent this in, I realized that, by talking about marriage, I was perhaps ignoring gay people. Thanks for commenting and reminding me that some parts of this country are civilized enough to recognize gay marriage.
Of course, after being together for so long, one realizes that sexual orientation has almost (a big almost, but an almost) nothing to do with why two people stay together. Sexual attraction waxes and wanes (and, fortunately, waxes again), but someone who is fun to hang out with is forever.