Rites of Spring, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise
March 14, 2009 Martha Thomases 15 Comments
Spring is about to be sprung. Even us concrete-bound New Yorkers can tell. The first sign comes from the Mr. Softee trucks. Although one has been parked at Sixth Avenue and West Fourth Street all winter, we now find lines of people waiting for that first sweet taste. There are notices tacked to street lamps, announcing “No Parking Saturday” because there will be street fairs. When the days get longer and warmer, New Yorkers thoughts turn to socks for a dollar.
It is after I notice these cues that I notice more traditional signals. Tulips and daffodils start to push through the soil (a sight I find oddly sexy). Trees bulge with buds about to bloom. Forsythia is the market leader, the early adapter to this new day.
The thaw is invigorating. More sun means more heat. As the snow and ice melt, long buried piles of leaves and dog poop are revealed – and not just visually. The sweet smell of rot permeates the air, competing with the constant smells of curbside hotdogs and urine.
While I’m not much of a capital-C Communist (I did used to live on a commune, so I can’t deny the lower-case appeal), I always liked the quotation from Chairman Mao’s little red book, “Let a hundred flowers bloom, and a thousand schools of thought take root.” Although I suspect he didn’t mean it this way, to me, Mao’s version is a more visually appealing version of the First Amendment. In the spring, it’s inspiring to watch the new greenery, and hope each new blossom might be a new idea.
What brings this to mind is the new (and final) issue of Special Forces, Kyle Baker’s brilliant series for Image. On the inside back cover letter page, a Mr. Douglas Evans, from Victoria, Texas, berates Kyle not only for his point of view on the war in Iraq, but his choice of subject matter. He says, “Why make fun of America, why not satire North Korea (where people are starving to death because of their dictator) or the Muslim world (where a young girl was beaten and raped for sitting with a guy alone in a car) do lies sell better than the truth?” (Note: this is the same punctuation as in his letter.)
Kyle Baker is not a jukebox. You can’t put in your $2.99 cover price and make a selection of topics, and expect him to produce. He’s an artist, and he tells the stories that inspire him. Luckily for us, his interests are varied, and he can do comedy, drama, long-form and short. If you don’t like Special Forces, you might like Nat Turner, or the The Bakers.
If Mr. Evans wants to see a comic book mini-series about North Korea, perhaps he should write and draw one. No one would stop him. If he can’t find a publisher, perhaps he could publish it himself (as Kyle Baker did for several of his own books, including the aforementioned Nat Turner and The Bakers). If his story was compelling to a large enough audience, he would break even, possibly make a profit. In our capitalist society, this is what the marketplace of ideas is all about.
If Mr. Evans instead chooses to tell the story about the Muslim world, where girls are raped for defying their gender roles, perhaps he will also consider the examples of women raped in our own country, for walking outside after dark, for wearing stylish clothing that a man might find sexy. There are thousands of women raped – and murdered – for defying social convention, and their attackers often get away with a slap on the wrist, or no punishment at all. As we discussed last week, the penalties are even less if anyone rapes and murders those who present themselves as women, without necessarily having the coordinating equipment.
I suspect, in this parallel world where Douglas Evans makes comics inspired by the rape of young Muslim women, that he won’t include my counter-examples. That would be his right. It would be my right to offer him this counter-examples to what I’m inferring is his thesis, just as it is his right to call Special Forces “anti-American propaganda.”
Kyle includes the news articles that inspired each issue. Perhaps Mr. Evans will do the same. If he can’t back up his assertions with facts, we’ll know his arguments are driven by emotions, not facts. If this were the case, it would no’t make them invalid, but it would make them less credible.
Let’s disagree, and let’s argue, but let’s not tell our artists what to create, or our seeds what to sprout. Let a hundred flowers bloom, and let it be Springtime real soon.
—
Media Goddess Martha Thomases hopes that the change of seasons means the job market heats up, too.
Howard Cruse
March 14, 2009 - 7:42 am
Nothing paralyzes my creative im pulses faster than trying to cater to someone else’s desire that my work be ruled by boosterism for “our side.”
Charles Crossman
March 14, 2009 - 4:39 pm
Martha – as always – you rock.
Handing Smart Cocktail And Toasting
LCM
Uncle Robbie
March 14, 2009 - 4:44 pm
My mother was an artist of incredible skill and there was no medium that escaped her. She created for the sheer joy of creating and discarded or gave away pieces more often than she sold them. She had many opportunities for fame and/or fortune, but she had no interest. “The problem with taking commissions is,” she often said, “it makes people think they get a say. They don’t. It’s my art, no matter who pays for it.”
Martha Thomases
March 14, 2009 - 5:27 pm
@Robbie: Exactly. You should get to know Howard (and you can: http://www.howardcruse.com/howardsite/whatsnew.html) == you will enjoy each other.
Martha Thomases
March 14, 2009 - 5:28 pm
@ Charles Crossman: Pour for me, darling. I’m busy being insightful.
Jim
March 15, 2009 - 10:26 am
I remember reading a review of Watchmen by a conservative (politician, maybe?) and how he was displeased with the subject matter of contemporary art, and how artists these days were so dark and gloomy and nihilistic. “Why can’t they write about rainbows and the Beaver family?” was essentially his argument for better art. His review of Watchmen kinda hinged on how dark it was, and why he didn’t like it.
Then again, he said Dave Gibbons “isn’t a very good draftsman” and thinks that modern American comics have been hijacked by Japanese artists. So I don’t know how much I’d give his opinion of art credence.
M.O.T.U
March 15, 2009 - 12:17 pm
Jim wrote:
“Then again, he said Dave Gibbons “isn’t a very good draftsman” and thinks that modern American comics have been hijacked by Japanese artists.
Jim,
How do i address that guys comment with the respect it deserves? How do I put this nicely-I know THAT GUY’S THE ASSHOLE OF ALL ASSHOLES. Yep-that was nice.
pennie
March 15, 2009 - 1:44 pm
One of the benefits of reading the columns on MDW is that I learn about the current comic scene. It is one with which I claim little familiarity.
Martha, you and many of the authors here give me a valuable weekly education.
I usually sit these comic-oriented columns out to absorb but am grateful for the opportunity and wanted to thank MOTU, you and the other contributors for your fine work. It does not go unappreciated.
Martha Thomases
March 15, 2009 - 2:19 pm
@pennie: Whatever you may or may not think of comics, you probably have an opinion about art, and artists, and why you do what you do. That’s much more what this column is (supposed to be) about than any actual comic book.
Although Kyle Baker is God.
M.O.T.U
March 15, 2009 - 2:23 pm
AAAAAWWWWWWWW, SHUCKS
Pennie,
You do warm a MOTU’s heart 😉 I’m so glad you are part of the MDW gang! Also as far as comics go very soon right here on MDW we will be premiering 2 more original comics they are called (DRUM ROLL PLEASE) Little MOTU and Negro Kitty…don’t ask.
I’m also going to restart the Fighting Five something pissed me off and I wrote a rant and forgot all about the fighting five. We would have stared the comics earlier but Mr.McCarthy’s comic is so bad ass we had to bring it up to the standard he set…dammit.
M.O.T.U
March 15, 2009 - 2:25 pm
OK Martha Kyle Baker may be God but I’m MASTER OF THE UNIVERSE!!
So there.
pennie
March 15, 2009 - 2:50 pm
@Martha,
“Whatever you may or may not think of comics, you probably have an opinion about art, and artists, and why you do what you do. That’s much more what this column is (supposed to be) about than any actual comic book.
“Although Kyle Baker is God.”
Me have an opinion? }’;>)
Art? I believe we share some common ground in thinking that art can be daring, unconventional, transport one; show one something one has never seen expressed in “that” way; make one feel any one or more in the full range of human emotions; shed light; offer possibilities, and so much more…
Why is Otis Redding an artist and the Jonas Bros…not so much?–let me count the ways! Try a little tenderness, indeed!!!!
For me, an artist may not intend it so but bears a responsibility–and I don’t mean to any one but her/himself–and that is to be true to her/his own personal vision. Can art be dishonest? Hmmmmmm…….
You gave me the highest honor last week by labeling me an artist. So here goes: why do I do what I do? Simple. I have to.
I know your column is usually “about” many things. For that I am grateful. But you (and now the others who inhabit this site) have provided me a real opportunity to learn about comics, illustrators, unfamiliar (to me) authors, in a forum that usually has so much provocative talk and info going on—it’s why I keep coming back.
And I have learned from you that Kyle Baker is God.
You, my dear, remain Goddess.
}’;>)
pennie
March 15, 2009 - 2:53 pm
@MOTU,
This room is real and comfortable, even when it gets messy. Thanks for throwing me the welcome mat.
You must be the Master of the Universe. You created this!
Me, I am not worthy….}’;>)
Russ Rogers
March 17, 2009 - 12:42 pm
@pennie, Don’t be hatin’ on the JoBros! For teen agers caught up in the Star Machine, I think they are crafting some fine Pop. They seem to have their heads screwed on straight and they aren’t afraid of making fun of themselves. I’m a fan.
They sure beat out Tony DeFranco and the DeFranco Family. (“Heartbeat is a Lovebeat” is still a GREAT song. ) At this point, I would even say the Jonas Boys are better artists than “The Bay City Rollers.” I’ll go out on a limb and say that the Jonas Brothers are even better writers, performers, musicians and artists than “The 1910 Fruitgum Company!” How many 3-D movies did the Beatles make? None. The Jonas Brothers have already made TWO!
When did Little Stevie Wonder go from being a Pop Star to being an artist? When did the Beatles? Popular success can give artists the platform and confidence to break the mold and actually create great art. The Jonas Brothers aren’t there … yet. I mean, not like Hanson.
@Martha, Kyle Baker is not God. Not unless he sits at the right hand of Todd Rundgren. But I did read on the Internet that Kyle Baker is The World’s Greatest Cartoonist, so that has to be true.
pennie
March 17, 2009 - 5:21 pm
@Russ,
“When did Little Stevie Wonder go from being a Pop Star to being an artist? When did the Beatles? Popular success can give artists the platform and confidence to break the mold and actually create great art. The Jonas Brothers aren’t there … yet. I mean, not like Hanson.”
Russ, I love your examples of pop/bubblegum! Prolific all…}’;>)
I know this is slippery but I’ll give it a go. It’s true that some of our finest musical artists start as popular performers before transitioning/developing into people who create lasting and meaningful compositions.
Dating myself, I saw Stevie in 1969 when he opened for Ike and Tina and the headlining Stones.Right then, it was clear he was way beyond “Fingertips, Pt. 2.,” and about to transcend “My Cheri Amour.” On the other hand, Tina ripped it up as usual but still had Ike the Albatross hanging around. We knew she could haul ashes with “Nutbush” to “Proud Mary” but unlike Stevie, her solo artistry remained in the future.
The Stones…well, it was “Gimmie Shelter” and would that new guitarist work out?
By then, the Beatles were fixed as artists. “Abbey Road” was chiming the death knell. The common thread here–the year. But, in thinking about it, although not hard and fast, the common thread is that these performers had each created established familiar bodies of work. Each were major influential groundbreaking artists, who were able to take familiar genres and push boundaries into uncharted territories.
I believe you understand your bubblegum/pop examples don’t meet these criteria. The Ronettes and Martha and V’s did but others failed
The Jonas Brothers? Okay, the Beatles released two movies in the mid-1960s and in their time the JBs have as well. And maybe it’s too soon to tell (TY, Bonnie).
But (and here lies more slippery hills), I chose Otis for a reason when I compared his music to the JBs. THE MAN was able to wring more emotion from one phrasing than most others in a lifetime of song. He’s far from being alone in that regard but it remains so rare. And maybe the JB’s will yet nail it.
For this girl (slippery again…), stranded on that proverbial desert island with an ipod limited to 10 “albums,” Otis would be right THERE. Can anyone over the age of 25-30 make the same claim for the JBs?