MICHAEL DAVIS WORLD

You can't make this stuff up, so we don't!

Life Gets Better, by Martha Thomases – Brilliant Disguise

October 9, 2010 Martha Thomases 0 Comments

Not Your FodderWhen I was in high school, I was miserable for long stretches of time.  As a midwestern Jew at an Episcopal boarding school in Connecticut, I felt completely isolated and alone.  Even though I had many good friends there – including people who remain my friends now, more than 40 years later – I felt that no one understood my frame of reference.  Even worse, I was dumpy and loud, and no one seemed to have the slightest interest in dating me, neither in Connecticut nor Ohio.

It got so bad that, over a period of a year or two, I attempted suicide a few times.  The first time, I’ll admit, it was because I’m a drama queen.  I wanted to be found, dead, and yet somehow able to witness the outbreak of grief and regret my death would cause.  Luckily, one can’t kill oneself with the number of over-the-counter allergy pills dispensed by the infirmary, and instead of dying, I was merely groggy for a few days.

The next time, though, I didn’t care about being found.  I “knew” by then that no one would miss me.  No one would ever miss me.  I’d be lucky if anyone, anywhere, would ever even notice me.  I could see no reason to go on living.

Again, I was lucky, and my attempt was inept.  I went on to feel better, then feel worse, and continue on that kind of roller-coaster ride.

Recent events have reminded me of these times.  There seems to be an epidemic of GLBTQ teens committing suicide (or at least an epidemic of news stories about them).  Although I am not, to the best of my knowledge, lesbian nor bi-sexual (if I have an inner lesbian, she’s severely traumatized and locked up tight), I do remember feeling that I was alone, isolated, and hopeless.

That’s why Dan Savage’s new campaign, It Gets Better, is so important.  In a culture that persistently tells queer kids that they are unnatural, an abomination, and unloveable, It Gets Better is a YouTube channel in which grown-up queers talk about how they got through the bullying and loneliness to go on and find happiness in self-acceptance.

Not only are the individual stories sweet and funny and heart-breakingly optimistic, but I was also thrilled to see a space that actually values young people.  So much of our culture considers them to be, at best, a valuable market to whom to sell things and, at worse, cannon fodder.

Which brings me to the next bit of happy news this week.  The War Resisters League 2011 Peace Calendar, Not Your Fodder! is now available.  This year, the theme is Counter-Recruitment.  You’ve seen the massive advertising budget for the military, promising that, in exchange for a few years of his life, the young person can earn college scholarships, valuable job skills, and the respect of his country.

If only.

Too often, we treat our troops as if they are as disposable as tissue.  We sent them to Iraq without adequate armor for themselves or their vehicles.  We deny them decent medical care.  We nickel-and-dime them on benefits.  We let them go homeless.

There is an enormous, mostly grassroots counter-recruitment movement in this country that provides potential enlistees with alternative information from the juggernaut of misleading statements and outright lies coming from our Defense Department.

Most important, by offering a different point of view, the Counter-Recruitment folks treat young people as valuable individuals, capable of taking in more than one point of view and making an informed choice.

Also, it seems to me, that one of the most important parts of valuing people is to keep them out of situations in which they’ll get maimed, shot or blown up.

Media Goddess Martha Thomases was delighted to learn from the WRL Calendar that, on the date of her birthday, the Jews in Warsaw began their revolt against the Nazis.

Previous Post

Next Post

Comments

  1. R. Maheras
    October 9, 2010 - 12:12 pm

    I was bullied constantly when I was in grade school — to the point where I had to run for my life, vary the exits that I used to leave the school, and keep my head moving in all directions (and far down the block) when I walked home. Why was I bullied? Simple… I was generally always the shortest kid in class, and I generally always spoke my mind. The bullying eventually stopped in high school for two reasons: My high school was more than six miles from my neighborhood, and by my junior year I’d started a growth spurt that took me from 4′ 11″ to about 5′ 8″. Because of the turmoil I experienced during the latter part of grade school, I can emphasize with those who are bullied better than many.

    On the subject of the military, we are diametrically opposed. In your short statement you managed to use almost every negative stereotype there is about serving in the military, so it’s pretty obvious to me that you’ve never served, and you’ve never talked in depth to a wide cross-section of people who have.

    On one hand, while I appreciate your concern for the well-being of the veteran, I can’t help feel that you look upon those of us who have served as poor, misguided, ignorant dupes who need the protection and edification of some higher, more enlightened parental power to “see the light.”

    The fact is, I wasn’t a rube when I volunteered to join the military more than 30 years ago, and as far as I know, alzheimer’s hasn’t yet kicked in and I haven’t regressed to rube status today.

    When I quit my union job in 1978 and took a 66 percent cut in pay to join the military, it was hands down the smartest thing I ever did in my life.

    Back in those pre-Internet days, it was far harder for prospective recruits to get information about serving, yet I still managed to review a variety of material (such as the ACLU’s “The Rights of Serveicemen”) before I signed the dotted line. But today, any prospective recruit has a tsunami of information on the Internet about the military at his/her fingertips — both pro and con — so the assumption by anti-military types that “if people know the ‘truth’ they won’t join” is absurd.

    The truth as anti-military types see it and reality are definitely NOT one and the same.

  2. pennie
    October 9, 2010 - 1:27 pm

    Thank you Martha for yet another heartfelt column. Young people are many things but primarily vulnerable in so many ways. Your own revelations resonate to the heart of the matter. Kids who are excluded, isolated, and feel lost and lonely could populate major archipelagos and islands. Size matters. So does race, gender, religion, culture, language, and most any other aspect of human life.

    For some kids, there’s just no getting out of it. For queer kids, they’re going to disappoint and anger a lot of family and friends. Turn familiarity into contempt. And these are people one knows.

    Oft well meaning “experts” spout stats but the reliability is questionable. How can they cite numbers of kids who have yet to live two full decades?
    Still, lacking reliable information about such volatile subjects as sexual and gender identity, the known number of queer kids who commit suicide each month and year remains staggering and a national nightmare. A disgrace.

    The recent outpouring of grief about the kids who have killed themselves from so many corners has come as a revelation to me. That so many strangers were so affected by kids who identified as homosexual says a lot about how far we have come. That so many kids feel so hopeless and committed suicide speaks volumes about how far we have to go.

    As you know, in April, my youngest daughter killed herself. She was 19. I am just getting to a place where I can even write these words. It has been a long road. One that has no end or comfort.

    What I took away from your column today was nothing new to me–words from a woman who values life above all else. Maybe someday, we will have a culture that values it as much as you do.

    Peace, sister.

  3. Martha Thomases
    October 9, 2010 - 5:29 pm

    @R: It was certainly not my intent to patronize veterans. To the contrary, I was pointing out the many ways we fail them. Our VA hospitals are a disgrace. People enlist to learn special skills, and are then denied the opportunity. PTSD is not recognized as a medical condition.

    Although I didn’t serve (that whole pacifist thang), I had many friends who went to Viet Nam. Some didn’t come back. Of the ones who did, some were never whole again.

    You had a different experience. I’m glad. But that doesn’t mean mine is invalid.

  4. John Tebbel
    October 10, 2010 - 7:35 am

    Anti military type? You must mean Dick “Still Dodging that Draft” Cheney.

    Martha is so pro military she gives a damn about whether or not craven greedballs send them to die by the thousands in the most miserable places in the universe.

    She is so pro military she’d like to end the flow of confused adolescents into the military who are just filing up the recruiting quotas. Or am I supposed to believe they’re counseling an equal number of inquirers that this just might not be for them? Or twenty percent. Or one person a month? Don’t the recruiters work for the United States of America?

    Is it our lack of patriotism that makes recruitment easier in a depression than when things are good? That’s a dirty slander on Americans. No. The last patriotic war in these parts was the Big One, WW Two. Since then we’ve had to sell geo-political bank shots to draftees and enlistees. When was the last time a movie star went on a war bond drive? Today we’d rather run a Wall St. debt swindle to pay to send tanks and airplanes to rust in the jungle. Just so long as Bush Sr. and the Carlisle Group and Shrub and his lifelong vacation can continue to make hay while the world turns to shit.

    Martha is so pro military she wants them to do what they’re supposed to do. That reserves should stay reserves, to only be committed in a dire emergency, when the Huns are landing on Fire Island, not when there’s a shortage of cannon fodder. The National Guard should guard the nation, not some miserable oil desert.

    Want to know the name of the tail wagging the dog? It’s Halliburton, et fils. If there’s no war, they’re not reaping outrageous, criminal profits.

    Oh yeah, the war party will call me a liar. And the war will go on until every last stockholder and plutocrat is as rich as Uncle Scrooge.

    I saw something, and I said something.

  5. Eddie
    October 10, 2010 - 10:54 am

    Dear Martha — I never thought you were gay, and I’ve doubted you were even bi. But I have always consider you queer. John, too. I don’t know Arthur well enough to know if he makes the grade. It’s about your attitudes toward difference — including the kinds of differences that might make people want to pray for your soul.

    And while it’s heavily evident in your attitudes toward sexuality, your queerness shows itself in other arenas.

    For example — you are not anti-soldier, or anti-military. War is just so nonsensical to you that you can’t imagine why anyone is willing to start one or join one. Baby, that’s queer. And it’s beautiful.

    I’m so glad you didn’t kill yourself.

    Eddie

  6. R. Maheras
    October 10, 2010 - 1:23 pm

    John: From your rhetoric, it’s pretty obvious you’ve spent way too much time on leftist Web sites.

    I’ve been around these “confused adolescents” for more than 30 years, through Republican as well as Democratic administrations, and your characterization of these young men and women is both insulting and condescending.

    John and Martha: Keep in mind this is an all-volunteer force that has somehow managed to sustain itself through not just the economic downtimes as we are seeing now, but the boom times as well.

    Potential recruits now are better informed than ever about the pros and cons of military service, yet they still keep joining. This drives those on the left who have skewed views of the military out of their minds, so they find all kinds of wild excuses why it’s happening — save for the real reason: The leftist stereotypes, as a whole, are just plain wrong.

    Regarding the whole VA care issue, it should make you afraid… very afraid… if you are a supporter of government-run healthcare for all Americans. Because that’s what the VA is. So all the problems of chronic underfunding, cost cutting, waste and mismanagement you’ve seen the VA experience over the past several decades is very likely exactly what you’re going to see with mainstream government-run healthcare. The whole PTSD issue was one of money, and you will see the same intransigence by the government to spend huge chunks of money on civilian care issues that threaten to burgeon the budget caps that will be established for each type of care issue.

    Like Medicare, VA care is better than nothing, but historically, there just never seems to be enough money. How bad was it for the VA? Just prior to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the VA was in a big budget crunch, and was seriously considering shutting down a number of facilities nation-wide. The two wars changed all of that, and suddenly the VA saw new money. Otherwise, for veterans around the country, a bad situation for health care would have only gotten worse.

  7. Martha Thomases
    October 10, 2010 - 3:40 pm

    @R: I misspoke. I was referring to the Walter Reade Medical Center, where our soldiers were treated in a facility that was leaking and unsanitary. In fact, my father is treated at his local VA hospital, and he’s quite pleased with his care.

    And I’m not saying that recruiters should be banned. I’m just saying that potential recruits deserve to hear from all sides, including counter-recruiters. If the military life is such a great deal, there should be no effective arguments against it.

    I’m not afraid for my side. What about you?

  8. R. Maheras
    October 10, 2010 - 4:41 pm

    I’m not afraid of counter-recruiters per se, just as I’m not afraid of both sides airing their viewpoints on the Internet.

    Here’s my problem with counter-recruiters insisting they should have the RIGHT to, say, set up next to military recruiters at job fairs or career fares: It unfairly singles the military out. Because just by the fact that such counter-recruiters are there ONLY for military recruiters gives the impression that there is something inherently questionable about military service.

    However, if counter-recruiters were mandatory for every profession at a career fair, then I wouldn’t have a problem with military counter-recruiters. That way, potential recruits for the Peace Corps, Wal-Mart, the New York Police Department or other organizations will have the opportunity for hearing the good and bad reasons for working in those various professions as well.

  9. Martha Thomases
    October 10, 2010 - 5:35 pm

    The No Child Left Behind laws require schools to provide the military with contact information for all students, unless the parents choose to opt out (which they only have the chance to do if they know about it). This puts military recruiters way ahead of Wal-Mart, the Peace Corps, etc.

  10. R. Maheras
    October 10, 2010 - 11:49 pm

    My understanding about the backstory behind that legislation is there were schools around the country that were providing contact information to civilian recruiters, but not military recruiters (just as some schools were not allowing military recruiters to appear at career fairs). As often happens in such discrimination cases, lawmakers felt compelled to make a law to try and even the playing field again.

    Here’s what the Department of Education said about 2002 legislation: “Congress has passed two major pieces of legislation that generally require local educational agencies (LEAs) receiving assistance under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA)1 to give military recruiters the same access to secondary school students as they provide to postsecondary institutions or to prospective employers. LEAs are also generally required to provide students’ names, addresses, and telephone listings to military recruiters, when requested.”

    It’s a matter of fairness… not special privilege.

    I entered the military under the delayed enlistment program — meaning I signed up in March and reported to basic training in September. During that time, you would not believe the stuff some of my peers warned me about the military — all of it second hand, of course, and all of it wrong.

    My recruiter, Staff Sergeant Randy Quinn, was black, street savvy like me, and honest. I was ready to walk away at the first sign of any BS, but there never was any. To this day I am grateful to him for leading this skeptic through the entire process, clearing away all of the Hollywood and popular culture stereotypes, and opening a door to a world I never imagined existed.

    By the way… if I had stayed at my order-filler job at Charles Levy Circulating Company, I’d be eligible to retire in 2019. One of the reasons I made my decision to join the Air Force is because I watched my friend’s mom retire from CLCC. It went somethiong like this: The line supervisor stopped the “returns” conveyor belt she was working at, gathered us all around for a few words, gave her the proverbial gold watch, and we all went back to work. Total elapsed time: Ten minutes, tops.

    And while there is absolutely nothing wrong with such a job, I knew right then and there I just could not spend 45 years of my life (I started working there in 1974) doing a job that took me a week or so to learn. I needed ever-greater challenges, and I needed to continuously grow mentally.

  11. Mike Gold
    October 11, 2010 - 6:06 am

    I don’t have a problem with military recruiters per se, I have a problem with the concept of on-campus recruiting. A lot of false implications and false promises are made to kids.

    You know, marketing.

    As for providing contact information to the military, why is that a big deal? The government has all that information anyway.

    The fact is, the military is a job choice. Parents who believe there is something wrong with giving their children the choice of joining the armed forces should educate their charges accordingly. Parents who believe the claims and offers made by the military should appreciate the fact that the other recruiters are doing the same thing and should educate their charges accordingly — across the board.

    This is not to say that all recruiters, military and otherwise, act in an unethical way. But their performance is judged by the number of recruits they recruit, and like traffic and parking ticket quotas, that puts pressure on these individuals.

  12. John Tebbel
    October 11, 2010 - 6:55 am

    Only because this is a matter of life and death:

    R. Sez:
    “John: From your rhetoric, it’s pretty obvious you’ve spent way too much time on leftist Web sites.”

    R: It’s pretty obvious from your rhetorical style, depending as it does on first resort to a demeaning attack, that you’ve spent too much time in Junior High School. If you’ve got a prob with my facts or my ideas have at it.

    I’ve got a lot of problems with your assertions–

    Adolescents, are, too, confused, trying to separate the reality of their existence from the lies told them by their parents, teachers, cops, politicians and superior officers. Ask any medical or educational professional or any military person whose line responsibility includes training recruits. If they weren’t confused they’d be idiots. It’s no sin, most of them outgrow it, and it’s certainly no insult, just as it’s no insult that a baby can’t walk.

    And, the all volunteer force it a total bust because we’ve had to commit our reserves and the reserves behind the reserves to fight a needless war that cost a trillion dollars. This all fits into the Cheney/Norquist/Rove plan to get the government small enough to drown in the bathtub, or wastebasket or other soul defeating, insulting, demeaning phrase that tears the heart out of every founding father’s dream, and insults the legacy and service of anyone who’s ever served our country in uniform or out.

    “Potential recruits now are better informed than ever about the pros and cons of military service”

    And how do we know this? I don’t think we do. It might be more possible to get information, but I don’t trust people to be able to educate themselves, necessarily. I don’t believe in “Online Universities” either. I don’t believe Tarzan taught himself to read by finding a box of books in the jungle. When you’re leaning one way or another on any decision, a person, any person, will tend to arrange the world and it’s facts to better fit the pop-up-book of perception. Friend of mine in the neighborhood won’t wear a bike helmet because she remembers newsreels of thousands of Dutchmen riding without helmets. Sure.

    And you don’t need to worry about freelance peaceniks competing against the majesty of our government. I can’t remember the last time I saw an ad for peace when I sat down at a movie theatre but the military’s on before every show. My tax dollars at work. I don’t think the average recruit ever spends any time at the peace card table. I never hear anyone complaining about their efforts.

    “This drives those on the left who have skewed views of the military out of their minds, so they find all kinds of wild excuses why it’s happening — save for the real reason: The leftist stereotypes, as a whole, are just plain wrong.”

    Plain or fancy, your facts are wrong, airman. There aren’t enough recruits for a war. When there are enough recruits they don’t have to send in the reserves. This is an essential bit of military knowledge that Cheney knows the people don’t have, now that military matters are becoming part of a closely held priesthood.

    Your conservative take on leftist stereotype would be funny if there weren’t people dying. You might be interested to know that at one time I thought Black folks had rhythm. Turns out they don’t. I was lied to. People who told me were older and, I thought, wiser, so I swallowed it.

    As a 30-year member of the Air Force Association, I know that they don’t have the personnel and the equipment they need to do the job today and in the future. Lucky for the air service, they can automate a lot of what they do. If we had to fly manned sorties at the rate they can fly Remotely Piloted Vehicles, we’d be out of luck and burying scores of dead air crews.

    The Army isn’t so lucky, so they have to cope with their highest suicide rates.

    And the all-volunteer force is a way to better international relations (peace). When the bosses have a giant standing army at their disposal they can march into Chechnya, or Tibet, or wherever they please. When they don’t they have to risk it all in an insane gamble, like the Cheney plan. Or, alternatively, sell the idea of a war to the whole country. There’s still bilge abroad in the land that the financial hole we’re in has any cause other than “war charged to a credit card.” And people drive drunk, while they’re on the phone, while texting. We’re stupid when we want something.

    In the mind of Cheney the military is an unfeeling, uncaring clone army ready to fight and kill and die on the slightest pretext (ask our national hero and lifelong Republican Colin Powell about this, and how he fell on his sword for the cowards Cheney and Bush to send thousands to kill and die for a lie. That’s “a lie.”).

    And these are problems you don’t get into as a military man until you’re at least a light Colonel. Then, you go to the War College and learn to be a soldier-statesman. Until then, your job doesn’t include “reason why” but mostly “do or die”.

    So the military isn’t all about Army of One and college aid, just like cigarettes aren’t all about smoking pleasure. There’s cruel death involved, unplanned and at the hands of another, just to get gruesome. And you’re against information? Or only if it’s presented by those whose stereotypes you love to hate?

    Your personal history is fine, son. Have a great life. But it’s an anecdote, not a fact that’s useful to this or any other argument. Hollywood and popular culture let you down? Those two institutions are there to make money, not to tell truth to power. Glad you learned that lesson. Sorry it took so long.

    And Levy Circulation is a hell hole. Lots of businesses are, lots of jobs are. Lots of people don’t fit in the military either. Some people get killed as a part of the job, a commander can tell you that many orders involve the certainty of casualty and death, yet must be given.

    And you probably would have been laid off with most of the rest of the company; people aren’t buying print like they used to, and from what I know about Levy they will fight innovation till they’re cold and dead.

    So you’ve had two jobs, total, and like the second one? You’ve won the lottery.

  13. R. Maheras
    October 11, 2010 - 12:02 pm

    John, your whole argument that the military specifically targets “confused adolescents” for nefarious reasons makes no sense. Military recruiters target young people for the exact same reason vocational institutions, educational institutions, businesses, and non-profits target young people – especially recent graduates: Those young people are at a transition point in their lives where they are entering the workplace or looking for a career path.

    In addition, as anyone who has ever tried recruiting in any organization (civilian OR military) will tell you, recruiting gets much more difficult once people are older and have already selected and are established in a career path. As people get older they get married, have kids, buy property and are thus far less likely to be available to be uprooted and sent off to basic training, technical school and then reassigned somewhere across the country or the world.

    And unlike Wal-Mart or some other careers, the Air Force spends tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars training each and every one of its specialists or pilots, which means the return on the taxpayer investment is much better if a person, once trained, opts to stay in the service as long as possible.

    John wrote: “And, the all volunteer force it a total bust because we’ve had to commit our reserves and the reserves behind the reserves to fight a needless war that cost a trillion dollars.”

    The all-volunteer force is a total bust? It was established more than 35 years ago. If it was a “total bust” our services would have run out of people decades ago and the draft would have been reinstated. The reasons the Reserve and the Guard were tapped so heavily in recent years is because we had a massive drawdown of military personnel after the fall of the Berlin Wall (along with a massive closure of bases) to save money, and it eventually came back to bite us in the butt. One cannot suddenly and massively increase the active duty mission at two warfronts without either heavily tasking the Guard and Reserve, implementing a draft, or both. The all-volunteer force was never designed for a wartime surge, which is why the requirement for draft registration never went away. But politically, reinstituting the draft was never a popular option, so Rumsfeld and company opted to make due with existing resources. It put an inordinate amount of strain on the military, and my view is that if the administration was not willing to commit the amount of resources it needed to handle the two wars (which should have included at least a limited call-up of draftees), it shouldn’t have committed itself to the wars in the first place.

    Regarding your Cheney fixation. He’d gone. Out of office. Nowhere to be found. He’s ancient history. Get over him.

    Regarding my work history, I’ve actually had about 10 different jobs, of which CLCC and the USAF were but two. I’ve been a manager and a worker, union and non-union. I’ve been laid off and I’ve quit. I’ve been a blue-collar worker (quite often, actually) and I’ve had white collar jobs. As a civilian, I’ve hired and fired, and I also had to recruit people. So your “lottery” quip was just a bad assumption.

    I’ve been around the block a few times, and I know what I’m talking about.

  14. R. Maheras
    October 11, 2010 - 12:48 pm

    Mike wrote: “This is not to say that all recruiters, military and otherwise, act in an unethical way. But their performance is judged by the number of recruits they recruit, and like traffic and parking ticket quotas, that puts pressure on these individuals.”

    The pressure put on military recruiters can lead to abuses, but I think those abuses are most often personality driven. I’ve worked quite a bit with recruiters over the years (primarily Air Force, but I have worked with the other services as well), and, for the most part, I’ve found them to be a great bunch of folks.

    The fact is, at least as far as the Air Force is concerned, the service sells itself. The problem stems from the fact that USAF is very selective, making the pool of potential applicants that much smaller. As I recall, recruiters have to reject something like 85 percent of the people who walk in the door. Some are disqualified for physical, academic, criminal, drug abuse or mental reasons. Some have credit problems, and some have tatoos in visible locations that exceed the limits allowed by Air Force directives.

    So, yeah, recruiting can be a tough gig.

  15. R. Maheras
    October 11, 2010 - 1:19 pm

    When I wrote the response to Mike above, “USAF” and “selective” for some reason made me remember the blog post I wrote last year about George Carlin’s turbulent stint in the Air Force during the 1950s.

    If you are interested, here’s the post: http://open.salon.com/blog/r_maheras/2009/08/05/george_carlins_us_air_force_years

Comments are closed.